georgeshelou wrote:
I mentioned that the outpost has to have none of your squads moving to it this is true but don't get confused, you were unable to force relocate the colony to your outpost because perhaps your outpost had a squad sitting on it or moving from it. As I have also said there is a difference between the two terms "moving to" and moving from"
George
to break down your reply
1)georgeshelou wrote:
I mentioned that the outpost has to have none of your squads moving to it this is true "
Ive re read what you said and you did not say this George. In fact you said the the oposite of this
georgeshelou wrote:
These are my answers to your questions:
1) If I have my own squads moving to my own op then I CANT force relocate a conquered col to it.
This is false, if you have your own squads moving to your outpost then you are always able to force relocate a conquered colony to it.
P.S: Remember that there is a difference between the two terms "moving to" and "moving from". You will understand me better if you read carefully the second answer to the second question.
.
2) georgeshelou wrote:
but don't get confused, you were unable to force relocate the colony to your outpost because perhaps your outpost had a squad sitting on it or moving from it."
This line from you is really frustrating George. Your telling me not to get confused and yet your commenting as if you haven't even bothered reading the start of the thread
to quote from the start of the thread -
Get1 wrote:
I don't have any spies or agents on the colony or on the op I'm trying to force relocate the colony to.
I have no units on the op I'm trying to force relocate the colony to.
Korupt then asked me - "Do you have units moving from it?"
I replied "NO
his col is being attacked by another player to take a crystal
the op I'm trying to relocate the col to to has my units moving to it but neither has units moving from it"
3)georgeshelou wrote:
As I have also said there is a difference between the two terms "moving to" and moving from"
I don't understand why you feel the need to keep pointing out that there is a difference between the two terms "moving to" and "moving from"
Nothing in these posts has suggested there is any confusion between the two.
In fact I'm pretty sure any child above the age of 5 will know the difference between the two as they know the difference between "moving up" and "moving down" and "getting bigger" and "getting smaller"
Seriously George
all I've been looking for is clarity and all you've done here, Im afraid, is muddy the waters