Author |
Message |
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:17 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm Posts: 1183
|
sparta23 wrote: E1 is defiantly a fun era that's for sure. I see james is becoming quite the forum gentleman
_________________ BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
Top |
|
sparta23
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:22 am |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:28 pm Posts: 94
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:21 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
Slinkybd wrote: sparta23 wrote: E1 is defiantly a fun era that's for sure. I see james is becoming quite the forum gentleman Thank you Slinky for falling down to the level of the newb you seem to be..spam bombing us while being conquered by another alliance..and having really no weight in this era.
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:35 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm Posts: 1183
|
gaurav1 wrote: Slinkybd wrote: sparta23 wrote: E1 is defiantly a fun era that's for sure. I see james is becoming quite the forum gentleman Thank you Slinky for falling down to the level of the newb you seem to be..spam bombing us while being conquered by another alliance..and having really no weight in this era. My choice alone. I just don't like Captain too much. Not like its against the rules or anything and also not my fault you dont have units allocated to protect yourselves at all times. If your willing to judge the skill level of players based on your own inabilities and "morals" just to make yourself seem more adequate, that would make me laugh. Ultimately the game is about stats. I spammed you b/c you guys killed me early on and force relocated me. Though I was never prepared for the round. Getting attacked....well its natural instinct to retaliate. Losing 17 outposts in less than 8 ticks to this "level of newb" makes you guys look rather bad though if we are going to judge by your standards.
_________________ BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:22 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
Slinkybd wrote: gaurav1 wrote: Slinkybd wrote: I see james is becoming quite the forum gentleman Thank you Slinky for falling down to the level of the newb you seem to be..spam bombing us while being conquered by another alliance..and having really no weight in this era. My choice alone. I just don't like Captain too much. Not like its against the rules or anything and also not my fault you dont have units allocated to protect yourselves at all times. If your willing to judge the skill level of players based on your own inabilities and "morals" just to make yourself seem more adequate, that would make me laugh. Ultimately the game is about stats. I spammed you b/c you guys killed me early on and force relocated me. Though I was never prepared for the round. Getting attacked....well its natural instinct to retaliate. Losing 17 outposts in less than 8 ticks to this "level of newb" makes you guys look rather bad though if we are going to judge by your standards. We do not prepare for a tank squad spambomb with all gates jammed and rejammed in a secondary continent on the other hand of the warfare. We will however retake every single one of them. But all is forgiven, as everyone who plays this game at a serious level knows you're nothing but a bad joke who couldn't get into a good alliance if he'd bribe the leader. Taking that into account it makes perfect sense for you to have nothing better to do then join eras and spend your time trying to slow down better players. Great job on the forum activity though! Cheers!
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 1:10 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm Posts: 1183
|
Alexanderkitty wrote: Slinkybd wrote: gaurav1 wrote: Thank you Slinky for falling down to the level of the newb you seem to be..spam bombing us while being conquered by another alliance..and having really no weight in this era. My choice alone. I just don't like Captain too much. Not like its against the rules or anything and also not my fault you dont have units allocated to protect yourselves at all times. If your willing to judge the skill level of players based on your own inabilities and "morals" just to make yourself seem more adequate, that would make me laugh. Ultimately the game is about stats. I spammed you b/c you guys killed me early on and force relocated me. Though I was never prepared for the round. Getting attacked....well its natural instinct to retaliate. Losing 17 outposts in less than 8 ticks to this "level of newb" makes you guys look rather bad though if we are going to judge by your standards. We do not prepare for a tank squad spambomb with all gates jammed and rejammed in a secondary continent on the other hand of the warfare. We will however retake every single one of them. But all is forgiven, as everyone who plays this game at a serious level knows you're nothing but a bad joke who couldn't get into a good alliance if he'd bribe the leader. Taking that into account it makes perfect sense for you to have nothing better to do then join eras and spend your time trying to slow down better players. Great job on the forum activity though! Cheers! I was playing E4 when the era started, I'm not one to play multiple worlds at once. But thanks for the forgiveness. Though this Alexanderkitty wrote: as everyone who plays this game at a serious level knows you're nothing but a bad joke who couldn't get into a good alliance if he'd bribe the leader. is kind of funny seeing as most of the time, I'm your Aister sort of player.
_________________ BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
Top |
|
kentmorgan
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 1:53 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:32 am Posts: 105 Location: Uk Gender: male
|
Hows E1 going ? Seem its getting interesting...
|
|
Top |
|
RupertAngier
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:11 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:27 pm Posts: 1287
|
|
Top |
|
CptAmerica
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:20 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:08 am Posts: 288
|
slow and steady wins the race
and slinky, I don't like you either...so feelings mutual.
|
|
Top |
|
indala
|
Post subject: Re: WaC vs DEF Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:52 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:54 am Posts: 182 Location: Argentina/Buenos Aires Gender: female
|
A question Captain: What was the meaning of the tour for Southamerica?
_________________ Celene Cruella Devil Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND)
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|