Forum rules
1.) No trolling. If you cant have fun without being a jerk to others, find some other forum to QQ
2.) No inappropriate/vulgar/sexually explicit posting. Staff reserves the right to deem anything they see fit as inappropriate.
3.) Have fun and don't post anything not geared at having fun!
4.) Please respect staff members and their decisions at all times. If you cannot accept a staff or moderator decision, please appeal to admin Seth.
| Author |
Message |
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Reality vs BattleDawn  Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm
Posts: 1326
Gender: male
|
There hasn't been an off topic thread in a while and i miss it. And just now i was reading something about nukes and this idea came to mind. So the idea here is you compare an aspect of battle dawn to real life, it could be describing a similarity or a difference. If this has been done before then come up with more stuff, make that mind of yours work for once  I will go first: ~In reality Infantry don't have necessarily have an advantage over vehicles and vehicles don't necessarily have an advantage over tanks. ~Soldiers do gain experience in real life and get better, w/o all the little details as in BD.
_________________
{ power < everything else;
and network = everything else;
thus conquer > network}
return Infallible Logic;
LLm(#3),WC(#1),BoB(?)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Tenkai
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:09 pm |
|
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 2:20 pm
Posts: 2122
Location: invading your world
Gender: female
|
|
~in reality infantry would technically be weak to everything.
~in reality nukes would destroy a colony completely.
off topic is deader than spam ever was
_________________
don't cry for me when i'm gone, just send me a friend request idiot: PSN TenkaiNankobu
|
|
| Top |
|
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:15 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm
Posts: 1326
Gender: male
|
Tenkai wrote: ~in reality infantry would technically be weak to everything.
~in reality nukes would destroy a colony completely.
off topic is deader than spam ever was which is not really a bad thing, i see many many other threads being made.
_________________
{ power < everything else;
and network = everything else;
thus conquer > network}
return Infallible Logic;
LLm(#3),WC(#1),BoB(?)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ghossfeld88
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:50 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 6:42 pm
Posts: 522
Location: N/A
Gender: male
|
|
Nukes in real Life destroy everything in its path
Nukes in BD destroy some units on an outpost
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
FTSAgent107
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:00 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 49
|
Tenkai wrote: ~in reality infantry would technically be weak to everything Incorrect. An infantry member specialized in handling tanks and vehicles would destroy. Yea they have those in real life  You cant boost reds and get an overly powerful military in real life ;D There isn't war all around us. A countries power in real life is not based off of how many they have killed. In real life, workers die everyday. In real life, there is the UN that tries to keep the world in order.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:08 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am
Posts: 7353
Location: Fuyuki City
Gender: male
|
Tenkai wrote: ~in reality infantry would technically be weak to everything not really, idk about beam, but explosive won't work much on inf...
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm
Posts: 1326
Gender: male
|
|
umm if explosives can kill tanks they can kill infs.
_________________
{ power < everything else;
and network = everything else;
thus conquer > network}
return Infallible Logic;
LLm(#3),WC(#1),BoB(?)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:46 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am
Posts: 7353
Location: Fuyuki City
Gender: male
|
|
not really, explosive rounds can only be used as a suppression tactics, it's expensive, low rate of fire and can't be used in closed space and close range make them an unfavored weapons against inf... they only kill lots of inf when the inf are standing together, which is not in the case of a battlefield...
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Tenkai
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:35 am |
|
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 2:20 pm
Posts: 2122
Location: invading your world
Gender: female
|
aister wrote: Tenkai wrote: ~in reality infantry would technically be weak to everything not really, idk about beam, but explosive won't work much on inf... what are grenades what are claymores what are mines what are homemade bombs
_________________
don't cry for me when i'm gone, just send me a friend request idiot: PSN TenkaiNankobu
|
|
| Top |
|
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: Reality vs BattleDawn Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:42 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am
Posts: 7353
Location: Fuyuki City
Gender: male
|
|
grenades, homemade bombs are used as suppressing methods... while the rest are used as traps...
the only way that grenades are used good is against bunkers
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
