It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 3:06 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:44 am 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 8:48 pm
Posts: 4754
Location: Chicago, IL, USA.
Gender: male
I'm sitting around watching, and I'm not sure what SA is doing in all of this, but watch them. Because I know their players, and they are the best players I've ever played with/against.

_________________
Image
KM-AI-TwF-ARM-ALLY-HORD-CME-ToW-CP-HINI-ISKC-COPS-DRAW-ROTR
Quote:
Matt Wyman/Apollo wrote: if I've learned one thing this era, it's that theres nothing scarier than a tired juno


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:28 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm
Posts: 61
apollo wrote:
I'm sitting around watching, and I'm not sure what SA is doing in all of this, but watch them. Because I know their players, and they are the best players I've ever played with/against.


Touche, i also, know a few and know their intentions, power and potential to win. Which is why id rather face them united with the other top alliance while some are still alive, then in post-war slaughter

_________________
- SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister
Retired member of AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD
TLA, DETA current member

SiN Family Forever


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:24 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:46 am
Posts: 67
Well attacking an alliance you hold a NAP with till 1700 agreed in the first 500 ticks of the round will not be easy.

I understood that SA can not go to aus and BL and AcO can not be in AA. So if these agreements are kept how could we attack SA? surly they are immune untill the nap is up or unless they break it.?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:02 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:36 am
Posts: 115
Gender: male
I find it amusing that people talk about attacking allies, or those they have a NAP with etc, on an open forum. Way to keep the cards close to your chest :roll:

About as smart as half the Broadcasts you read

_________________
-Alliances-
OC: NOM, XXX, NACO, BYZ, nWo, aRaB
NC: AcO, DC, WHO, CBoP, BYZ


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:08 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Gender: male
Typical Kaiser, isn't it??

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:17 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm
Posts: 61
lol is Hypolaw PSiT?

_________________
- SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister
Retired member of AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD
TLA, DETA current member

SiN Family Forever


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:07 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm
Posts: 61
Orestis, as i recall, your alliance (PSiT) backstabbed us. We had a NAP and when my alliance (AcO) was making gates and radars and ops in NA you decided to do a clearly planned and organized attack. NA was 39th's homeland, not yours. And either way, you must have planeed before that , because you had your armies and spams perfectly postioned from California, all the way to Brazil for war. Our ops barley even had 30 contorl ticks and then out of no where you attack us.

We merely defended, so who is the backstabbed? and as i recall , GML is notorious for backstabing

_________________
- SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister
Retired member of AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD
TLA, DETA current member

SiN Family Forever


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:24 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:46 am
Posts: 67
I heard BL are going to help SA take down AcO for second place.... eh but whwat do i know... im just a sub


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:20 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 356
Gender: male
Supz108x wrote:
I heard BL are going to help SA take down AcO for second place.... eh but whwat do i know... im just a sub


BL....is going to help SA(who is attacking us) take down AcO(who is our closest and most trusted ally) so we can take 2nd place, witch we are going to get with AcO...What part of that made sense? Not trying to bash you, but the logic that is lacking from this has me boggled.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard

Current alliances-None
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:34 pm 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 8:48 pm
Posts: 4754
Location: Chicago, IL, USA.
Gender: male
GML was never a backstabbing alliance. Where have you heard such?
316434 wrote:
and as i recall , GML is notorious for backstabing

_________________
Image
KM-AI-TwF-ARM-ALLY-HORD-CME-ToW-CP-HINI-ISKC-COPS-DRAW-ROTR
Quote:
Matt Wyman/Apollo wrote: if I've learned one thing this era, it's that theres nothing scarier than a tired juno


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
WarLingo Android Mobile Game

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl