It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:03 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:13 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:12 am
Posts: 194
Gender: male
XtremeRageX wrote:
AwesomeOne wrote:
Being honest here I only read the "who wants cookies and milk part" and hmmm I do not wish to have any of your cookies or milk what do you take me for. OH but if you are offering out pineapples then well that is an entirely different scenario. *Hint* GIMME a pineapple PLEASE...


I hardly see how this has anything to do with the war.


Why it thas everything and nothing to do with it, the pineapple is the key to victory you see.

_________________
Image

All war is deception,
We the few, defend the many
The Myth The L3G3ND
BoneCRusher, TE The Elite


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:37 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 356
Gender: male
TheReturnOfTheDead wrote:
Battledawn,
I am here to talk about a few things.

1) WAN war.
We purposly ran 4 of our armies into WAN's army. We knew we were going to lose. It was questioned by many, but my method worked. We were going up against a ton of alliances. We weren't having much team cooperation and I knew I couldn't let WAN stay close to our hive with that much and MAD apporaching. It knocked WAN out of the top allinaces down to 9th, they are up to 8th I think.

2) MAD war.
MAD had all the time in the world to attack us. We were having team operation issues. I have got my team to pull together as one and we are pushing MAD (Who had a ton of ops just north of our colony) all the way back to XY's colony. They have showed no resistance.

3) Seth "Not Leading" anymore.
Everybody talks, Everybody listens, and somehow.. the truth.. always comes up missing. Anyway, I recieved a message from a player on MAD at tick 211 stating this.
"This war will change very soon.

Your plan to kick us out of the EAst side of map worked. We also got our butt kicked my spam, some of us even got conqured by spam.

Yesterday was a horible day.

This will be different now.

Instead of Seth making all the choices/ relationships, its my turn. Unlike him, I am good at leading, he is good at making relationships."

I understand that you know, someone could be streching the truth and I am not 100% believing the person. But I think it is funny in general :)

4) A quick catch-up
As you might have noticed about 35 ticks ago we were down in power by about 135ish. We closed that gap down to 70. We are moving and picking up outposts. XY doesn't have a lot to do. He must relcoate or lose his bad build army in general. Once he relcoates all of his resc. ops will be ours. So bye bye either way XY.

5) NLR vs G.
These two teams, G is M ally and NLR is MAD ally, aren't taking part in the M vs. WAN/MAD war. I have not seen a single attack by NLR, so I don't include him in the big war. Please note that these two allinaces are in a good battle and from what I seen... NLR dropped some power and G has only gained.

Anyway... I have some cookies in milk. Who wants some?


LOL, i dont know what you are on about but i am still leading MAD. I many not be over seeing the military operations anymore but i am still MADs leader. As for XYs bad army build when he joined WILD he was building inf but WILD was cav so he started to build cav. However WILD fell apart due to my way with words and he joined us. Thus having to chance builds once again.

The G vs NLR was has been cute to watch. NLR made the mistake of going to bed and got nuked for it :(

The power gains by M have been quite extreme. It seems like M has a few more reds than MAD. This era is long from over and i have a feeling we are going to see some changes here soon.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard

Current alliances-None
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:30 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 67
Gaining power isn't solely based on reds or tokens in general... yes some people have boosted to rebuild armies but resource ops, conquers, crystals etc.. have all played a KEY part in our power gaining..

do not assme that we are boosters.. merely 2 players are still boosting reds.. infact i don't think any are :)



Just Saying.

_________________
IGN : Baby bear, OwNaGe
Best alliance rank : 1
Best finished rank : 4 (m1)

Current Era: m1
Rank: 5
Alliance: HaHa
Alliance rank: 1

p.s I like oranges


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:24 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 356
Gender: male
badboii wrote:
Gaining power isn't solely based on reds or tokens in general... yes some people have boosted to rebuild armies but resource ops, conquers, crystals etc.. have all played a KEY part in our power gaining..

do not assme that we are boosters.. merely 2 players are still boosting reds.. infact i don't think any are :)



Just Saying.


There is no problem with boosters. I was just pointing out something obvious. I know MAD has had an economic advantage over everyone because of the number of res ops we control. While we did lose a small number when XY relocated, we still control about 1/4 of all res ops on the world.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard

Current alliances-None
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:10 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 327
Location: Remsen, Iowa
Gender: male
felgrand08 wrote:
badboii wrote:
Gaining power isn't solely based on reds or tokens in general... yes some people have boosted to rebuild armies but resource ops, conquers, crystals etc.. have all played a KEY part in our power gaining..

do not assme that we are boosters.. merely 2 players are still boosting reds.. infact i don't think any are :)



Just Saying.


There is no problem with boosters. I was just pointing out something obvious. I know MAD has had an economic advantage over everyone because of the number of res ops we control. While we did lose a small number when XY relocated, we still control about 1/4 of all res ops on the world.


How is that obvious? You guys have 3 of the top 5 players. We have 1. If you can't your sub.. and I wouldn't.. you would have 4 of the top 5 players. Yet you are saying it is obvious we are the big boosters? I have no problem in anyone saying my team boosted, yes we did. Is the reason why we are gaining you in power simply from boosting? Of course not. It isn't close. It is because my players are determined. They are ready for battle and are taking over a lot of ground. Yes you guys own a ton of res. outpots. But look is near you guys... NO ONE. We shared/share land with NLR, TWL, WAN, and subs. While you guys are free to a bunch of area. Also XY losing a few squauds here and there doesn't help..

Update on war:
We have pushed XY out of the north completely. XY and another member targetted me and Gomer's 18 ships with 27 of theirs. We didn't back down, yet they still turned back to XY's colony. So us, holding the tempo, attacked XY's colony. Of course we were bluffing, we were trying to get XY out of the area so we can focus as a team on moving west. Which XY did relocate a few ticks later after we returned.

Fat Man has taken Amandas spot because Amandas warned me from tick 1 that after tick 200, that they will fall inactive. So, Fat Man stepped up. We are now only 40ish power behind MAD.

And seth... you better be careful on what you wish for. Because if you truly want to see our ships come to your area... you won't have to wait for much longer.

_________________
The Italian Mafia


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:37 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 356
Gender: male
TheReturnOfTheDead wrote:
felgrand08 wrote:
badboii wrote:
Gaining power isn't solely based on reds or tokens in general... yes some people have boosted to rebuild armies but resource ops, conquers, crystals etc.. have all played a KEY part in our power gaining..

do not assme that we are boosters.. merely 2 players are still boosting reds.. infact i don't think any are :)



Just Saying.


There is no problem with boosters. I was just pointing out something obvious. I know MAD has had an economic advantage over everyone because of the number of res ops we control. While we did lose a small number when XY relocated, we still control about 1/4 of all res ops on the world.


How is that obvious? You guys have 3 of the top 5 players. We have 1. If you can't your sub.. and I wouldn't.. you would have 4 of the top 5 players. Yet you are saying it is obvious we are the big boosters? I have no problem in anyone saying my team boosted, yes we did. Is the reason why we are gaining you in power simply from boosting? Of course not. It isn't close. It is because my players are determined. They are ready for battle and are taking over a lot of ground. Yes you guys own a ton of res. outpots. But look is near you guys... NO ONE. We shared/share land with NLR, TWL, WAN, and subs. While you guys are free to a bunch of area. Also XY losing a few squauds here and there doesn't help..

Update on war:
We have pushed XY out of the north completely. XY and another member targetted me and Gomer's 18 ships with 27 of theirs. We didn't back down, yet they still turned back to XY's colony. So us, holding the tempo, attacked XY's colony. Of course we were bluffing, we were trying to get XY out of the area so we can focus as a team on moving west. Which XY did relocate a few ticks later after we returned.

Fat Man has taken Amandas spot because Amandas warned me from tick 1 that after tick 200, that they will fall inactive. So, Fat Man stepped up. We are now only 40ish power behind MAD.

And seth... you better be careful on what you wish for. Because if you truly want to see our ships come to your area... you won't have to wait for much longer.

Woah there. Wasnt hating on teh boosting. I never said we didnt ahve boosters. And we are looking forward to some action.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard

Current alliances-None
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:47 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
 Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 327
Location: Remsen, Iowa
Gender: male
felgrand08 wrote:
Woah there. Wasnt hating on teh boosting. I never said we didnt ahve boosters. And we are looking forward to some action.


I have a question...
Why declare war on us in the first place if you guys were just going to play defense the whole time?


Image

_________________
The Italian Mafia


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:38 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 356
Gender: male
TheReturnOfTheDead wrote:
felgrand08 wrote:
Woah there. Wasnt hating on teh boosting. I never said we didnt ahve boosters. And we are looking forward to some action.


I have a question...
Why declare war on us in the first place if you guys were just going to play defense the whole time?


Image


This wasnt our war. Us declaring war was only to help WAN. The initial plan was a quick attack to draw your army off, but we got caught blind sided by several other alliances that we were forced to deal with.

There was never a large offense planned. In fact i had planned to only take this war as far as getting WAN our of M territory.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard

Current alliances-None
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:07 pm 
BD Maintenance Team
BD Maintenance Team
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:02 pm
Posts: 566
Tsk tsk. My oh my, I'd so wish I didn't miss out on this war... Oh well :cry:

_________________
IGN: Vault Dweller


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: World War I
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:42 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 356
Gender: male
Momentary cease fire as MAD and M leaders talk.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard

Current alliances-None
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS.


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
WarLingo Android Mobile Game

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl