It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:56 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 449
Gender: male
thechessshark13 wrote:
kelulen wrote:
You trap em in a cage and then you drown em a then you feed them to the lions.... :roll:

Nasty tactics.

Hey, I dont backstabb... but anything else is game ;)
And to explain for the last time why BL wasn't backstabbed by BoS, even though I did not pushed the order, is that my members mistook BL for an enemy, as TWL was a 100% enemy, but they were brother alliances, making everything quite more complicated than normal. Plus, when I finally came online, I tried to fix it, but then it was you who said no Raider. I knew that would happen from the start, but this was all a misunderstanding between my team and you, and I was unavailable to fix it at the right time. Don't be calling me names that Im not. Ofc you can still go on saying Im a backstabber and such, but if you dont understand this then you dissapoint me, and I would no longer care of what you say, you'd just be a huge whiner who can't take a logic argument right. I know you're not, so let's stop the kiddy broadcasting: we won with our armies, so no need to fight with our mouths, the real battle's over. Expect us at your hive, I hope there's cake involved ^_^

Boss you dont need to explain yourself to everyone. If they want to think we backstabbed let them. Arguing is jsut going to fuel there fire. Just leave it be, your better than them. No need to argue with them.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD

Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:46 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:46 am
Posts: 3
Jumbalaya wrote:
kelulen wrote:
And where does G fit in all of this?

They are in the backstabbing as well, honestly i have more of a problem with G than anyone else in this war, considering we were allies and they backstabbed, BoS im upset about you guys too, but it was bound to happen and TWL brought it upon, but G was allied with both of us and decides to attack? Whatever I guess, it looks like we're outnumbered more than 2x our power, as for me? I no longer have an army, so now ill just BC at you to keep things fun, GL to all involved.

~Jumbalaya


BL we (G+ROSS) are mostly attacking because they attacked Lia when she joined us. We would have declared a war on BL for that with or without BoS. It was a clear and harsh violation of our NAP. I even mailed Raider about it but got no response.

As for TWL we decided that BoS's claims that TWL are going to back stab them seemed truthful. Therefore we decided to honor our alliance with BoS and join their war.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:50 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 449
Gender: male
Can we cut teh bull here and just say, TWL made a big mistake trying tog et people against BoS and BL made teh mistake of standing by them. Now our loyal allies are following us into battle against our foe.

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD

Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:42 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 5:58 am
Posts: 36
Gender: male
thechessshark13 wrote:
kelulen wrote:
You trap em in a cage and then you drown em a then you feed them to the lions.... :roll:

Nasty tactics.

Hey, I dont backstabb... but anything else is game ;)
And to explain for the last time why BL wasn't backstabbed by BoS, even though I did not pushed the order, is that my members mistook BL for an enemy, as TWL was a 100% enemy, but they were brother alliances, making everything quite more complicated than normal. Plus, when I finally came online, I tried to fix it, but then it was you who said no Raider. I knew that would happen from the start, but this was all a misunderstanding between my team and you, and I was unavailable to fix it at the right time. Don't be calling me names that Im not. Ofc you can still go on saying Im a backstabber and such, but if you dont understand this then you dissapoint me, and I would no longer care of what you say, you'd just be a huge whiner who can't take a logic argument right. I know you're not, so let's stop the kiddy broadcasting: we won with our armies, so no need to fight with our mouths, the real battle's over. Expect us at your hive, I hope there's cake involved ^_^



Well sorry the cake all gone....Raider ate all of em before you guys came along. Maybe you'll get a pizza?

Who called you a back stabber? I did not do such things? beside this is the first time i heard about this?
You say TWL started this whole thing, then one of you guys mistakenly attack us, we retaliate, then you tried to talk to Lotus to have peace but raider say no. And it All went from there.

Now i want to know, Why did TWL did it?What made you to attack them?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:50 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:02 pm
Posts: 595
AParkedCart wrote:
bleh dont know how to make it show the picture but heres a pic of a convo being had with hbe and twl. and the betrayal was beginning over 200 ticks ago

http://gyazo.com/d89a2dbe3985d7987be727303f3083d5

This did. Why? because they wanted to win. They couldn't take us out directly, which was just seen, if us invading their TWL-BL joint hive didn't show it, so they tried the only way they had a try for it: backstabbing. Yet we dont take kindly to backstabbing.

_________________
IGN: Vault Dweller


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:59 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 5:58 am
Posts: 36
Gender: male
" Imagine im doing the SpongeBoob Laugh" KAAAHAHAHAHAH.


So it was all about the relic.

Efrael, If im not mistaken. When Lia join you guys he did BC that he is joining G. Also , Raider also did announce Lia is joining G. Why did Lia join you guys?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:16 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:02 pm
Posts: 595
CrazDiam42 wrote:
Hmm Vault, not at all the way I would describe the situation... (I suppose that's always the case in war, isn't it...) Back stabbing is subjective. If we had had any diplomatic agreements with you guys, I assure you, we would have honored them completely. As it was, we mostly just skirted around each other, avoiding conflict, handling incidents on a case-by-case basis. We all knew that if we were to have any chance of winning, we would have to face you guys at some point. As you guys had a significant advantage over us, we knew that we would need all the help we could get. Part of our planning process involved reaching out to our friends, to see if we could get their support. Our only mistake was putting too much trust in the world. :) (I have always been way too trusting, that is one of the qualities that makes me such a terrible leader...) War will always entail a good deal of behind-the-back conspiring. A war where the attacking party publicly announces their intent to do battle, and gives their enemy plenty of time to prepare, is just not realistic.

I don't begrudge BoS for what they have done. They have used the information HBE gave them to preclude our attack; they have turned an advantage for us into an advantage for them. A sound strategical move. :) What I do kinda resent is them turning the war into a crusade, a moral conquest. We all want to win, can't we just leave it at that?

Good luck to you, better luck to us. :D

With the addition of that we DID have a personal NAP, with BL as the conduit (TWL were BL's brother alliance, so were we), then you see where the backstabb was. That should clear things up for you :)

_________________
IGN: Vault Dweller


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:06 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 5:58 am
Posts: 36
Gender: male
So much info to process.

The best way to deal with it is....to :lol: it of.

Now all the east is in trouble... I think the west has more trusting buddies than in the east.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:07 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am
Posts: 449
Gender: male
Image

_________________
IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD

Current alliances-none
Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BOS vs TWL+BL
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:25 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:02 pm
Posts: 595
And Devil Cat's squads have been obliterated, while a strong 200 squads is still headed towards A Strange Machine's colony. Guess the East is as strong as the North this time :P

_________________
IGN: Vault Dweller


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl