It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:36 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours



Forum rules


Please only post here if you have questions about BattleDawn game play, or if you have information that can help another player asking questions.

Please stay on topic.

No spam.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Multiple Attackers Question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:51 pm 
Private
Private
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:03 pm
Posts: 1
I read online and found out that the attackers of a colony/OP team up to kill the defenders before turning on each other if they aren't from the same alliance. What i want to know is just how much the attackers kill each other. If there are two people teaming up to take someone down, do their armies fight to the death after it? And if there are three or more do all three of them go at it to a fight to the death, or do the armies pull back somehow?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Multiple Attackers Question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 10:09 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:04 pm
Posts: 271
Location: Behind you!
ALl of those questions are yes. They fight it out to the very end. Now I dont know if it is more than 2 people that launch at the same tick, but I believe they would take turns teaming up or going solo against the other armies. Only one army exists the battle alive, unless it's multiple armies from a single alliance, in which case, they will always ally against the enemies, and therefore all the remaining allied forces will return safely once every other unit is dead.

_________________
Image
Special thanks to Aister for the siggy!!!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Multiple Attackers Question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:47 am 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
 WWW  YIM  Profile

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am
Posts: 8023
Location: Fuyuki City
Gender: male
if there are 2 attackers (provide these guys are all in different alliances), the 2 attackers will join forces to kill the defenders, then will fight against each other, winner will take the spoil (control of the OP, relics, crystals, conquer, wreckage,...)

if there are more than 2 attackers, all those attackers will join forces to attack the defenders. Then the weaker ones will automatically turn away from the OP, leaving the 2 most powerful forces behind. Then those 2 will attack each other.

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Multiple Attackers Question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:47 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:09 pm
Posts: 130
Location: New York
Gender: male
Why does it do that? Wouldn't it make sense for all the units to attack each other at the same time? (This isn't regarding the round order for Range, Armor, etc btw)

I mean, I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense for outside forces to just team up on the defender even if they do end up turning on the other at the end.

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Multiple Attackers Question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:13 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:04 pm
Posts: 264
Gender: male
That would be a nice suggestion to add. ALOT of ppl will probably be against it as it would change the game and how ppl gang up on one another. But it would make more sense if you as a player could "tell" your army which army(s) should be attacked in what order. So if you'd rather team up with the defenders to take out the other attackers THEN turn on the defenders you could. BUT this would then invent a WHOLE new kind of backstab.

" A & B agree to both attack C at tick 180"
*Attack launched*
*Attacker A changes their "primary target" or "order of targets" to attack B first instead of the defenders C*
*B's army is destroyed, and A then a steamrolls C's defenders.*
"I thought we had a deal says B! BACKSTABBER." lol

But it would add a lot more depth to the game, however it would also empower subs and mulits to a huge extent since they could be used to help initial defense of a location (before dying themselves).
But it could make it more of a "Team" game since a whole alliance could effectively decide to gang up on 1 army even if there's multiple allys. If everyone set their army to attack one person, they could focus on that army. Meaning a whole alliance hiding behind one or two powerhouses wouldn't be as successful.

It's far from perfect... But I think it's definitely an idea worth kicking around.

_________________
Image
HcL, iS, WFA
Personal Rank: 1st__Fantasy 4
Alliance Rank: 1st (iS)__Fantasy 4


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
WarLingo Android Mobile Game

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl