Sorry but Hitler in no way is equal to TLG or even this game. So this whole post was kind of pointless. I also wish I understood. Obviously someone had the idea to attack us and obviously someone ok'd it. If it is not the leader ok-ing things, then the alliances is not run properly. (Not saying this is the case with Karl, but just making my point)

So you put up a good fight, but this in no way is valid on this game.

Finally the correct way to say this situation. *Applauds* I don't mean to come at you like I'm attacking you cause I don't mean for you to take it that way. Also I don't know what is going on so therefore I'm not speaking for any alliance. I'm just speaking on the truths of Backstabbing.

your saying the leader does as hewants maybe in F but in TLG we all agree on things here we dont jump into things at let one rule yes Karl is the leader and one of the best leaders i played under since the old client

as i said good fight it was not backstab what was done was done fair and your leader knows the truth but if you all listen to him well we know who the boss is there

F deserve to die...go TLG!!!

i agree with Random, why it's called a strategy game if you can't be smart? It's an internet game, i can just make a new colony name next era and have the thing called "honor" again

You will never win an era.




Because everyone invests time and money in game - you grow bonds and make promises. Your reputation is all you keep, at the end of the era the crystals, power, all goes to dust. The reputation you hold - the way people remember you - lasts and can aid or harm you other era's.


Random, random, random. I used to have so much respect for you, you were nice and loyal. What happened to you? Power got to your head bro?

Less of a NAP and more of an MDP, we actually held 2 pacts.

1 pact was a MDP against L. If one alliance moved against L, the other was also at war against L, and if L declared on one, the other had to declare on L.

The 2nd pact was as such, whether you call it a NAP or MDP, or alliance, idk.

The terms were:

1. This pact will end whenever all 10 relics are in possession of both parties.

2. This pact by no means explains what happens after 10 relics are in possession, that is to be discussed later

3. Both alliance may not attack each other during this pact.

4. Both alliances are not bound to protection but encouraged to do so

5. Both alliances will set their own boundaries of their territory as the game develops and as deemed fair by both leaders.



Yes, it's a backstab.

Yes, it happens in BD

Yes, I reserve the right to be a little ticked off by the matter, but in the end it is a game and I hold no grudge besides the fact that I will be least likely to trust the players in TLG, and least likely to play with any of them.

Random, you don't play this era seriously and yet you talk seriously about it. Go do something more productive with your hands and mouth and give some girl much needed loving.

Tier, I make my comments to Karl directly because he is responsible for what the alliance does...no matter what. That falls straight on the leader's shoulders and no one elses. That orange flag signifies the entire responsibility of the alliance, and the head of that alliance.

Therefore, if you have a leader you do not wish to follow orders from, you will tarnish his reputation. If a leader makes an order that you're against, but go with it anyways, you will tarnish your own reputation as well as him tarnishing his own.

I will go sleep now.

he got you good Proffesor F:P go on admit it! they probibly were tricking you with the NAP

PPC are the greatest aliance in e3 only ones to have ended on the top 3 every era since creation go PPC die F

I could get Rank 3 as an alliance by recruiting a bunch of newbs from the server and not donating, but last time I did that I got rank 1 as an alliance..