Author |
Message |
ThyLastPenguin
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:32 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:06 pm Posts: 39
|
L33t wrote: ThyLastPenguin wrote: L33t wrote: I didn't want a sub in the first place :/ but since a bunch of top alliances are using "brother alliances" (subs), we figured that we would need one.
If your implying Gold/Red are Blue subs or we're subs of Gold/Red or whatever then your mistaken. There's a huge difference between the 2... Tell me this huge difference then? Subs are there to make sure 1 alliance gets the top spot. They will give away relics, and I have seen some subs let themselves be conquered in order for the main to win. Brother alliances are there to assist each other. They will do what they can to help each other out if needed, but if this assistance will have a negative impact on the alliance itself then they are free to say "Sorry, no can do". If Sick win the round then it'll be a victory for their subs too, yet if Gold win the round then we haven't won, we personally came w/e place the scoreboard gives us.
_________________ ~Dan's Un-Official B*tch~
*Yao ming*
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:33 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
L33t wrote: ThyLastPenguin wrote: L33t wrote: I didn't want a sub in the first place :/ but since a bunch of top alliances are using "brother alliances" (subs), we figured that we would need one.
If your implying Gold/Red are Blue subs or we're subs of Gold/Red or whatever then your mistaken. There's a huge difference between the 2... Tell me this huge difference then? There's no single leader. If I tell the leader of Gold to do something, 50/50% chance they tell me to go to hell.
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
malekk
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:29 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:10 am Posts: 364 Location: IN YOUR HOUSE :O Gender: male
|
L33t wrote: As i said before, Gold had managed to take out middle island in a matter of hours, when we were all asleep. By the time we had waken up, Gold was 3-5 ticks from our hive as well as ECO AND Blue at our sides, we had no choice but to surrender to live and fight another day. I didn't want a sub in the first place :/ but since a bunch of top alliances are using "brother alliances" (subs), we figured that we would need one. I knew Kerss would do this though, never was faithful. Langy wrote: NAP was. Middle island a neutral Zone and radar's only which you broke by attacking our ops when placed. also no gates razed and then CMS tweaking agreement to basically put us into a corner with no gain from any NAP with you, after 3 days of watching our ops attacked by you we had enough and fixed the problem very quick. You sure that neutral zone was even agreed upon? Even if it were, we had full control of the island during NAP talk. And more like 3 days of planning to attack us. We attacked 2 of your ops....1 a gate(which violated your neutral zone) and 1 a radar, far beyond the NAP line. Plus one of the Gold members went crazy and started to attack multiple SiCk ops, more than we ever attacked yours. Difference betwee Blue/Gold brotherhood and subs is that after we're done with relics and such we will fight, not with armies but with score.
_________________
Can't Stop Me!
|
|
Top |
|
Kerss
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:40 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:34 pm Posts: 159
|
forgot i made this topic xD
honestly l33t i told ya i wouldnt be active and thats why i didnt join the main alliance before the round.. ya guys got attacked on a weekend that i wouldnt be home unfortunately, wouldnt have done any good to get conquered with u.. lol my team wasnt that active to survive without me present..
i asked my team and they all decided that this was best so it wasnt just my decision.. sorry it ended up the way it did tho..
_________________
names: Ma Chao Kerss Lu Bu No One Leaves Alive alliances: Mars~ICE,SNOW,SoaP E3~DGB,KnaW,Nam F4~VVV,UgTB,BEAR F6~SAGA,GanG,GOO
|
|
Top |
|
L33t
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:17 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 269 Location: CaLi Gender: male
|
Kerss wrote: forgot i made this topic xD
honestly l33t i told ya i wouldnt be active and thats why i didnt join the main alliance before the round.. ya guys got attacked on a weekend that i wouldnt be home unfortunately, wouldnt have done any good to get conquered with u.. lol my team wasnt that active to survive without me present..
i asked my team and they all decided that this was best so it wasnt just my decision.. sorry it ended up the way it did tho.. Dont worry bout it playa, it hasn't ended yet malekk wrote: Difference betwee Blue/Gold brotherhood and subs is that after we're done with relics and such we will fight, not with armies but with score. Fighting with score makes no sense.
_________________ Wins: NWL, G1 e1 SoTF, E2 e7 SiCk!
|
|
Top |
|
Langy
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:19 am |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:02 am Posts: 536 Gender: male
|
L33t wrote: Kerss wrote: forgot i made this topic xD
honestly l33t i told ya i wouldnt be active and thats why i didnt join the main alliance before the round.. ya guys got attacked on a weekend that i wouldnt be home unfortunately, wouldnt have done any good to get conquered with u.. lol my team wasnt that active to survive without me present..
i asked my team and they all decided that this was best so it wasnt just my decision.. sorry it ended up the way it did tho.. Dont worry bout it playa, it hasn't ended yet malekk wrote: Difference betwee Blue/Gold brotherhood and subs is that after we're done with relics and such we will fight, not with armies but with score. Fighting with score makes no sense. lol Leet. u talk tough now when we leave you be
_________________ (ROTF) (DETH) (MES) (AUA) (TLA) (NO) (REN) (CoV)
PROUD DETH/TLA MEMBER
|
|
Top |
|
clownking
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:28 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:37 pm Posts: 150
|
There's no single leader. If I tell the leader of Gold to do something, 50/50% chance they tell me to go to hell.[/quote] depends Alex you keep telling me to touch you, No I will not touch you!!!! you are not the boss of me!. l33t go ask CMS if gates where allowed on the center island as per agreement my predecessor made. CMS was then advised the NAP was terminated. it was 24 ticks after that we made a move. more then enough time for you guys to get your ducks in a line.
_________________ Founder of TLA
TLA-NO-HOT-MUFF-DeTH-HIGH-KoH-hInI-LOVE
|
|
Top |
|
L33t
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:50 am |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 269 Location: CaLi Gender: male
|
Langy wrote: lol Leet. u talk tough now when we leave you be How am i talking tough?
_________________ Wins: NWL, G1 e1 SoTF, E2 e7 SiCk!
|
|
Top |
|
cms123
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:06 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:17 pm Posts: 4 Gender: male
|
I find it funny that Gold members try to base our NAP on what we had written on the group chat. Me and excitable lettuce (leader at the time) had to talk in private chat because no one would let us talk. finally we had an agreement, which was N:7500 and i have proof of that. I guess the leader didn't let you guys know. oh and we had a day to raze gates, which you guys didn't give us. and i was never got a message saying the NAP was cancelled...
but no point in arguing, Good luck everyone!
- CMS of Plazka
|
|
Top |
|
clownking
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:30 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:37 pm Posts: 150
|
cms123 wrote: I find it funny that Gold members try to base our NAP on what we had written on the group chat. Me and excitable lettuce (leader at the time) had to talk in private chat because no one would let us talk. finally we had an agreement, which was N:7500 and i have proof of that. I guess the leader didn't let you guys know. oh and we had a day to raze gates, which you guys didn't give us. and i was never got a message saying the NAP was cancelled...
but no point in arguing, Good luck everyone!
- CMS of Plazka Not only are you a coward CMS but also a lyer. 4 days your gates stayed on the island. you even had the gall to msg me to raze mine. I replied that I would when you did. you then ignored me. I advised you in msg that nap was then cancelled because you had not stuck to agreement. What do you achieve by lying mate? I have never argued I told you how it was and you choose to ignore my warnings. I know what the original deal even though you made it with lettuce I have always been true leader of gold and nothing ever agreed on without my say so. you where to have no gates on the centre island don't cry because you where incapable of sticking to nap. btw looking forward to watching you run and leave your team to die some more
_________________ Founder of TLA
TLA-NO-HOT-MUFF-DeTH-HIGH-KoH-hInI-LOVE
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|