Author |
Message |
L33t
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:59 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 269 Location: CaLi Gender: male
|
I would assume that Blue and Gold are not going to fight this round?
_________________ Wins: NWL, G1 e1 SoTF, E2 e7 SiCk!
|
|
Top |
|
ThyLastPenguin
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:45 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:06 pm Posts: 39
|
Course not. If we fight gold we'll insta lose. Electric>Water fosho.
_________________ ~Dan's Un-Official B*tch~
*Yao ming*
|
|
Top |
|
Langy
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:11 pm |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:02 am Posts: 536 Gender: male
|
L33t wrote: I would assume that Blue and Gold are not going to fight this round? There is too much love between us all
_________________ (ROTF) (DETH) (MES) (AUA) (TLA) (NO) (REN) (CoV)
PROUD DETH/TLA MEMBER
|
|
Top |
|
L33t
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:06 am |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 269 Location: CaLi Gender: male
|
ThyLastPenguin wrote: Course not. If we fight gold we'll insta lose. Electric>Water fosho. Don't think that's the real reason . Gold did all the dirty work, Blue gets rank 1 alliance from boosting, upsets me a little bit. Langy wrote: L33t wrote: I would assume that Blue and Gold are not going to fight this round? There is too much love between us all That's major loving if you'd ask me
_________________ Wins: NWL, G1 e1 SoTF, E2 e7 SiCk!
|
|
Top |
|
ThyLastPenguin
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:32 am |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:06 pm Posts: 39
|
L33t wrote: ThyLastPenguin wrote: Course not. If we fight gold we'll insta lose. Electric>Water fosho. Don't think that's the real reason . Gold did all the dirty work, Blue gets rank 1 alliance from boosting, upsets me a little bit. Langy wrote: L33t wrote: I would assume that Blue and Gold are not going to fight this round? There is too much love between us all That's major loving if you'd ask me Dirty work? If you mean dirty work as in the Poke vs. Sick "war" the last few ticks then I'm pretty sure ECO just killed a ton of units and sick ran off. Although i'm not 100% sure. I just build stuff, play tetris and wait till another order is given Edit: Herpa derp wasn't playing attention again and only just seen Sick conquered by Gold. Well, not surprising seeing as we had other things to focus on =/
_________________ ~Dan's Un-Official B*tch~
*Yao ming*
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:34 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
L33t wrote: ThyLastPenguin wrote: Course not. If we fight gold we'll insta lose. Electric>Water fosho. Don't think that's the real reason . Gold did all the dirty work, Blue gets rank 1 alliance from boosting, upsets me a little bit. Langy wrote: L33t wrote: I would assume that Blue and Gold are not going to fight this round? There is too much love between us all That's major loving if you'd ask me Lol. I would suggest you refrain from hiding your own alliances failure by trying to shake up other alliances. Blue and Gold work and plan closely together - That SiCK decided not to send a single unit to battle is not our fault. Once we duked out that SiCK was not going to defend, we asked Gold if we could move out which they agreed on. Eco is the only one who killed units IIRC. Furthermore, nice talk about boosters. We have 2 boosters, obviously you have none. I mean, it's not like CMS and Youssif had a higher power rating then actually possible that early... Right? Both, Gold and Blue have attempted to deal with SiCK peacefully. Gold had its NAP agreement broken and Blue had heavy attacks during discussions (which is generally considered rude and immoral). You have nailed your own coffin shut buddy. Don't try to hide that by trying to cause a scene.
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
clownking
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 11:46 am |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:37 pm Posts: 150
|
lol..... dirty work. that would imply that sicks demise was work in anyway. Alex you are right only ECO really killed troops..... Eco are amazing lil chipmunks and deserve respect...... and well SICK.... you guys disappointed!
meowth aka staffy
_________________ Founder of TLA
TLA-NO-HOT-MUFF-DeTH-HIGH-KoH-hInI-LOVE
|
|
Top |
|
L33t
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:21 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 269 Location: CaLi Gender: male
|
Alexanderkitty wrote: Lol. I would suggest you refrain from hiding your own alliances failure by trying to shake up other alliances. Blue and Gold work and plan closely together - That SiCK decided not to send a single unit to battle is not our fault. Once we duked out that SiCK was not going to defend, we asked Gold if we could move out which they agreed on. Eco is the only one who killed units IIRC. Furthermore, nice talk about boosters. We have 2 boosters, obviously you have none. I mean, it's not like CMS and Youssif had a higher power rating then actually possible that early... Right? Both, Gold and Blue have attempted to deal with SiCK peacefully. Gold had its NAP agreement broken and Blue had heavy attacks during discussions (which is generally considered rude and immoral). You have nailed your own coffin shut buddy. Don't try to hide that by trying to cause a scene. I never said we didn't have boosters, just stating that if you guys didn't have gold and red to contain us, you wouldn't be as far as you would be. We decided not defend ourselves because it wasn't worth it at this point of the era. It's not even tick 500 lol. It's our last round and we expect to play the entire thing. On the NAPs, we never broke anything with Gold, our leaders decided on a certain axis, and we stuck by it. Gold was the one that constantly tried to expand on our side of the treaty line.
_________________ Wins: NWL, G1 e1 SoTF, E2 e7 SiCk!
|
|
Top |
|
Jumbalaya
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:30 pm |
|
Sergeant |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:08 pm Posts: 114
|
This is an interesting discussion lmao, looks like Blue pretty much has it locked up though it is still early but with Gold and Blue together it's pretty much done haha
|
|
Top |
|
ThyLastPenguin
|
Post subject: Re: F2 era SiCK, Poke alliances, and LODB n such Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:42 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:06 pm Posts: 39
|
We still shouldn't get too cocky. If Sick and LODB work together they can still give us a rough time if we're not careful.
_________________ ~Dan's Un-Official B*tch~
*Yao ming*
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|