aye im sure bt woulda been the ones who had die as multis who names were bashing bt and not the ones who got a lil bit of swing to get away with having multis.... js dont throw a stone at peeps without proof it was them that did it when it is really a lot easier to say that u were the ones who did it and by u being the ones to conquer them makes it even more appropiate to say they were your multis.. just for the record there lol... if u were on the outside looking in u would also see that what im saying is what u would think aswell..
Admin doesn't ban people without proof. I'm certain 'proof' is a lot more than just looking at names, too. Even if it is sometimes a pretty good indicator.
And just for the record... having a name dedicated to bashing a particular alliance, in my mind anyway, would make me believe that same alliance they are bashing, are the same person. An amateur trick, really. Much like when playing poker and wincing when the flop comes out, but you actually flopped a flush.