| Author |
Message |
|
edwin737
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub  Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:51 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm
Posts: 735
Location: fantasy
Gender: male
|
|
| Top |
|
|
inoofinqisition
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:10 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:47 pm
Posts: 42
Gender: male
|
jaepezmars wrote:
It was proved that IRON has weak ministers
not really
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Chivas0611
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:09 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:30 am
Posts: 54
Gender: female
|
Conclusion: Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
EosAStar
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:59 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 79
|
jaepezmars wrote: The simple matter of it is CE and NAM have got their plans down. (well NAM does, CE just follows orders, no real strategy in that except basic survival) They are a cohesive FORCE. They move when they are supposed to and divide up the battles.
All the other alliances against them have yet to work together on a great plan. There was a direct split in IRON's allies that let NAM and CE concentrate everything on taking down IRON and are now on their way to finish off the AA sector. IRON failed in keeping peace between those who would help and now NEW WORLD ORDERS will have to be formed to keep NAM or CE from winning as soon as relics come out.
It was proved that IRON has weak ministers and NAM found the right lackeys.
YOu can boost all you want but your not gunna stop 5 good alliances (one or two of whom will be pure sacrifice) who can COORDINATE. Seen it plenty of times in MARS and FANTASY but not in the EARTH realms so much...weird.
BTW to my enemies, i keep my immaturity to the BC and private messages not here on the forum. I would like to note that the only time CE units clashed with Iron units was tick 359 on Europe in a total loss for CE and Nam. (Iron left Europe the next tick). At this time 2 of the three members of CE that were involved in that suicide mission are now in Nam. As certain people have said on skype thanks for letting it be a one on one. No matter what BC said that is really what it was. Sure Nam killed a few of Irons subs armies before the big battle but that was by choice not because the sub attacked. Sure our allies clashed with each other but really the only attacks on Nam or Iron were done by the other.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Stoned2Assassin
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:13 pm |
|
| Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
|
Chivas0611 wrote: Conclusion: Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? and yet again another Nam player is an ass, though I will not judge the rest for these two incompetent fools who delight themselves in insulting the enemy even after the war.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Nickster64
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:51 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:50 pm
Posts: 28
Gender: male
|
jaepezmars wrote: All the other alliances against them have yet to work together on a great plan...now NEW WORLD ORDERS will have to be formed to keep NAM or CE from winning as soon as relics come out.
I'm sure Nam and CE have loyal allies and they aren't going to have to worry about anything like that, haha. The remaining allies of IRON are below the top 5, so the fact is there. The top 4 are Nam, CE, and allies. This "New World Order" can't happen if the forces contributing to it aren't strong enough to make a difference.
_________________
Nrod-Rodriguez-Nickster64
credz Maxattack for sig
|
|
| Top |
|
|
kimdylan16
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:15 pm |
|
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 7:46 pm
Posts: 72
Gender: male
|
|
| Top |
|
|
micheal
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:36 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:55 am
Posts: 104
Gender: male
|
Stoned2Assassin wrote: Chivas0611 wrote: Conclusion: Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? and yet again another Nam player is an ass, though I will not judge the rest for these two incompetent fools who delight themselves in insulting the enemy even after the war. i think chiva is right ... oh come on .. we cnqred 3-4 members with only spams ... that is really a shame lol
_________________
Most Crystals: 201
Highest power: 486 @tick200
Winning Alliances
FEAR, Hell, VVV, SoL, MOON,(The Elements), Nam, SWIM, PUFF, AL, nWo, V, DoG
Leader of HaHa #1
Watching worlds
Mars1
Earth2
Mars3
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Stoned2Assassin
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:13 pm |
|
| Specialist |
|
|
|
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
|
micheal wrote: Stoned2Assassin wrote: Chivas0611 wrote: Conclusion: Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? and yet again another Nam player is an ass, though I will not judge the rest for these two incompetent fools who delight themselves in insulting the enemy even after the war. i think chiva is right ... oh come on .. we cnqred 3-4 members with only spams ... that is really a shame lol lol they quit but either way you guys won and chivas is just being an ass.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
FlexLex24
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:10 pm |
|
| Private |
 |
|
|
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 12:38 am
Posts: 9
|
|
Finally got on the scoreboard... took out 80ish of morgans tanks
Can be conquered happy now
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
