Author |
Message |
ShadowReaperX
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:48 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:54 am Posts: 354 Gender: male
|
Umm its not fun if everytime we attack they retreat. So its not really competition...Easy for RDH since Ai likes to get owned by spies and also likes to leave there troops on a random OP. Thats how MERC died from Ais1
_________________ Winner of Championship Era 2014 (RDH) Most Power: 445 Most Crystals: 287 Most Kills: 62,190 Most Wreckages: 177
|
|
Top |
|
Ilona
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:29 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:02 pm Posts: 1770 Gender: female
|
never underestimate your enemy. Yes they got spy attacked but also they still have the double of score and also of units. If you think, we can just walk to them and get their crystals - You are wrong.
To be in war and defend, or to be in war and move to their hive is very different.
I won't celebrate a victory before i deserve one.
Hmmm and this time.... Well we will see. I don't mind losing my units in a fight is all i can say.
|
|
Top |
|
darkgambit
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:56 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:57 pm Posts: 2 Gender: male
|
Hmmm all this talk of I was not active, no I was not active is just ridicules I wasn't going to jump in the forum but after reading all this nonsense I feel I need to give my 2 cents No matter what anybody says about activity, everything can all be proven next round. This is my first era back to Battledawn in about 1- 2 years. Yes I was hoping for a nice big war to have fun with and I wasn't really on the side of a merge, however I decided to do whatever the final decision was. I knew people would have a problem with it but if it bothers you guys that much then please just be serious next round and lets all have a blood bath As for this round not being competitive and no BR I just want to say that it was a much harder war then it looked. its easy being on the outside looking in and there was a lot of blood shed on both sides. I just don't want to show a BR with 3-4 squads attacking each other, and even though thats not a lot I have like 50 of those, RDH you said yourself how there is a difference in a battle and going into a hive, that would have been suicide for the attack on both sides. this was a vary tactical war. in the end it was decided we cant beat each other without taking ourselves out of the running to win this round, which in my opinion is what its all about and RDH please take next round to the best of you guys abilitys so that we can all enjoy a great war And Finally to everyone in Mars 4 who feels there was a lack of compitition (myself included) lets all build a colony on every world and invite the best alliance of each world to join Mars 4 next round and we can have the most epic battle ever recorded on Battledawn, now dont that sound fun
|
|
Top |
|
punto666
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:23 pm |
|
Private 1st class |
|
|
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:37 pm Posts: 15
|
Agree 100% with darkgambit.
|
|
Top |
|
GerberBaby
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:35 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:54 am Posts: 30
|
gipsy wrote: Haven, I have several mails about negotiation with AI and also asking for our relic. Quote: I have proposed this to you before but what wold you think about negotiating a ceasefire with AI and then you can help us with the AL v UTM war. After AL falls UTM will have a short rebuilding time maybe 100 ticks and then we may jump into the war on whoevers side has helped us the most against AL or if neither helps whoever has been truer and more valuable allies. This was your last message. Hmmm this definitely sounds like demanding a ceasefire. If you look at the prvious messages I was actually doing the negotiations and got AI to agree to it but you just said that you didn't think that they would agree and didn't do anything after that. I never said we didn't attempt to get you guys to have an NAP with AI in fact I said we did. I just encourage Power to watch his word coice as we did not DEMAND for the NAP and we did not BEG for the relic. If I say, "hey can I have a cookie" it isn't begging it is asking there is a difference. Not only did he do that but he also said I got banned twice on M4 when I never once got banned and he said I got banned on ES server but left out that I did it to take out the number one alliance and give my alliance the opportunity to win and that as soon as I told th admin he let me go
|
|
Top |
|
mfreak
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:52 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 2757 Location: Chicago, Illinois Gender: male
|
Quote: As for this round not being competitive and no BR I just want to say that it was a much harder war then it looked. its easy being on the outside looking in and there was a lot of blood shed on both sides. I just don't want to show a BR with 3-4 squads attacking each other, and even though thats not a lot I have like 50 of those, RDH you said yourself how there is a difference in a battle and going into a hive, that would have been suicide for the attack on both sides. this was a vary tactical war. in the end it was decided we cant beat each other without taking ourselves out of the running to win this round, which in my opinion is what its all about Now Darkgambit dude, I am dissapointed. To all those who dont know, when I joined BD a couple of years back, Darkgambit was one of the first leaders I was under. I think we lost to Sky I am not very sure, where Sky was the alliance with the record breaking score. Now to call this a tactical war is laughable, without meaning to offend. If you lost 3-4 squads like 50 times, then you werent active or available enough to login, to move those squads, or those online didnt send enough defence. There will always be a lot of spam attacks, or full squad attacks here and there, youd have to manage all of that. Youd have to keep maneuvering until you split up your enemy and then kill them little by little. I never said, go head on with UTM and lose ur units. As for UTM, you guys saw that 3 members were banned. I dont even understand why someone would decide to merge, when you had the round won from that point on. Why not take them out, and conquer them and take crystals? How would squads of 12 members lose against squads of 9 members? Unless you guys had a really bad build.
_________________ Deadman - SYN ----------------
|
|
Top |
|
punto666
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:53 am |
|
Private 1st class |
|
|
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:37 pm Posts: 15
|
mfreak
The NAP was decided just before the A member get banned. We keep our word
|
|
Top |
|
darkgambit
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:57 am |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:57 pm Posts: 2 Gender: male
|
mfreak wrote: Quote: As for this round not being competitive and no BR I just want to say that it was a much harder war then it looked. its easy being on the outside looking in and there was a lot of blood shed on both sides. I just don't want to show a BR with 3-4 squads attacking each other, and even though thats not a lot I have like 50 of those, RDH you said yourself how there is a difference in a battle and going into a hive, that would have been suicide for the attack on both sides. this was a vary tactical war. in the end it was decided we cant beat each other without taking ourselves out of the running to win this round, which in my opinion is what its all about Now Darkgambit dude, I am dissapointed. To all those who dont know, when I joined BD a couple of years back, Darkgambit was one of the first leaders I was under. I think we lost to Sky I am not very sure, where Sky was the alliance with the record breaking score. Now to call this a tactical war is laughable, without meaning to offend. If you lost 3-4 squads like 50 times, then you werent active or available enough to login, to move those squads, or those online didnt send enough defence. There will always be a lot of spam attacks, or full squad attacks here and there, youd have to manage all of that. Youd have to keep maneuvering until you split up your enemy and then kill them little by little. I never said, go head on with UTM and lose ur units. As for UTM, you guys saw that 3 members were banned. I dont even understand why someone would decide to merge, when you had the round won from that point on. Why not take them out, and conquer them and take crystals? How would squads of 12 members lose against squads of 9 members? Unless you guys had a really bad build. I apologize however you misunderstand me,I did not say I lost all those fights. as a matter of fact I won damn near all of those fight and that can be proven if you check my profile and and see my units killed/ to units Death
|
|
Top |
|
ShadowReaperX
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:43 am |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:54 am Posts: 354 Gender: male
|
And Finally to everyone in Mars 4 who feels there was a lack of compitition (myself included) lets all build a colony on every world and invite the best alliance of each world to join Mars 4 next round and we can have the most epic battle ever recorded on Battledawn, now dont that sound fun [/quote] Now this is what im talking about. It's a good idea
_________________ Winner of Championship Era 2014 (RDH) Most Power: 445 Most Crystals: 287 Most Kills: 62,190 Most Wreckages: 177
|
|
Top |
|
branabus
|
Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:26 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:19 am Posts: 60
|
OK. Now why is Al masquerading as SYN?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|