Author |
Message |
psg188
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:59 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:18 pm Posts: 1410 Location: Georgia Tech Gender: male
|
Try reading for once... Quote: Even Michael, the game creator feels as though it is wrong to ban someone for faulty game mechanics, and says himself that this is what this issue revolves around. No one thinks banning for game faults is a good idea, Andrew simply caved to public scrutiny. Blaming cheating again, is simply your way of trying to dismiss someone better than you... which must make you very tired, having then the need to dismiss over half the population of BD. lol.
_________________ Kane - GLA - LoM - UBL - TdCt - Simp -------------- Beware the wrath of Ovaltine Jenkins, for he shall show no mercy.
|
|
Top |
|
trevor1601
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:37 pm |
|
Captain |
|
|
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:45 pm Posts: 939
|
Quote: even michael thinks kane is a 10 year old girl. see i can do it also
_________________
best round-SAGE E2 -312 power most conquers at one point-122
|
|
Top |
|
psg188
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:17 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:18 pm Posts: 1410 Location: Georgia Tech Gender: male
|
Except you're resorting to petty personal insults, while I have actual evidence. You make yourself look less informed with each new post.
_________________ Kane - GLA - LoM - UBL - TdCt - Simp -------------- Beware the wrath of Ovaltine Jenkins, for he shall show no mercy.
|
|
Top |
|
nelson419
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:58 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:13 pm Posts: 193 Location: Toledo, OH Gender: male
|
LoL @ better teams playing on double tick worlds.
Are you trying to be funny dude?
_________________ Redwurm aka Launchpad McQuack aka President Skroob aka a bunch of other stupid names I've been in a lot of alliances that have lost, and a couple that have won.
|
|
Top |
|
amatic
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:27 am |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:34 am Posts: 33 Gender: male
|
This is funny.
_________________ Back from retirement. XXX, TK, LoM, D, CRK, KSM, MGH, HINI, WIPE Highest Power: 182 Most Crystals: 105 Career Relic Count: 7 -Contempt of Apocalypse-
|
|
Top |
|
nelson419
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:44 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:13 pm Posts: 193 Location: Toledo, OH Gender: male
|
FYI, about the double tick = better teams.
I just joined a non single tick server and have already taken 11 guys I dont know and turned them into a 1st place alliance, all within a couple of days.
This would NOT have been possible on a single tick server.
Just sayin!
_________________ Redwurm aka Launchpad McQuack aka President Skroob aka a bunch of other stupid names I've been in a lot of alliances that have lost, and a couple that have won.
|
|
Top |
|
Mad MAX
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:44 am Posts: 247 Gender: male
|
1 tick worlds take more skill then 2tick worlds, ask any great player
2 tick and better, takes active and some skill
1 tick servers takes far longer for anything to happen its much harder to get lucky and take something, or someone when there offline.
In turn it takes a good plan to enter a hive on 1 tick servers, you cant wipe out half of an hive in a nite there for it is far more fun to play 1 tick servers.
2 tick servers are easy
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
AnitsuEx
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:56 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm Posts: 1275
|
Mad MAX summed it up pretty well, and hey, are you back?
_________________ 【Wins】 - 【12】 【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】 【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】 【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】
|
|
Top |
|
Mad MAX
|
Post subject: Re: SoL not trying? Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:49 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:44 am Posts: 247 Gender: male
|
i may make a short run on some world some were, not sure i am good enough to play an 1 tick server well XD
Were ever i play i hope for epic battles of old cleint with a few top alliances with a wars that last a few hunderd ticks or thousand ticks. like bd was ment to be played
When bd ment something not like this new cleint easy sweep of an server or servers.
bd has become a bit 1 sided and less fun then it once was. but i hear there has been a few changes and it may be what bd needed to get that old cleint edge of your seat feel.
Dont get me worng i had fun the frist few times i killed an server but after that it lost it luster.
Dont take it the worng way i play to win, when u win with little fight it takes the fun from the game, the life from the play, the meaning of the win is worthless and empty.
Kinda like the lack of fight people are talking about here.
That is just my toughts not puting anyone down, just stateing how i feel and many others feel the same way.
Thats why bd has lost so many of its greatest players pilars of bd.
I know there working on it and i thank the makers for that but changes cant come fast enough for many.
Bd used to very hard, few perfect wins on old cleint, many wins were had from reaching time limit.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|