It is currently Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:13 pm 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 1770
Gender: female
LOL

yeah, we log in sometimes and yes we move squads but that has absolutely nothing to do with "playing serious"
As Allen said, if we would play serious - i doubt an alliance like AI with all this damage units would be high ranked... or some others.

I have only ingame recruits and a few SYN members are with me. Thats all.
RDH isn't SYN. I am not there as gipsy and we don't aim for the win.
We just get provoked all the time and have to react.

Sometimes I wish we would be more active, boost some blue tokens and kick some ehm ..
This era has 0 competition. Its one of the most boring I ever saw.
And you guys made it to that.
I am pretty sure, that you will attack us right after tick 2000.
Well you can add 50 ticks delay so maybe you have 4-5 members then ... :lol:


Sorry for sounding arrogant like this. But blaming us for be to active as inactive is just lame.
1 look to the player statics is enough. On mine is units killed : 12.000
At UTM members is an average of 3.000

You can imagine that the cost for rebuilding armor is the main reason that we are ranked 6.
Well, go and take our relic at tick 2000. Seems to be the only fight you guys are able to


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:21 pm 
Major
Major
User avatar
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am
Posts: 2757
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Gender: male
Quote:
So we should merge with a worse alliance? If a merger strengthens the alliance what is wrong with it? Its not like there aren't any other alliances we can fight in this era.


Pfff this guy dont understand :? I MEANT, merge with any allies you have, NOT with the dudes you are fighting for gods sakes!! Then what is the point of a damn war?!! So you both build, some get banned, then you just exchange people with relics and win an era!! YAY!!

Now coming back to RDH, we arent gonna win the era, nor do we intend to. Like gipsy said, we simply fight back those that attack us. To say we are active is laughable, you havent really seen my activity or anyone in RDH :P

And Shadow, you should know that if I was active, Id atleast get my alliance rank right :lol:

_________________
Deadman - SYN
----------------
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:22 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:47 pm
Posts: 35
well, this is too much talking, i just want some BRs doesnt matter of who... lol so here you go, MERC started taking our OPs from a long time ago and besides our warnings he didnt listen... so we had to take again our OPs by force, and thi is the result

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

poor guy from 3 bars to 2 stripes


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:48 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:30 pm
Posts: 371
ShadowReaperX wrote:
RDH all i here is "blah blah we are not serious blah blah."

Attacking a relic with all 12 people is serious and you say your activity is low? THATS BULLSHANZ, don't even try with that because i see you guys all day moving your squads and looking for attacks.. Getting all those battle reports OBVIOUSLY means you are active...

If you were truly not serious you wouldn't even bother getting to 5th place, a relic, or even allies. But i see you guys talking to people and stuff...

You one of the most active alliances on here so don't try with this "not serious" business again cause if i wasn't serious i would get on like 1 time in 2 days..


If we were serious you would have seen us start from tick 1 not tick 800.
AnitsuEx wrote:
I believe if I were to play this era, and had organized an alliance, you guys would not have known what would have hit you

No lies.

Too bad, M4 is not my thing.

Let's look back at my siggy of my wins, some record breaking, wins without boosting, hm, hm, yes I believe all my wins were earned through wars, unlike mergers like yours.

I believe this will be your first win Haven?

First win and yet such a horrible way to win
You guys made probably a dozen or so plans to attack AL but yet your final plan was a merger, how disappointing.

AnitSu is a high calibre player regardless of whether or not he uses red tokens he's still a very skilled player. Haven you were banned twice if I'm not mistaken for "language" supposedly although on ES you were banned for farming which carried over onto main server. You can deny that all you want but your own team mate and Dani17 the one that was banned with you had said. AL and UTM had several bans over the course of this era many of which I'm sure wasn't cheating mainly just language but we all know that the last 3 bans on AL wasn't language. Think before you type.

The bottom line is, M4 had no competition this era. At the beginning it had potential but from leaders disbanding in the west and the AL vs UTM war lasting over 1500 ticks with no action you can't convince anyone that this was a competitive era. Never is it glorified to merge with the enemy alliance and you're ignorant to think that's the best method to win an era. You're very unskilled and inexperienced to consider that offer and I had a lot of respect for many AL players until they took this offer.

UTM clearly had an advantage over AL in the activity and power department but they were not as strategic which is why I'm guessing they had offered this "out" to AL for a very sad victory. AL was just outnumbered and their active members were slowly diminishing don't blame them for wanting easy victory tokens it's just a disgrace.

For UTM to declare war on AI after the merge and after we have done all the work is a funny motion to me. They beg us to hand over the relic ever since we get it and then try demanding us to NAP with AI to get our support to fight AL which did not happen. Attacking AI now is your only way of actually looking good, even though you have done absolutely nothing but conquer and take crystals this whole round. That's not how you make a name for yourself. This stunt you pulled won't earn you anything but the tokens. You each have lost the concept of what a war game is all about. Yes, it requires strategy but it also requires you to earn the victory not just prolong it enough so that both sides are inactive then merge and high five one another.

On a more serious note next M4 will be just the same as this, terrible. There has never really been any serious competition on this world and if you guys really want to make a name for yourself in the HoF you should look into visiting an Earth world or M3 as those are typically more serious.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:27 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:54 am
Posts: 30
Anarchist69x wrote:
ShadowReaperX wrote:
RDH all i here is "blah blah we are not serious blah blah."

Attacking a relic with all 12 people is serious and you say your activity is low? THATS BULLSHANZ, don't even try with that because i see you guys all day moving your squads and looking for attacks.. Getting all those battle reports OBVIOUSLY means you are active...

If you were truly not serious you wouldn't even bother getting to 5th place, a relic, or even allies. But i see you guys talking to people and stuff...

You one of the most active alliances on here so don't try with this "not serious" business again cause if i wasn't serious i would get on like 1 time in 2 days..


If we were serious you would have seen us start from tick 1 not tick 800.
AnitsuEx wrote:
I believe if I were to play this era, and had organized an alliance, you guys would not have known what would have hit you

No lies.

Too bad, M4 is not my thing.

Let's look back at my siggy of my wins, some record breaking, wins without boosting, hm, hm, yes I believe all my wins were earned through wars, unlike mergers like yours.

I believe this will be your first win Haven?

First win and yet such a horrible way to win
You guys made probably a dozen or so plans to attack AL but yet your final plan was a merger, how disappointing.

AnitSu is a high calibre player regardless of whether or not he uses red tokens he's still a very skilled player. Haven you were banned twice if I'm not mistaken for "language" supposedly although on ES you were banned for farming which carried over onto main server. You can deny that all you want but your own team mate and Dani17 the one that was banned with you had said. AL and UTM had several bans over the course of this era many of which I'm sure wasn't cheating mainly just language but we all know that the last 3 bans on AL wasn't language. Think before you type.

The bottom line is, M4 had no competition this era. At the beginning it had potential but from leaders disbanding in the west and the AL vs UTM war lasting over 1500 ticks with no action you can't convince anyone that this was a competitive era. Never is it glorified to merge with the enemy alliance and you're ignorant to think that's the best method to win an era. You're very unskilled and inexperienced to consider that offer and I had a lot of respect for many AL players until they took this offer.

UTM clearly had an advantage over AL in the activity and power department but they were not as strategic which is why I'm guessing they had offered this "out" to AL for a very sad victory. AL was just outnumbered and their active members were slowly diminishing don't blame them for wanting easy victory tokens it's just a disgrace.

For UTM to declare war on AI after the merge and after we have done all the work is a funny motion to me. They beg us to hand over the relic ever since we get it and then try demanding us to NAP with AI to get our support to fight AL which did not happen. Attacking AI now is your only way of actually looking good, even though you have done absolutely nothing but conquer and take crystals this whole round. That's not how you make a name for yourself. This stunt you pulled won't earn you anything but the tokens. You each have lost the concept of what a war game is all about. Yes, it requires strategy but it also requires you to earn the victory not just prolong it enough so that both sides are inactive then merge and high five one another.

On a more serious note next M4 will be just the same as this, terrible. There has never really been any serious competition on this world and if you guys really want to make a name for yourself in the HoF you should look into visiting an Earth world or M3 as those are typically more serious.


Actually nope we never demanded for you guys to NAP with AI. I was organizing an NAP with both sides so that AI and RDH and UTM would then all gang up on AL. I asked montana if she would go along with it if I got AI to accept. AAll she said was that she didn't think AI would accept it. You must be really out of the loop then since you have only a vague understanding of what is going on in this era. We did not demand for you to NAP with AI. Also you should know that AL was much more active then UTM and that was the issue as I said previously. Also I don't know about any begging for the relic but that had nothing to do with most of us. I remember something about Mig saying that you guys said you would hand over the relic if we got 9 of them but I know MiG and we did not beg. He probably did try to ask though but there is a difference between begging and asking. If you can't figure that out by now then you should probably get a dictionary.

Actually I was never banned on M4. So you are definitely mistaken and I already corrected you in your BC. The only member of any UTM alliance before the merger to be banned was Imtr and that was for language and it was supposed to be a 3 hour ban however the admin accidentally marked it as a perma ban and later apologized to Imtr.

Yes I was banned on Spanish server for multi farming but it was a strategy. I was messaging with Dani and Twig and got them to say over messaging how they got so many conquers by multi farming and the admin banned all of them and me. So I took out the rank 1 alliance without losing a single troop. It awas originally a permanant ban but I explained what I did to the admin and he freed me. This I also explained to you. Isn't it convenient how you are leaving all of this out. Hmmm.

I don't care about making a name for myself I have made a name for myself in M2, F2, and F6. I don't need to make a name for myself by doing a merger. I did a merger bc I have friends on both sides. Because it was a smart move. We have no competition in this era because you guys could not step up and give us any so almost all of us stopped boosting.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:34 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1275
If your friends knew how to play this game, you would know to keep battledawn and the era it holds out of friendship and let the wars fly as they would.

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:12 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 1770
Gender: female
Haven, I have several mails about negotiation with AI and also asking for our relic.

Quote:
I have proposed this to you before but what wold you think about negotiating a ceasefire with AI and then you can help us with the AL v UTM war. After AL falls UTM will have a short rebuilding time maybe 100 ticks and then we may jump into the war on whoevers side has helped us the most against AL or if neither helps whoever has been truer and more valuable allies.


This was your last message.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:44 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:54 am
Posts: 354
Gender: male
We are considering moving to another world also, and haven is right, there is no competition because u guys are "not serious."

I will challenge anyone to attack us. I can guarantee nobody would of beat us even with our low activity. All of you saw bobby attacking us and i had no troops on my colony. Before the shield was up i had over 150 squads...

So step it up or do whatever next era so we can actually have fun and play this game. Invite everyone so we can have a nice round of BD, and some COMPETITION. I want some BR before this era and 100 times more next era.

Technically we were not serious too, because we didn't wake up in the middle of the night for BD, we just went with the flow and attacked when we were provoked like you guys. I rarely used blues so yeah our less seriousness beats yours, the win is just extra which didn't really matter to us as long as we had fun.(Which is the point of battle dawn and games in general)

And last,Who attacks a relic with 12 people and say they aren't active? (I'ill give u the answer, RDH)

And can we please stop this debate because it's just our word against yours.

_________________
Winner of Championship Era 2014 (RDH)
Most Power: 445
Most Crystals: 287
Most Kills: 62,190
Most Wreckages: 177

Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:46 pm 
Private
Private
 Profile

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:38 pm
Posts: 1
u guys did have competition, u just decided to merge with it


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: UTM, UTMb,UTMe,GALA and other allies vs AL and subs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:25 pm 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 1770
Gender: female
xiajohn wrote:
u guys did have competition, u just decided to merge with it



wise words :)

- move on


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl