i never lead nml .lol twoface or kiki gave u second hand man control. [Removed]. so u have no room to talk. my point exactly carl.. u judge me yet you've only seen me play 2 times -_-.. get reall "Kiddo"

Do not evade the swering filter.

-Tom.

2 eras is by far ennough, i mean you build Damage units. that just about does it for me. before you make some stupid excuse, last era we had an argument for about an hour because at tick 1500 you had as much damage as range.

about not leading NML. Kiki put me in charge whenever he was offline, so i was in full control at that point, and i handed that control to you for 10 ticks, 6 ticks into your lead we had lost the war due to a dumb decision which you say was not a mistake.

and lol

Damage units are not bad if you have the armor to protect them. The best combo to use is actually 10 A, 10 D and 10 R inf if u run a battle report the one with 20 R and 10 A inf and the 10:10:10 build kill each other however the 10:10:10 one was cheaper to build. However if you are outnumbered then it is better the have the 20 R and 10 A combo

LOL Essence talks like he worked for my army? just saying. im done arguing see you all in 2 eras.

if im in an alliance with anyone who builds that i would quit, or have them kicked. you are not seeing the big picture....

10 Armour 20 Range is better than 10 armour 10 damage and 10 range. the damage has to live till round 3 to deal more damage than the range, which it does not in pritty much EVERY scenario.

ask any good player, log onto E1 and ask people if damage should be in any army i garentee you anyone who knows what they are talking about will laugh at the idea.

Incidently i asked a good player for you here is the convosation:

[23:11:55] Carl Riggs: anyone know a fast way of explaining to somone why not to use damage units?
[23:11:56] Joel Heikkilä: xD
[23:12:04] Joel Heikkilä: Because they suck.
[23:12:18] Joel Heikkilä: Alternatively: They don't deal as much damage as range.

"2 eras is by far ennough, i mean you build Damage units. that just about does it for me. before you make some stupid excuse, last era we had an argument for about an hour because at tick 1500 you had as much damage as range."

im ignorant to where that makes me sound like im in "your army". whats this army men were a load of green plastic men running about? Dibs on the one with the rocket launcher!

Essence just do a battle simulator with 10 A 10 D and 10R v 10A and 20 R itll be a tie. I'll still build range just bc in larger fights they do better but in smaller fights damage is more affective

i know what happens when you sim it, in small fights it is not "more" effective, it is less, if you are fighting against somone who has more units that you.... for instance if you fight against 10 Armour inf, and 25 range inf.... and you have 10 armour, 10 damage and 10 range, you will kill less than if you have 10 armour and 20 range. thats why range > damage you deal more damage although 1v1 it is a draw, in other fights range is better.

Carl~

That is exactly what I said in the first message about this lol. with the damage and range it is exactly as effective if u use the ssame amount of troops as ur opponent and is cheaper. However igf ur facing a larger army then the ranged one is more effective.

No this looks like the opposit to what you said, depending on if you meant larger as in every fight? By larger i meant like 6000Vs6000 battles.

Carl~

Well then... im just strolling by and watching this convo.