maikalal wrote:
clownking wrote:
anyone notice its tick 384. that 383 ticks we have been telling lazy to move. you think we don't know the minute we planned to head out on map that lazy would give us headaches
Mate u didn't disclose what u have been doing for last 383 ticks or what plans u have for the rest of the era can't blame us for that... but we do have konvict's messages accusing u (thanks to Langy) unless we know more we can only be biased towards the oppressed rather than the oppresor...
clownking wrote:
its not unknown that I do not like kon. he is a terrible player who would sell his own mother for 200 power and I have no time for him but yet I still gave him a chance to move and therefore not die.
not really interested in your personal issues...
clownking wrote:
bottom line this is a war game muff needs to secure their area and lazy as much as they wanna cry about it could not be trusted.
Yes its a battle game... but a strategic battle game... not a muscular one... so u can't win by physical force... and are u saying that no one should trust you and should have attacked u from the very first?
clownking wrote:
all they had to do was relocate elsewhere and not build gates and silos within in range and they would have been allowed to live.
Sounds more like u failed to make urself clear to them... aslo if I have to go by hutchydog's account that they were here first and then u joined and asked for a NAP for a specified no. of ticks
Now u r actually killing them now at your leirsure...before the end of NAP... that makes u a traitor...
clownking wrote:
everyone including tbc would have done exactly the same. so tbc you cant get all high and mighty you forget I have played with a lot of your members and know the mentality.
Irrelevant bringing TBC into this... we are just trying to analyse your words and worth of it... and yes they are very clear about their wants... so no misunderstanding in the mid era.... and personal attacks are only making it worse... u r sliding deep into ditch dug by urself...
clownking wrote:
in regards to grey where we supposed to let you into our hive to kill him? would you really have done the same if shoe was on other foot? and ask celene or better yet Toma as he knows me better that if I say we did not command him to attack anyone whether or not I would be telling truth!!
first of all u shudn't have invited him... sheltering him when RtD was attacking IDK meant breach of contract with RtD right then...(I wont comment any more on this... not my area)
secondly its upon u too control rogue members and kill them... instead u sat back and enjoyed the show even helping him jamming OPs while he was jammed all the while... or if u decide to kick him without doing anything... then don't do anything... u got no right on the crystals of his when u didn't kill him... leave him be... cud have politely asked him to relocate from ur hive to avoid confrontation with TBC...
This isn't a interview where u r giving references... everyone on the server knows each other somehow that doesn't mean we have to keep asking around about them...
clownking wrote:
has everyone forgotten this is a war game?
Lets enjoy it fair and square and face it like brave knights
PS:
This were my personal views it doesn't concern my Alliance (whatever it is)[/quote]
personally I gave no order for grey to attack just like bpb did not give an order. as for jamming no jamming was done by muff and accusations unfounded are just that accusations. However TBC jammed our entire hive to ensure they got 2 relics possibly another unfounded accustion but hey if everyone else is throwing them around why not me.
grey aside.... our plans are our plans we are under no compulsory order to divulge our plans to anyone just as I would not expect tbc to divulge their plans to us.
to cope this much heat because we have chosen to remove a direct threat from our hive is ridiculous as no one in their right mind would allow it and if you say tbc would then that is blatant lie as I for one know Celene would not allow it.
as for giving greys crystals. you can act all high and mighty but there is no chance in a million years tbc would have allowed us to have crystals if shoe was on other foot.
there is a big difference to surprise attacking an alliance and spending 380 ticks telling them to move. I don't care what our relationship is like if an alliance we don't trust builds gates into our hive and wont remove them. that relationship will break down.
so feel bad for lazy or don't but it is bad strategy for us to allow them to live as if we did they would attack us the 1st chance they get.
not sure why this is so hard to understand!
ps hutchy like I said I had respect for you as I like warriors and thought you where one. but you losing your cool over this considering your lack of background knowledge and incapability of playing the game proves my point.
I am not a fan of the hatred either but wont lose sleep over you having no respect for me mikial. we declared fair square on an enemy alliance who had intentions to attack us. was no sneak attack was no underhanded tactics. now we cope all this hatred becuase we wouldn't let lazy take advantage of us. no reason for hatred and anger. lets fight play the game does not benifit anyone to hurtle insults around this forum room!
cheers