Il glady say that I will break a NAP with a neautral power in order to serve my allies.
Im that type of person.
My allies are more important to me, than someone who is not ready to become my friend and instead offfer me a stalling agreement

If my allies ask me for help, i will help.
simple
ur either friend or foe in battledawn
You decide

Well said. Unfortunately, some here value their ranking in a game over a commitment to allies

A pity, to say the least

Some people value their word and promises to others, seems you do not.

Marissassdad...UTM is the last alliance that should talk about allies. You guys were the first people to ignore us. We helped you take out SAGA and all you said was a thanks.

When SYN was in trouble, I'm sure your 3.6k units coulda helped them out atleast. If that was the case, we would have let the relic through. But of course, UTM decides to IGNORE SYN completely.

UTM decides not to update XIII about current standings and changes with alliances forcing us to waste 50k oil and precious time. UTM complaining about how XIII, SYN, UNZ didn't help out...well, it's cause UTM didn't give us ANY battleplans to help out on. UTM didn't inform us of ANYTHING.

You protected us? Who'd you protect us from? MupT? We had a NAP with them. SAGA? Oh wait, they were at your doorsteps. We took them out for you, saving you resources and time.

We were eager to help out, but UTM broke our alliance. This applies ONLY to UTM, not GA/LAWL. As far as I know, GA/LAWL are legitimate alliances and maybe we should have worked with them instead of UTM, but UTM has communication problems with their allies.

UTM didn't hold SYN/UNZ/XIII as an ally. It seemed they just wanted to keep us at bay. I will make SURE they regret it.

Right now, we're with MupT and we're loving it. All three alliances are pumped to exact their revenge on UTM.

Exia