Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

Sexybeast42 · **Posted:** Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:54 pm

bfan8475 wrote:

And no one knows us... people will add a sub of WCA that runs away but no one adds us into anything

Happy?

serenity54 · **Joined:** Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:25 pm **Posts:** 15

princekael2 wrote:

@talyn this is directed soley at you. How much do you preach against backstab? how much do you hate me for doing it? next time my friend, i wont hesitate out of respect for you, as i did before.

No way to answer bro, but funny that troop buildup around certain parts of the border on the exclusion zone by your team. Lets be real bro it was just a matter of time.

Gaurav · **Posted:** Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:38 am

PIN kill on WCA

Ukraine also lost another 7 squads to traps. Killed by KM.

11 Socc squads dead

Lionheart13 · **Joined:** Wed May 16, 2012 6:49 pm **Posts:** 39

Apollo wrote:

Yeah, we backstabbed. I don't think there's any in KM that will deny that. We saw an opportunity to attack, and we took it. [...]

A quote for the future.

redwurm · **Posted:** Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:30 pm

If you think any of us would give a crap about using that as a quote, you really underestimate how little we care about most of your guys' opinions of us.

Just another note, all this bad mouthing Talyn on the forums and BC for joining us...its pretty simple. Talyn's responses on the forum and overall demeanor is what made US choose to invite him in. Talyn turned us down a couple times before he finally joined. So please everyone keep in mind it was OUR idea to invite him in, not him asking us.

So stop with the BS and carry on with the war.

Sexybeast42 · **Posted:** Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:39 pm

Feel free to quote me on it, lol. You guys were having problems internally and we saw the chance to attack, so we took it. I see nothing wrong with what we did. Maybe a few years ago when I wasn't as mature of a player and person I would have complained. But guess what? This is battledawn. Not Battlehugs. We weren't going to accept a relic hand-over so this is the only other way to win. War.

Tyrano · **Joined:** Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:26 pm **Posts:** 63

Apollo wrote:

Feel free to quote me on it, lol. You guys were having problems internally and we saw the chance to attack, so we took it. I see nothing wrong with what we did. Maybe a few years ago when I wasn't as mature of a player and person I would have complained. But guess what? This is battledawn. Not Battlehugs. We weren't going to accept a relic hand-over so this is the only other way to win. War.

I wont say no to your argument, game is about war... but surely, a pact is to be respected at all. If not... why made it in the first point? You guys just made a pact so you could recover from war and then declare on us :3...

Its a fact, not theory. We cant complain about it, but wont forget, because this is what war is about... betrayals will be known and honorable people will be known. You may win this era because of your betrayal... but who knows what will happen on a next one :3...

Sexybeast42 · **Posted:** Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:35 am

The thing is, NAPs are only as good as they are to you. Meaning that when the NAP no longer serves it's purpose, why bother with upholding it? Sure, maybe it was "not honorable", but it was a legitimate tactic that so far has paid off for us. Why should we give our enemy time to regroup and rebuild ESPECIALLY when they have chassis advantage? The sooner the better.

Milanos · **Joined:** Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm **Posts:** 2047

If by now you haven't figured out that an alliance with Matt is going to break their NAP you really might as well quit :lol:

You can quote him on what he said, I think it's about the 5th time he posts this on the forum. Same goes for Red, same goes for Allen (Deadman).

Sexybeast42 · **Posted:** Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:33 am

^ Pretty much

KM/COL/PIN/PM vs WCA/SWAT/EQUM/FIFA/RoE/Socc/WCAs/WCAb