It is currently Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:02 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:26 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 4:07 am
Posts: 71
awesome109 wrote:
to BYZ and AOE . yu guys shuld stop the war and focus on other strong alliances . its better yu work together then apart . the only valid reason yu guys ar at war is MISCOMMUNICATION . both didnt listen.

wish yu guys the best :D and remebr .. die with a smile :)

regards Alcatraz


@Alcatraz it would be great to work together with BYZ again but i don't think it will happen. AoE trusted and respected BYZ but BYZ doesn't return the favor to us by respecting us and trusting us.

It was just 1 OP BYZ if you want an to take i will let you conquer my OP if it will make you happy xD. But my point is BYZ never respected us like last era. We help them attack BoS and LOIC and help them get 10 relics 24 ticks later they declare war on my alliance and stops us from taking 3rd place.

_________________
-Byeheart

Navy, ICE, NG, SOLD, HF, ZOMB


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:13 am 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:16 am
Posts: 25
setting the real fact: an in your face rebuttals to Dr. Bone Head

if strategy attacked a single op near AoE hive would it be a declaration of war against BYZ? Is this just a mis understanding? Common BYZ you attack an allied for just an op? you should consider that strategy was not present last era, you guys should have at least known it was just a minor mishap that could be straighten up with a good diplomatic talks, but you guys did not.

Just before BYZ formally attacked AoE,
BYZ tman attacked AoE ops, I message him:

http://prntscr.com/235bhf
and he replied
http://prntscr.com/235cgk

then :
BYZ attacks AoE sub for reason I was not aware of, I tried to mediate in behalf of AoE sub, I even message our sub not to attacked BYZ back cause I am mediating, (Garfield and Blah can attest to it) I message Rocas, Constantinous and nighthawk to know whats the attack all about and how can it be avoided here is proof:

http://prntscr.com/235e8j
http://prntscr.com/235erh
http://prntscr.com/235f88

they never replied back, clearly they have no good intention against AoE. Dr. Bones I challenge you, supply a printscreen of their reply to me regarding avoiding the war or any reply to me, if you can supply me then AoE is the backstabber no question ask no more arguments but if you cant supply me with the printscreen then you are clearly lying and misleading the readers of this forum so shut the F#%$@ up man up and say your a liar.

after this BYZ with leader attacked AoE .

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly you admit that you attack AoE sub because your paranoid of AoE sub will cut your main fleet, and I quote:

“BYZ took some AOE's sub tactical OPs :>Since AOE sub had serious infras in BYZ hive and some network in UK.While BYZ was in GL its a clear danger that could cut main fleets from the home-land and unsecured hive left behind for a mercy of people that clearly hypocrites”

You don’t do that to allied teams. we trusted BYZ to be allied but it seems you don’t trust us. You’re the hypocrite eat your own words bone head.

“BYZ helped to AOE last era to secure top rank and shared the spoils of war even after AOE was neutral all era long and joined the war when BOSS was deadly weak.Still BYZ considered AOE as brothers in arms”


Don’t point your finger if 4 of your fingers all points to you, looks whose talking, you guys sat down from the beginning of this era and you just joined BYZ lately. Give credit to AoE , if we didn’t join you last the outcome of last era war could go the other way around, BoS was not deadly weak at that time, they even warned me that BYZ cannot be trusted and BYZ would backstab AoE and you guys did backstab us this era. And one thing more you guys attacked our sub last era too just because they changed name and make it as an excuse to attacked them since they have no more affiliation with AoE.

” but instead of solving this matter of taking BYZ OP and fight with AOE sub what they did?>Attacked BYZ without a warning like thiefs at night.No doubt here that the act of treason is on AOE side”

Are you nuts you’re team is the aggressor and did an act of treason against AoE don’t bend the truth.

“Its funny how other alliance now killing your sub and you dont respond...so its was just BYZ that you wanted but was looking for good excuseLame,very lame tactic!”


You really are nuts , you have to visit a psychiatrist right now, how could we help them if we cant even defend ourselves? Don’t be stupid you’re a doctor but you have brains of a bone shirororororrororoh!!! Boom!!!

theres no doubt BYZ will win over AoE, I accepted that we lost this era but don’t bend the truth, the argument was who attacked first with the intention to kill or to wage war.

“p.s. you can keep BC and talk how much you want , say whatever you like .But you cannot change the fact that AOE leaders made a bad call for all your members”

clearly our leader made mistake on trusting you guys and re-assuring me personally that BYZ wont attack AoE.

this will serve as a warning for other players that BYZ especially their leader cannot be trusted. if other players says BYZ cannot be trusted and they have the tendency to backstab, they maybe right, we should listen. …. Boom again!!! lol


Last edited by rendecute on Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:23 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:17 am 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3362
Gender: male
For future refrence avoid the use of blue text, it is reserved for mods.

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:13 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:16 am
Posts: 25
Korupt wrote:
For future refrence avoid the use of blue text, it is reserved for mods.


sorry about that i wasnt aware of it, it was made available to my font colour gallery


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:11 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 4:07 am
Posts: 71
rendecute wrote:
setting the real fact: an in your face rebuttals to Dr. Bone Head

if strategy attacked a single op near AoE hive would it be a declaration of war against BYZ? Is this just a mis understanding? Common BYZ you attack an allied for just an op? you should consider that strategy was not present last era, you guys should have at least known it was just a minor mishap that could be straighten up with a good diplomatic talks, but you guys did not.

Just before BYZ formally attacked AoE,
BYZ tman attacked AoE ops, I message him:

http://prntscr.com/235bhf
and he replied
http://prntscr.com/235cgk

then :
BYZ attacks AoE sub for reason I was not aware of, I tried to mediate in behalf of AoE sub, I even message our sub not to attacked BYZ back cause I am mediating, (Garfield and Blah can attest to it) I message Rocas, Constantinous and nighthawk to know whats the attack all about and how can it be avoided here is proof:

http://prntscr.com/235e8j
http://prntscr.com/235erh
http://prntscr.com/235f88

they never replied back, clearly they have no good intention against AoE. Dr. Bones I challenge you, supply a printscreen of their reply to me regarding avoiding the war or any reply to me, if you can supply me then AoE is the backstabber no question ask no more arguments but if you cant supply me with the printscreen then you are clearly lying and misleading the readers of this forum so shut the F#%$@ up man up and say your a liar.

after this BYZ with leader attacked AoE .

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly you admit that you attack AoE sub because your paranoid of AoE sub will cut your main fleet, and I quote:

“BYZ took some AOE's sub tactical OPs :>Since AOE sub had serious infras in BYZ hive and some network in UK.While BYZ was in GL its a clear danger that could cut main fleets from the home-land and unsecured hive left behind for a mercy of people that clearly hypocrites”

You don’t do that to allied teams. we trusted BYZ to be allied but it seems you don’t trust us. You’re the hypocrite eat your own words bone head.

“BYZ helped to AOE last era to secure top rank and shared the spoils of war even after AOE was neutral all era long and joined the war when BOSS was deadly weak.Still BYZ considered AOE as brothers in arms”


Don’t point your finger if 4 of your fingers all points to you, looks whose talking, you guys sat down from the beginning of this era and you just joined BYZ lately. Give credit to AoE , if we didn’t join you last the outcome of last era war could go the other way around, BoS was not deadly weak at that time, they even warned me that BYZ cannot be trusted and BYZ would backstab AoE and you guys did backstab us this era. And one thing more you guys attacked our sub last era too just because they changed name and make it as an excuse to attacked them since they have no more affiliation with AoE.

” but instead of solving this matter of taking BYZ OP and fight with AOE sub what they did?>Attacked BYZ without a warning like thiefs at night.No doubt here that the act of treason is on AOE side”

Are you nuts you’re team is the aggressor and did an act of treason against AoE don’t bend the truth.

“Its funny how other alliance now killing your sub and you dont respond...so its was just BYZ that you wanted but was looking for good excuseLame,very lame tactic!”


You really are nuts , you have to visit a psychiatrist right now, how could we help them if we cant even defend ourselves? Don’t be stupid you’re a doctor but you have brains of a bone shirororororrororoh!!! Boom!!!

theres no doubt BYZ will win over AoE, I accepted that we lost this era but don’t bend the truth, the argument was who attacked first with the intention to kill or to wage war.

“p.s. you can keep BC and talk how much you want , say whatever you like .But you cannot change the fact that AOE leaders made a bad call for all your members”

clearly our leader made mistake on trusting you guys and re-assuring me personally that BYZ wont attack AoE.

this will serve as a warning for other players that BYZ especially their leader cannot be trusted. if other players says BYZ cannot be trusted and they have the tendency to backstab, they maybe right, we should listen. …. Boom again!!! lol



Not Good

_________________
-Byeheart

Navy, ICE, NG, SOLD, HF, ZOMB


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:44 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:35 am
Posts: 9
Gender: male
@Byeheart

There is an old say in BD and life:
"Sometimes you win and sometimes you learn"
Your theory about us chasing 3rd rank is kinda wrong,most funny is the part you said we want the 500 or something tokens as reward...Really? Ohh man,its to funny..lol

As for last era,I think you learned a lesson that hidding behind an ally flag doesnt gives you the right to snip and kill friendly sqds, day after day.And YOU know what im talking about exactly my friend. ;P

Now for this dude DAME,...he is dead!
:D

Im not sure that i can follow after all the siquence of events here,but ill try and please correct me if im wrong:

All this agression started around lil after tick 1000.

As you said by your self here:BYZ gave 12 ticks warning to all AOE and subs about
AOE, OPs that BYZ will take,due the heat of the battle and the fact that we never changed any of your subs colors to enemy,one of BYZ members sent by mistake few rouge attacks on AOE main.Something that was solved pretty fast.

And even more..Around tick 1050 all BYZ attacks was canceled and recalled.Leaders was talking about agreement that the OPs we took will be givven back and will be erazed and we can finish this fast.

But NO,it didnt happened simply because Strategy and Nobody couldnt shut up and stop insulting all BYZ members(As one of them keep doing here and thinks we will waste time to respond to his BS..lol).All this while they kept attacking our network in Africa and Aussie.In that point I guess it was way to late to go back.

I personally know that not Tony and not Zoe wanted this...And still I cant understand this,Not only as BYZ member,Not only why you attacked BYZ,but why after so many chances to stop this you kept attacking?You cant handle with a single punch and you go to fight a war with BYZ?

Anyway, Im sure If Tony or Colin will find time to clear some of the facts ,it will help to see the big picture much better.

All I want is to keep my "JW" title this era and have my sweat dreams without BYZ calling me to move here or defend that...crap!
:D


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:53 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:16 am
Posts: 25
@djigite

Since you mentioned me in your message to byeheart I will but in,

I don’t know about the theory of rank 3rd your talking about , I never mentioned anything about it so I assume this is for byeheart to anwer you,

I assume you’re the ever powerful constantinus since only dr bones and constantinus have the JW in their name, JW stands for just watching , it’s a misnomer, if your playing BD and you claimed to be JW then don’t do anything , JW is different from NOT ACTIVE, you should be replacing that to Constantinus NA not JW get the difference now?, better yet just constantinus would be quite just fine, anyway I am not here to lecture you on that.

Before Tick 1055 BYZ attacked AoE sub, I tried to avoid further conflict by messaging leaders who are involved to prevent further escalation (not to mention Tman is attacking AoE sailbattles op at the same time)

proof:

http://prntscr.com/23jkzf

http://prntscr.com/23jn3h

and guess what constantinus they REPLIED BACK in a positive way (and you dont , not a single reply)

http://prntscr.com/23job7

http://prntscr.com/23jswm

but still BYZ did not stop attacking they did not say "we ceasefire to settle things up" not a word

clearly AoE has no sign of bad intentions against BYZ,
--------------------------------------
I quote you:

“But NO,it didnt happened simply because Strategy and Nobody couldnt shut up and stop insulting all BYZ members(As one of them keep doing here and thinks we will waste time to respond to his BS..lol).All this while they kept attacking our network in Africa and Aussie.In that point I guess it was way to late to go back.”

if your insulted that you guys are backstabber then you really are a backstabber, and mind you , what was broadcast that time was not an insult, broadcast at that time are purely about BYZ backstabbing AoE, if you guys get insulted by that mere fact, so be it, but don’t make it as an excuse that the broadcast was an insult thereby giving yourself an excuse to backstab us, your pathetic. What a lame excuse. Yes don’t waste your time to respond to my message by making my message as a reference, you’re not consistent .

you had all the time to make an intelligent reply to my message but you kept your silence. The challenge is still on, supply a printscreen of your reply to me regarding avoiding the war or any reply to me, if you can supply me then AoE is the backstabber no question ask no more argument. But if you cant, you should stop yapping cause I will not stop if you keep on bending the truth. BOOM! Finally you came out of your cave.

I will clarify this to all who reads this:
1. AoE lost the battle against BYZ
2. AoE did not intentionally attacked BYZ with the intent to wage war
3. AoE member and allied tried to work the difference by sending message
4. BYZ leaders ignores the mediation
5. BYZ backstab AoE by purposely sending a flower attack (you should know this because you led the attack)
6. I presented printscreen and proof

I quote you again

There is an old say in BD and life:
"Sometimes you win and sometimes you learn"


Where the hell did you get that? you truly are misleading the readers here, I am new here, English is not my primary language and I believe I have not read that saying from BD, in real life maybe but in BD ? I doubt . you’re an old player here but your ignorant , you just made up those words and claimed that BD has a saying like that. You are clearly lying big time. Pls supply me print screen that BD has a saying like that? Even the forum has not mention anything like it before you posted that. The closest thing in real life for that to be saying is “sometimes you win some , sometimes you lose some”… close enough . but not on BD . if you supplied me with prinstcreen of that saying is an old saying of BD I will shut my mouth, but if you dont, or should i say you cant, then try not to talk if your supplying us with lies. BOOM!! shirorororrororoh!!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:15 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 4:07 am
Posts: 71
rendecute wrote:
@djigite

Since you mentioned me in your message to byeheart I will but in,

I don’t know about the theory of rank 3rd your talking about , I never mentioned anything about it so I assume this is for byeheart to anwer you,

I assume you’re the ever powerful constantinus since only dr bones and constantinus have the JW in their name, JW stands for just watching , it’s a misnomer, if your playing BD and you claimed to be JW then don’t do anything , JW is different from NOT ACTIVE, you should be replacing that to Constantinus NA not JW get the difference now?, better yet just constantinus would be quite just fine, anyway I am not here to lecture you on that.

Before Tick 1055 BYZ attacked AoE sub, I tried to avoid further conflict by messaging leaders who are involved to prevent further escalation (not to mention Tman is attacking AoE sailbattles op at the same time)

proof:

http://prntscr.com/23jkzf

http://prntscr.com/23jn3h

and guess what constantinus they REPLIED BACK in a positive way (and you dont , not a single reply)

http://prntscr.com/23job7

http://prntscr.com/23jswm

but still BYZ did not stop attacking they did not say "we ceasefire to settle things up" not a word

clearly AoE has no sign of bad intentions against BYZ,
--------------------------------------
I quote you:

“But NO,it didnt happened simply because Strategy and Nobody couldnt shut up and stop insulting all BYZ members(As one of them keep doing here and thinks we will waste time to respond to his BS..lol).All this while they kept attacking our network in Africa and Aussie.In that point I guess it was way to late to go back.”

if your insulted that you guys are backstabber then you really are a backstabber, and mind you , what was broadcast that time was not an insult, broadcast at that time are purely about BYZ backstabbing AoE, if you guys get insulted by that mere fact, so be it, but don’t make it as an excuse that the broadcast was an insult thereby giving yourself an excuse to backstab us, your pathetic. What a lame excuse. Yes don’t waste your time to respond to my message by making my message as a reference, you’re not consistent .

you had all the time to make an intelligent reply to my message but you kept your silence. The challenge is still on, supply a printscreen of your reply to me regarding avoiding the war or any reply to me, if you can supply me then AoE is the backstabber no question ask no more argument. But if you cant, you should stop yapping cause I will not stop if you keep on bending the truth. BOOM! Finally you came out of your cave.

I will clarify this to all who reads this:
1. AoE lost the battle against BYZ
2. AoE did not intentionally attacked BYZ with the intent to wage war
3. AoE member and allied tried to work the difference by sending message
4. BYZ leaders ignores the mediation
5. BYZ backstab AoE by purposely sending a flower attack (you should know this because you led the attack)
6. I presented printscreen and proof

I quote you again

There is an old say in BD and life:
"Sometimes you win and sometimes you learn"


Where the hell did you get that? you truly are misleading the readers here, I am new here, English is not my primary language and I believe I have not read that saying from BD, in real life maybe but in BD ? I doubt . you’re an old player here but your ignorant , you just made up those words and claimed that BD has a saying like that. You are clearly lying big time. Pls supply me print screen that BD has a saying like that? Even the forum has not mention anything like it before you posted that. The closest thing in real life for that to be saying is “sometimes you win some , sometimes you lose some”… close enough . but not on BD . if you supplied me with prinstcreen of that saying is an old saying of BD I will shut my mouth, but if you dont, or should i say you cant, then try not to talk if your supplying us with lies. BOOM!! shirorororrororoh!!


Not Good at all BYZ NOT Good at ALL

_________________
-Byeheart

Navy, ICE, NG, SOLD, HF, ZOMB


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:44 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:36 am
Posts: 115
Gender: male
*Yawn* can someone wake me up when this is over?

_________________
-Alliances-
OC: NOM, XXX, NACO, BYZ, nWo, aRaB
NC: AcO, DC, WHO, CBoP, BYZ


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: BYZ Vs. AOE
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:50 am 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3362
Gender: male
<3 Battledrama :lol:

_________________
Image


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl