Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

Tom · **Posted:** Tue May 21, 2013 5:55 am

RupertAngier wrote:

Byz=cbop on steroids

I think the implication that the CBop roster could be somehow improved is awry. CBop are beasts.

RupertAngier · **Joined:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:27 pm **Posts:** 1287

Ehhh well I guess i said it but you agreed with it haha

lkl97 · **Joined:** Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:44 am **Posts:** 227

Harvester wrote:

Hanni, it was not an imposter alliance as you were MIA and I was the only member of the OC BYZ that was still kicking around. You had no problem with BYZ being there when I told you what was going on and you built.

Just to clarify: UN was terrible, and by NO MEANS deserved to win that era. The true winner of that era is LION. Hell, it was LION that conquered BYZ, not UN. All UN did was lose armies, hide, boost, and let us suicide into them when we realized we couldn't fight LION unless it was just them.

Spoiler:

But all of that old stuff put to the side, BYZ is going to flourish this round, and I dare anybody to come onto this server and try to stop it.

We have a sore loser over here. A loss is a loss :3

RupertAngier · **Joined:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:27 pm **Posts:** 1287

I know right crying on the forums even if it's true is low class..

Tom · **Posted:** Tue May 21, 2013 3:59 pm

Seems reasonable to found an alliance then make the case that an alliance with the same name but which you are not leading is not truly the same alliance it was/is when you are leading it, no?

If somebody makes an alliance called Sky and loses an era, it doesn't mean that MY Sky has been defeated, does it?

lifenstuff · **Posted:** Tue May 21, 2013 4:01 pm

Tom wrote:

Seems reasonable to found an alliance then make the case that an alliance with the same name but which you are not leading is not truly the same alliance it was/is when you are leading it, no?

If somebody makes an alliance called Sky and loses an era, it doesn't mean that MY Sky has been defeated, does it?

Exactly

the two above are being bad trolls.

sheepdog5 · **Joined:** Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:27 am **Posts:** 257

Mmhmm, I was fine with you leading BYZ and having it, but yes like Tom said, it doesn't mean that it was MY BYZ.

But aye, I shouldn't have used the word "impostor". Another term might have been more fair that would go along with the "its not my byz, that was yours"

Anyways, I look forward to this round, I have heard quite a few excellent, respected, and skilled players are planning on playing in a few different alliances and going for the win. This is VERY exciting, I look forward to an incredibly competitive round (hopefully!)

RupertAngier · **Joined:** Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:27 pm **Posts:** 1287

If you're referring to me.. I was referring to harvesters comments that un sucked... And they didn't deserve the win..and was just pointing how incredibly lame that was...

Harvester · **Posted:** Wed May 22, 2013 1:13 am

RupertAngier wrote:

I know right crying on the forums even if it's true is low class..

RupertAngier wrote:

If you're referring to me.. I was referring to harvesters comments that un sucked... And they didn't deserve the win..and was just pointing how incredibly lame that was...

I didn't write that post to slam UN or anything, simply to state that they couldn't have won without LION's help. Notice how the Tribune only had one side of the story, it was always going to be a little biased towards UN. I simply told my side of what happened, although I do admit I could've been less harsh on them. Hell, I'm also probably a little biased but that doesn't take away the validity of what I said (besides the insults).

Normally I wouldn't even waste my time responding to your post, but I only posted about UN on the forums a singular time. Now I don't know about you, I wouldn't exactly call that QQing.

thechessshark13 · **Joined:** Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:02 pm **Posts:** 595

I wonder if this'll turn into another CE era

Next Era: The Byzantine Empire Returns