Author |
Message |
Unkn0wN
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:20 pm |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:38 pm Posts: 460 Gender: male
|
Just build armor and own the world .
Unky
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
riski1234567dr
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:21 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:58 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
Unkn0wN wrote: Just build armor and own the world .
Unky I thought it was damage only!
|
|
Top |
|
Unkn0wN
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:24 pm |
|
First Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:38 pm Posts: 460 Gender: male
|
Thats why you didnt beat me cheers Unky
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
immortalisllc
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 1:21 am |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 10:22 pm Posts: 68
|
henry700 wrote: And it looks like you are writing your notes from the great beyond. lol
|
|
Top |
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:02 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am Posts: 7996 Location: Fuyuki City Gender: male
|
glenn11021991 wrote: non cooncussive armor is fine if you're playing solo
people just made armors concussive so that they have more survivability if their other teammates use beam/explosive armor exactly lol, the concussive armor is a way to fair out the loss. It won't affect the outcomes of the match (except u're saying the armor will survive till round 3 and do damage)...
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
henry700
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 3:35 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:24 pm Posts: 102 Location: Not my site, but awesome. Gender: male
|
So if people only do concussive because of that, i'd say its screwing with your teammates, and missing the bonus if you mix chassis.
Plus dude immort really, the jokes are getting old now. metaphorical stuff like that makes you look like an idiot while you talk, and im not the only one that thinks that. make stuff more simple without giving examples and trying to humiliate people like that. At first it was OK but now it has become lame already.
_________________ Umad?
|
|
Top |
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 3:47 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am Posts: 7996 Location: Fuyuki City Gender: male
|
no it's giving u as well as all ur teammate a fair chance of losing units. Those armor units will not survive till tick 3 to actually dealing damages.
It's like... "Hey we'll lose around the same number of troops. That's cool to me." instead of "Yo I have less explosive armor so u'll probably die more than me" (since explosive die first, then beam then to concussive, unless the xp comes to play).
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
henry700
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 5:49 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:24 pm Posts: 102 Location: Not my site, but awesome. Gender: male
|
Oh. i thought it was to minimalize casualties and channel the damage to the teammates who don't do concussive.
Well, with equal ratios it would work the same...if people are fair inside an alliance.
_________________ Umad?
|
|
Top |
|
warhero1000
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:17 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:09 pm Posts: 148 Location: east coast of the united states Gender: male
|
aister wrote: true. if u have enough troops, even when u build pure armor u still win.
but then, how much will u lost? Pure armor, compare to armor / damage / range, compare to 2 range 1 armor ratio. Just run a simulation and see for urself.
Damage units, imo, is less effective in terms of defense than armor units since they have less HP and higher cost, and less effective in terms of offense than range since they have to get to round 4 to actually dealing more damage than range units. And I don't think damage units will survive till round 4. JUST saying guys. but if you run one chasis versus the same chasis with the same amount of troops. one with armour, damage, and range Vs. armour, and range. the one with damage comes out on top. i've ran this with all chassis' and same thing. i promise you i've built like that for several eras and the only ones i lose are to people with bigger armies. JS ik im late haha
_________________ Best Personal Rank: 8 Best Alliance Rank: 2 Most Crystals: 28 Most Power: 147 In Game Names: Gravity Alliances: PRRR F4 finished 2nd. AVA E4 finished 2nd
|
|
Top |
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: You're building it wrong Posted: Sat May 05, 2012 3:46 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am Posts: 7996 Location: Fuyuki City Gender: male
|
warhero1000 wrote: aister wrote: true. if u have enough troops, even when u build pure armor u still win.
but then, how much will u lost? Pure armor, compare to armor / damage / range, compare to 2 range 1 armor ratio. Just run a simulation and see for urself.
Damage units, imo, is less effective in terms of defense than armor units since they have less HP and higher cost, and less effective in terms of offense than range since they have to get to round 4 to actually dealing more damage than range units. And I don't think damage units will survive till round 4. JUST saying guys. but if you run one chasis versus the same chasis with the same amount of troops. one with armour, damage, and range Vs. armour, and range. the one with damage comes out on top. i've ran this with all chassis' and same thing. i promise you i've built like that for several eras and the only ones i lose are to people with bigger armies. JS ik im late hahaand sr if I'm being harsh, but it's stupid to attack someone with the same amount of units. Watever u do, try to outnumber ur enemy. That's one of the most important principles of war.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|