It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:42 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
 Profile

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 10
Wow. Just wow. ML is absolutely winning, yet they use backstabb to get rid of my army. Frankly, I dont see the need. Or maybe Im a lil too dangerous? 0_o Oh well... bottom line: ML backstabbs M. Many say Kane is a huge backstabber... what they didnt say is that he'd do such a dumb backstabb when hes completely dominating the entire world. Ya know what they say, what goes around comes around ;)

Vault Dweller, M alliance


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:57 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:27 am
Posts: 505
Location: MA, US
Gender: male
I can attest that in no way we're backstabbing anybody, especially M. There was a territorial aggreement between the both of us. M has violated that agreement by being in parts of Africa where they should not be. We are enforcing that agreement. I highly wouldn't consider that to be any form of backstabbing.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:30 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1275
Vault, you were one of the newer recruits into M and LOZ fell, which means you weren't in the loop for the agreements that were currently placed between M and ML.

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:27 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:18 pm
Posts: 349
Location: Behind you!
Gender: male
lunatic359 wrote:
I can attest that in no way we're backstabbing anybody, especially M. There was a territorial aggreement between the both of us. M has violated that agreement by being in parts of Africa where they should not be. We are enforcing that agreement. I highly wouldn't consider that to be any form of backstabbing.



Lunatic, I had relocated from Africa. I builded there originally, and after joining M I relocated. I was merely moving my army away from my former hive, outside of Africa.

AnitsuEx wrote:
Vault, you were one of the newer recruits into M and LOZ fell, which means you weren't in the loop for the agreements that were currently placed between M and ML.


Anitsu, yes I did join after these deals were made. But they were made with the ML flag and the M flag. And when a member joins an alliance, he/she must abide by the rules, friendships, deals, territories and orders existing on that alliance. And other alliances must respect I am a new member of such alliance. You knew you were targeting an M member, not just Vault Dweller.


These arguments are really pathetic, dont even try to hide your intentions or actions. You know what you did was a backstabb, and its really shameful you try to change the facts. Fine, you took out 10~squads. Even if it wasnt a war, just peace. And you had to backstabb to do it. Really, what a shame of an alliance. But at least, show some pride and accept what you did... even if its a low backstabb by an alliance that could take any other out head-on, fair an square ;)

_________________
Image

The New Brotherhood of Steel... brothers till death rip us apart


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:52 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1275
It's not my intentions nor what I did, because I'm not in ML :twisted:

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:56 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
 Profile

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 10
And who said I was speaking 2 you? I posted replies 4 2 ppl ;)


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:29 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:20 pm
Posts: 1275
Because I referred to the reply that you put that was under my quote; I'd assumed it was directed at me.

_________________
【Wins】 - 【12】
【Earth】【RoL】【RoL】【SoTF】【DoP】
【Mars】 【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【FMJ】【COPS】【DRAW】
【Fantasy】【EB】【Wolf】


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:01 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:55 am
Posts: 186
Gender: male
i see "supposedly" 1 person behind 2 names? who is the dweller of u guys then? Caesarlegion refering that he replied to 2 persons which is writen under a diff. acc name. Dude why are u talking out of 2 accounts?

_________________
I am a SoLDier


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:25 pm 
Major
Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:10 pm
Posts: 2761
Location: USA
Gender: male
lunatic359 wrote:
I can attest that in no way we're backstabbing anybody, especially M. There was a territorial aggreement between the both of us. M has violated that agreement by being in parts of Africa where they should not be. We are enforcing that agreement. I highly wouldn't consider that to be any form of backstabbing.


alright if u are really so stupid that u cant understand what vault said i will spell it out so even u can understand
vault started in africa with LOZ

LOZ died so later he joined M

after he relocated he was trying to bring his army home

ML attacks outposts vault was moving to

vault had to turn back

ML attacked his army and killed it

now for the more intelligant people basicly what ML did was trap vaults army in Africa thinking none of us would notice that and used the excuse of him being in africa to attack us as a violation of the agreement but technicaly what happend here was that they had attacked vaults op 1st when he was trying to get out of africa so no matter how u look at it ML violated the agreement no matter how u look at it as long as u know the facts about what actualy happend

_________________
MGH 1st
MGH 1st
WWs 1st
XIRX 4th
TTE 1st
RFW 2nd
Hero 2nd
Image
3rd E5 SOLO
FPM 1st
TFF 2nd
ToXc 1st
add me on supermechs 8069321


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ML going low
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:27 pm 
Major
Major
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:38 am
Posts: 2968
Location: Broome, Western Australia
Gender: male
From what I can see, Vault or somebody in M should have notified ML.. M, you DID break the pact but you >>ASSUMED<< ML would notice that Vault was just moving his army up. I have seen MANY alliances fall over this because they 'ASSUME' a NAP means the pact partner cannot move into their hive and because they 'ASSUME' they can move their armies out of forbidden territory without notifying the pact partners. M, it's your fault for assuming ML knows that Vault had a legit reason to be in Africa >.>

Now don't complain, don't troll the forum, learn from it and never take anything for granted again. M were following orders and don't forget YOU M had giving them permission to engage squads in Africa, as I said, it's all your fault ^_^

_________________
Retired Head Mod

Image

Most Crystals: 121
Highest Power: 212


Sensual bath time feat. Ferr3t
Spoiler:
Image


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl