It is currently Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:29 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:05 pm
Posts: 707
Gender: male
Jamie1970 wrote:
Random speaks the truth and nothing but the truth

and nap is a peace of *CENSORED* hitler had one with russia and broke it did u see the russian run around shouting backstab no they got up of there ass and kicked some ass now on other terms putting the blame on karl because he is leader is wrong and every1 knows a good leader does not take action on his own its put to a vote

nap to relics came out and i see 5 relics out already

Hero u put up a fight

Sorry but Hitler in no way is equal to TLG or even this game. So this whole post was kind of pointless. I also wish I understood. Obviously someone had the idea to attack us and obviously someone ok'd it. If it is not the leader ok-ing things, then the alliances is not run properly. (Not saying this is the case with Karl, but just making my point)

So you put up a good fight, but this in no way is valid on this game.

_________________
Image
Image
Follow BD on Twitter!
Image
Old Client
ExSo{e7}-#1
OTHG{e6}-#1
TdCt{E4}-#1
New Client
NASA{E3}-#1
KoTu{F1}-#1
CRAP{E1}-#2


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:16 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:16 pm
Posts: 578
Gender: male
Hero wrote:
But ask around a NAP is a non-aggression pact, attacking is aggression therefore the NAP was broke.



Finally the correct way to say this situation. *Applauds* :) I don't mean to come at you like I'm attacking you cause I don't mean for you to take it that way. Also I don't know what is going on so therefore I'm not speaking for any alliance. I'm just speaking on the truths of Backstabbing.

_________________
Leader of 1st place "oVo" on F5
MES-2nd
E1 victories:
HaHa/HeHe
RuN

Image
Respect Few Fear None


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:37 am 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:47 pm
Posts: 11
your saying the leader does as hewants maybe in F but in TLG we all agree on things here we dont jump into things at let one rule yes Karl is the leader and one of the best leaders i played under since the old client

as i said good fight it was not backstab what was done was done fair and your leader knows the truth but if you all listen to him well we know who the boss is there


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:14 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 1680
Location: in my happy place
Gender: male
F deserve to die...go TLG!!! :D

_________________
Image
thx Andy for the sig

MOST CRYSTALS: 142
BEST POWER: 261

BD:
Image

BG:

Image

free tokens!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:02 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:04 pm
Posts: 287
Random wrote:
Lol Calling me a coward because I said I would go for the win against a weaker alliance?? I'm pretty sure that makes me smart. A just a simple We are allied til the relics come out isn't a strong NAP. Eventually we are going to get bored just waiting around.

i agree with Random, why it's called a strategy game if you can't be smart? It's an internet game, i can just make a new colony name next era and have the thing called "honor" again :lol:

_________________
Image
ARM-DETH-AL-WWs-SoTF-LIS
IGN:Chloie, Bonus, McDobol, Sonic, BumbleV, Ino of Inquisition
Highest power: 314
Highest Crystals: 93
Highest Rank: 1


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:12 pm 
Major
Major
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am
Posts: 3027
Location: Look outside of the window, look to the tree... See the figure? That's not me.
Gender: male
socialmisfit1 wrote:
F deserve to die...go TLG!!! :D


You will never win an era. :D


gino948 wrote:
Random wrote:
Lol Calling me a coward because I said I would go for the win against a weaker alliance?? I'm pretty sure that makes me smart. A just a simple We are allied til the relics come out isn't a strong NAP. Eventually we are going to get bored just waiting around.

i agree with Random, why it's called a strategy game if you can't be smart? It's an internet game, i can just make a new colony name next era and have the thing called "honor" again :lol:


Because everyone invests time and money in game - you grow bonds and make promises. Your reputation is all you keep, at the end of the era the crystals, power, all goes to dust. The reputation you hold - the way people remember you - lasts and can aid or harm you other era's.


Random, random, random. I used to have so much respect for you, you were nice and loyal. What happened to you? Power got to your head bro?

_________________
Best Regards,

Alexander V


Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:59 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 3:53 pm
Posts: 513
Gender: male
Less of a NAP and more of an MDP, we actually held 2 pacts.

1 pact was a MDP against L. If one alliance moved against L, the other was also at war against L, and if L declared on one, the other had to declare on L.

The 2nd pact was as such, whether you call it a NAP or MDP, or alliance, idk.

The terms were:

1. This pact will end whenever all 10 relics are in possession of both parties.

2. This pact by no means explains what happens after 10 relics are in possession, that is to be discussed later

3. Both alliance may not attack each other during this pact.

4. Both alliances are not bound to protection but encouraged to do so

5. Both alliances will set their own boundaries of their territory as the game develops and as deemed fair by both leaders.



Yes, it's a backstab.

Yes, it happens in BD

Yes, I reserve the right to be a little ticked off by the matter, but in the end it is a game and I hold no grudge besides the fact that I will be least likely to trust the players in TLG, and least likely to play with any of them.

Random, you don't play this era seriously and yet you talk seriously about it. Go do something more productive with your hands and mouth and give some girl much needed loving.

Tier, I make my comments to Karl directly because he is responsible for what the alliance does...no matter what. That falls straight on the leader's shoulders and no one elses. That orange flag signifies the entire responsibility of the alliance, and the head of that alliance.

Therefore, if you have a leader you do not wish to follow orders from, you will tarnish his reputation. If a leader makes an order that you're against, but go with it anyways, you will tarnish your own reputation as well as him tarnishing his own.

I will go sleep now.

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:36 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 1680
Location: in my happy place
Gender: male
Lolowut wrote:
Less of a NAP and more of an MDP, we actually held 2 pacts.

1 pact was a MDP against L. If one alliance moved against L, the other was also at war against L, and if L declared on one, the other had to declare on L.

The 2nd pact was as such, whether you call it a NAP or MDP, or alliance, idk.

The terms were:

1. This pact will end whenever all 10 relics are in possession of both parties.

2. This pact by no means explains what happens after 10 relics are in possession, that is to be discussed later

3. Both alliance may not attack each other during this pact.

4. Both alliances are not bound to protection but encouraged to do so

5. Both alliances will set their own boundaries of their territory as the game develops and as deemed fair by both leaders.



Yes, it's a backstab.

Yes, it happens in BD

Yes, I reserve the right to be a little ticked off by the matter, but in the end it is a game and I hold no grudge besides the fact that I will be least likely to trust the players in TLG, and least likely to play with any of them.

Random, you don't play this era seriously and yet you talk seriously about it. Go do something more productive with your hands and mouth and give some girl much needed loving.

Tier, I make my comments to Karl directly because he is responsible for what the alliance does...no matter what. That falls straight on the leader's shoulders and no one elses. That orange flag signifies the entire responsibility of the alliance, and the head of that alliance.

Therefore, if you have a leader you do not wish to follow orders from, you will tarnish his reputation. If a leader makes an order that you're against, but go with it anyways, you will tarnish your own reputation as well as him tarnishing his own.

I will go sleep now.

he got you good Proffesor F:P go on admit it! they probibly were tricking you with the NAP

_________________
Image
thx Andy for the sig

MOST CRYSTALS: 142
BEST POWER: 261

BD:
Image

BG:

Image

free tokens!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:40 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 1680
Location: in my happy place
Gender: male
Alexanderkitty wrote:
socialmisfit1 wrote:
F deserve to die...go TLG!!! :D


You will never win an era. :D

PPC are the greatest aliance in e3 only ones to have ended on the top 3 every era since creation go PPC :D die F :twisted:

_________________
Image
thx Andy for the sig

MOST CRYSTALS: 142
BEST POWER: 261

BD:
Image

BG:

Image

free tokens!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: TLG moved against F
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:14 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 3:53 pm
Posts: 513
Gender: male
I could get Rank 3 as an alliance by recruiting a bunch of newbs from the server and not donating, but last time I did that I got rank 1 as an alliance..

_________________
Image


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl