It is currently Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:41 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:14 pm
Posts: 92
Location: Alberta, Canada
edwin737 wrote:
SniperMissile wrote:

Who else wants to join in? Or do you people want another #1 alliance dominating the game from start until finish. AP succeeded because we let them.


.

Your an idiot noob you didnt let us win we were always one step ahead of you noobs


Edwina, are you mad because you're ugly, or because nobody loves you?

@Hyperion

I don't know who you are in the game, but I get it if you are the type of person who would just let someone (Even the Rank 1 Alliance) get away with breaking an agreement. Twice.

Diplomunion on the other hand, we aren't like that. We're stand up type of people. Join in.

_________________
Onward, Diplomunion! We salute you!
Steamy Waffles? Click!
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:51 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:04 am
Posts: 284
SniperMissile wrote:
edwin737 wrote:
SniperMissile wrote:

Who else wants to join in? Or do you people want another #1 alliance dominating the game from start until finish. AP succeeded because we let them.


.

Your an idiot noob you didnt let us win we were always one step ahead of you noobs


Edwina, are you mad because you're ugly, or because nobody loves you?

@Hyperion

I don't know who you are in the game, but I get it if you are the type of person who would just let someone (Even the Rank 1 Alliance) get away with breaking an agreement. Twice.

Diplomunion on the other hand, we aren't like that. We're stand up type of people. Join in.


From our stand point you guys broke the nap first and between the two I'd rather trust our parent alliance.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:58 am 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:06 am
Posts: 23
From your standpoint?

Lona
Agree to nap ---> attack resource mines and colony

And we broke the nap...? lol wat


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:59 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:14 pm
Posts: 92
Location: Alberta, Canada
We'll, I'll give you the proper lay down of what happened.

Around Stab's army, there was 3-4 colonies that had crystals on them, DIPE got the the crystals before stab.

Later that day, a neutral took an Iona metal mine, we took it from the neutral at the same time that Stab was attacking it.

Stab, mad at his crystal loss and that we we're getting the majority of the mines in North Africa from neutrals decided he would use the attack on the Iona metal mine (Which was clearly a mistake) to declare total war on us.

He sent me personally messages, telling me to boot my member and conquer him, or else the NAP was off.

So we didn't, after that I tried to calm both sides down, and Iona agreed to a ceasefire. However, I guess it didn't reach the common member, because Iona continued to attack us and take our mines, while sailing their relic right past us.

And, well, here we are now.

_________________
Onward, Diplomunion! We salute you!
Steamy Waffles? Click!
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:59 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:04 am
Posts: 284
From what I've been told Maanco attacked first so its your word verses theirs.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:15 am 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:50 pm
Posts: 125
Gender: male
you have yet to produce the screen shoot you says tells the story of my lie . could that be because i speak the truth? your man took my gate as we started our march vs DOM , it was not part of any deal that you could take it. the mine was green , as your member took it , i sent a spam later to recapture. i waited and watched to see what else you would do , and when it looked like you went afk i pounced on the large army next to my colony.So you can take your one sided NAP and shove it where the sun don`t shine.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:56 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:25 pm
Posts: 2535
NCR will war RIP with TU and NuTu will they die. RIP and subs WILL go down.

Image

Thats most of his army. Pretty pathetic build I say

_________________
Socialite. Has-been.

No matter how long I have been gone, my heart will lead me back here.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:30 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:55 am
Posts: 1163
Guys. We didn't break a NAP or ceasefire. Because we aren't stupid. We had a relic passing you guys. That was the whole reason for the ceasefire. Do you really think we would abandon the ceasefire and attack you guys with a relic going past you, with offline armies stationed on it? No, we wouldn't. You guys took advantage of the fact that we had a ceasefire, and that it's easy to act like the victim of dishonour against the rank 1 alliance.

At the end of the day. We gave you endless agreements and NAPs etc while you were in africa. We didn't need to. We didn't need to let you take resource ops in our continent. But we did. And you kept trying you luck.

Also, I'm in your skype groups. Plotting against myself.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:17 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 10:20 am
Posts: 46
Diazepam wrote:
Guys. We didn't break a NAP or ceasefire. Because we aren't stupid. We had a relic passing you guys. That was the whole reason for the ceasefire. Do you really think we would abandon the ceasefire and attack you guys with a relic going past you, with offline armies stationed on it? No, we wouldn't. You guys took advantage of the fact that we had a ceasefire, and that it's easy to act like the victim of dishonour against the rank 1 alliance.

At the end of the day. We gave you endless agreements and NAPs etc while you were in africa. We didn't need to. We didn't need to let you take resource ops in our continent. But we did. And you kept trying you luck.

Also, I'm in your skype groups. Plotting against myself.


rajz continued to take our ops. Eventually you realize that ur talk falls on deaf ears and you have to take action. So we took action. Me and two other members in what was the worst planned assault on a relic ever attempted attacked the relic and seized it from you. It was a last minute plan because we never intended to take it. Not because we want the relic, but because your members never took us seriously.

You didn't have to do many things. You didnt have to give us an NAP or a fake ceasefire. But your members also didnt have to treat us like some second tier alliance that didnt deserve to exist. They didnt have to act like such war mongerers. They didnt have to act like they didnt know what a ceasefire was.

Besides, The resource intake from this relic makes up for all the resource ops you stole from us. And if you even attempt to come to south america we'll simply hand the relic to NCR. Our goal isn't to win anymore, its to watch iona's world burn.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:29 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:55 am
Posts: 1163
From what I had seen. During our NAP, there was a small misunderstanding over a resource OP. Which resulted in 5 nukes being fired at us from your alliance. We gave you the ceasefire you requested, then you used that time to organise a relocation and take our relic. I'm just calling it like I see it. And like I said, it's very easy to act like the victim against the big bad rank 1 alliance.

There is no war here. Only one alliance trying to grab what they can, while running away on their high horse trying to convince themselves that they aren't on the dishonourable side of such a move. If there was a war, we would have been attacking you. But we weren't and aren't. Which makes this kind of funny.


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl