Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

wolfballs · **Joined:** Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:06 am **Posts:** 23

dylsupreme1 wrote:

I hope you realize you won't last long. :roll:

Clearly, as demonstrated by the BR.

dylsupreme1 · **Posted:** Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:34 am

It's a game, and your not speaking in literal terms.

Oh no, it's finally happening. I'm turning into a........ duo troll. :shock:

wolfballs · **Joined:** Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:06 am **Posts:** 23

Oh literal terms

Like Lona just literally lost a relic, and literally lost 602 units (to a less soldier amount and metal amount army). I'm not smacking, I'm just stating what happened.

Because they didn't honor a ceasefire or a nap,

trololol?

Belisarius09 · **Joined:** Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:54 pm **Posts:** 32

Hyperion101 · **Joined:** Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:04 am **Posts:** 284

wolfballs wrote:

Oh literal terms

Like Lona just literally lost a relic, and literally lost 602 units (to a less soldier amount and metal amount army). I'm not smacking, I'm just stating what happened.

Because they didn't honor a ceasefire or a nap,

trololol?

And now you're about to die with 100's of your tanks stuck on a relic. Problem?

edwin737 · **Posted:** Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:08 am

SniperMissile wrote:

Who else wants to join in? Or do you people want another #1 alliance dominating the game from start until finish. AP succeeded because we let them.

.

Your an idiot noob you didnt let us win we were always one step ahead of you noobs

Belisarius09 · **Joined:** Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:54 pm **Posts:** 32

edwin737 wrote:

SniperMissile wrote:

Who else wants to join in? Or do you people want another #1 alliance dominating the game from start until finish. AP succeeded because we let them.

.

Your an idiot noob you didnt let us win we were always one step ahead of you noobs

U MAD bro?

wolfballs · **Joined:** Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:06 am **Posts:** 23

edwin737 wrote:

SniperMissile wrote:

Who else wants to join in? Or do you people want another #1 alliance dominating the game from start until finish. AP succeeded because we let them.

.

Your an idiot noob you didnt let us win we were always one step ahead of you noobs

*You're

Hyperion101 wrote:

And now you're about to die with 100's of your tanks stuck on a relic. Problem?

How many ticks are left in the round? What's more important to have, freedom for 72 ticks, or 100's of tanks.

How much in $ value did we destroy?

Hyperion101 · **Joined:** Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:04 am **Posts:** 284

Hyperion101 wrote:

And now you're about to die with 100's of your tanks stuck on a relic. Problem?

How many ticks are left in the round? What's more important to have, freedom for 72 ticks, or 100's of tanks.

How much in $ value did we destroy?[/quote]

I'm guess about as much as their alliance boosts in a day XD XD XD

on second thought probably not even.

delay them? they'll just take it back and things will move along and the round will end when it ends. Do you really think you can delay them more than say tdg can? You don't even have as much power as their sub and even with a relic you can't make it onto the first page.

Tl;dr: not very much damage

wolfballs · **Joined:** Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:06 am **Posts:** 23

Who made claims that we could delay them more than TDG could? Look at their power, its very comparable to TDG's right now. It isn't leaps and bounds ahead of the rest of the top alliances.

Scan where the relic is right now and the west coast of africa, and you'll get a better picture of how things are going.

This isn't even about doing damage to Lona, but we got very tired of the lack of respect. If they had just said, nope we're going to war that's it. Then no big deal that is fine. Instead they agreed to ceasefire, didn't honor, agreed to NAP, didn't honor.

If they aren't going to honor any peace agreements, might as well see what we can do about those armies.

RIP, RIPs vs NnTu, TU, lona