It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2014 1:33 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:51 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 WWW  YIM  Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm
Posts: 739
Location: fantasy
Gender: male
Iron needed to work on there invading tactics :D

_________________
-AP- GS
FMJ oVo
GS BFPT
HAHA
Image
Image


Skype name edwin7744 :D


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:10 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:47 pm
Posts: 42
Gender: male
jaepezmars wrote:

It was proved that IRON has weak ministers


not really

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:09 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:30 am
Posts: 54
Gender: female
Conclusion:

Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? :D :D


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:59 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 79
jaepezmars wrote:
The simple matter of it is CE and NAM have got their plans down. (well NAM does, CE just follows orders, no real strategy in that except basic survival) They are a cohesive FORCE. They move when they are supposed to and divide up the battles.

All the other alliances against them have yet to work together on a great plan. There was a direct split in IRON's allies that let NAM and CE concentrate everything on taking down IRON and are now on their way to finish off the AA sector. IRON failed in keeping peace between those who would help and now NEW WORLD ORDERS will have to be formed to keep NAM or CE from winning as soon as relics come out.

It was proved that IRON has weak ministers and NAM found the right lackeys.

YOu can boost all you want but your not gunna stop 5 good alliances (one or two of whom will be pure sacrifice) who can COORDINATE. Seen it plenty of times in MARS and FANTASY but not in the EARTH realms so much...weird.

BTW to my enemies, i keep my immaturity to the BC and private messages not here on the forum.


I would like to note that the only time CE units clashed with Iron units was tick 359 on Europe in a total loss for CE and Nam. (Iron left Europe the next tick). At this time 2 of the three members of CE that were involved in that suicide mission are now in Nam.

As certain people have said on skype thanks for letting it be a one on one. No matter what BC said that is really what it was. Sure Nam killed a few of Irons subs armies before the big battle but that was by choice not because the sub attacked.

Sure our allies clashed with each other but really the only attacks on Nam or Iron were done by the other.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:13 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
Chivas0611 wrote:
Conclusion:

Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? :D :D


and yet again another Nam player is an ass, though I will not judge the rest for these two incompetent fools who delight themselves in insulting the enemy even after the war.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:51 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:50 pm
Posts: 28
Gender: male
jaepezmars wrote:
All the other alliances against them have yet to work together on a great plan...now NEW WORLD ORDERS will have to be formed to keep NAM or CE from winning as soon as relics come out.

I'm sure Nam and CE have loyal allies and they aren't going to have to worry about anything like that, haha.

The remaining allies of IRON are below the top 5, so the fact is there. The top 4 are Nam, CE, and allies.

This "New World Order" can't happen if the forces contributing to it aren't strong enough to make a difference.

_________________
Nrod-Rodriguez-Nickster64
Image
credz Maxattack for sig


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:15 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 7:46 pm
Posts: 72
Gender: male
SGTKIM, leader of the " United Ellite Forces " is Here. This is my first time using the Forum. =)

It would be Nice If you send me some great Tips how to post battle reports and other fun pictures.

Anyways, CONGRATS! to Nam. You guys Killed IRON Faster Than I thought. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And CE, Will soon destroy Alliances @ Antarctica. :lol: :lol: :lol:

BTW, I am 12, soon turning 13 @ September. :D :D

@ Nam and CE, We are your True ally right ? :?: :?: :mrgreen: 8-) 8-)

Also, @ Booster Haters. Boosters are not CHEATING. Everyone can Boost If they want to. So, Stop hating on boosters. I can't boost since i am too young to have a Card. :cry: :cry: :cry: :( :(


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:36 pm 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:55 am
Posts: 104
Gender: male
Stoned2Assassin wrote:
Chivas0611 wrote:
Conclusion:

Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? :D :D


and yet again another Nam player is an ass, though I will not judge the rest for these two incompetent fools who delight themselves in insulting the enemy even after the war.



i think chiva is right ... oh come on .. we cnqred 3-4 members with only spams ... that is really a shame lol

_________________
Most Crystals: 201
Highest power: 486 @tick200
Winning Alliances
FEAR, Hell, VVV, SoL, MOON,(The Elements), Nam, SWIM, PUFF, AL, nWo, V, DoG
Leader of HaHa #1

Watching worlds
Mars1
Earth2
Mars3


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:13 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
micheal wrote:
Stoned2Assassin wrote:
Chivas0611 wrote:
Conclusion:

Iron have weak army, weak players, weak skills and weak diplomatic strategic? :D :D


and yet again another Nam player is an ass, though I will not judge the rest for these two incompetent fools who delight themselves in insulting the enemy even after the war.



i think chiva is right ... oh come on .. we cnqred 3-4 members with only spams ... that is really a shame lol


lol they quit but either way you guys won and chivas is just being an ass.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:10 pm 
Private
Private
 Profile

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 12:38 am
Posts: 9
Finally got on the scoreboard... took out 80ish of morgans tanks


Can be conquered happy now


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
WarLingo Android Mobile Game

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl