| Author |
Message |
|
TheCallum
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub  Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:50 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
|
kyleEx wrote: wth i dont boost but its all good for me =O im not spending reds on a game ive played 1month. ps im new member lol take it easy  forget who broke NAP,it wont stop the war. You are my new favourite IRON member .
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Stoned2Assassin
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:58 am |
|
| Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
|
|
I have never boosted with any reds yet Have been able to get to rank 20 without ever even dipping into my blues.
in fact there are a lot of players in IRON who do not boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
ttotheoma
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:54 pm |
|
| Sergeant |
 |
|
|
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:08 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Gibbons
Gender: male
|
|
ha gollum i love how you show that you are paying for your way into NAM by giving all there members tokens
_________________
toma
|
|
| Top |
|
|
TheCallum
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:16 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
|
ttotheoma wrote: ha gollum i love how you show that you are paying for your way into NAM by giving all there members tokens He gave us all tokens completely by surprise, and it was a nice gift  . Also I think it's worth noting that this is the first (or second?) time he's boosted this round.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Arifureta
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:06 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 230
|
ttotheoma wrote: ha gollum i love how you show that you are paying for your way into NAM by giving all there members tokens Iam not you hun, i dont recruit based on that  On another news, another IRON "secret" allied just failed their backstabb, have fun in AA
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
kyleEx
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:53 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 9:12 pm
Posts: 3
|
TheCallum wrote: kyleEx wrote: wth i dont boost but its all good for me =O im not spending reds on a game ive played 1month. ps im new member lol take it easy forget who broke NAP,it wont stop the war. You are my new favourite IRON member . Some reds would be nice tho,my b-day is near, aug 08  feel free to send xD
|
|
| Top |
|
|
TheCallum
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:10 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
|
kyleEx wrote: TheCallum wrote: kyleEx wrote: wth i dont boost but its all good for me =O im not spending reds on a game ive played 1month. ps im new member lol take it easy forget who broke NAP,it wont stop the war. You are my new favourite IRON member . Some reds would be nice tho,my b-day is near, aug 08 feel free to send xD Despite the IRON propaganda machine, myself and Nam (probably gollum excluded) currently have no reds to speak of  . It's surprising that we're being called the heavy boosters when it is clear we have a much larger territory than IRON (thus more conquers) yet a lower score.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
pilot14
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:30 pm |
|
| Specialist |
|
|
|
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:36 pm
Posts: 34
|
Hate to break it to you, but we have a higher score because more conquers are obviously in North and South America (two continents) to one team. if we're such heavy boosters, then why does our sub hold the #3 spot? I hope you don't try to say they boost too, because obviously they don't, it's a sub. (Besides Valient of course) Also, we may have boosted ( I personally didn't besides the blues that every other average players use) but it was in the first 50 ticks of the round. Also, regarding the "allies backstabbing" thing I saw earlier in this topic, Nam made themselves look like a bully to the world, so more people rally behind the IRON flag. We're nothing but the generous rulers of Earth 3. If Nam never BACKSTABBED us, then we wouldn't of ever had to come across the ocean to plant our boot up their... - The Iron Curtain
|
|
| Top |
|
|
abhixx
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:38 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:38 pm
Posts: 80
Gender: male
|
Man this forum sure blew up XD Anywhoo we are abt to fight... may the best win... i would really appreciate it if CE and Nam didn't team up against us this time as well fight us one on one Nam or CE enough trash talk here already... i don't normally resort to forums as u can see XD gluck.. looking forward to a good battle
_________________
Legendary Isotox
Winning Alliances - TLA F2, DETH F6, Milk/FPM M2, SoFe M3, HaHa M1, BoS F1
Families Associated with:- TLA, DETH, HaHa, BoS, FPM
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Arifureta
|
Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:50 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 230
|
"Also, regarding the "allies backstabbing" thing I saw earlier in this topic, Nam made themselves look like a bully to the world, so more people rally behind the IRON flag. We're nothing but the generous rulers of Earth 3. If Nam never BACKSTABBED us, then we wouldn't of ever had to come across the ocean to plant our boot up their... " Thats reallly.. Your the backstabbers here not us, and i already gave a list of reasons, learn to read Your sub did boost, maybe not all Valient had a load of power with 5 conquers, wanna explain if they didnt boost? And abhixx, you asked pretty much every alliance for help, why exactly cant we "team up"? Funny
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
