It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2014 10:43 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:51 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:36 pm
Posts: 354
Location: New Zealand
Gender: male
First day of war. Here are some BR's enjoy =] As you can see IRON took the bigger loss :P

Image

Image

_________________
Image
Image
MGH - OS - SPAM - COPS - Nam - TLD - DUMB - KnaW - TTM - SoTF - KOOL - HAHA


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:55 am 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:31 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:57 am
Posts: 33
IRON will win. CE and NAM dont like to have too many allies and therfore everybody else is going to side with IRON and let them WIN.. CONGRATS TO IRON ON WINNING THIS ERA !! At some point CE and NAM will be fighting two fronts from a BOX. RoL was able to fight out of this last ERA because they had a very good PEN, something NAM and CE lack as thier allies will find out and then betray them.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:36 pm 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:24 pm
Posts: 2337
Location: no location for you
Gender: female
you just cant assume there gonna win just because there number 1 who knows maybe some unknown alliance will come out from the darkness and win

_________________
Image
Image
PSN: aLpHaOmEgAXII


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:39 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:47 pm
Posts: 42
Gender: male
Hmm, the Fact that those units are in Asia and only being used for Conquers and Mines. Cool ;)

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:43 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
mmm i place my money on IRON, Nam are pushing everyone else to Iron's camp they have no hope with no allies. :lol: and those are barely scratches on their unit count and your allready celebrating xD


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:45 pm 
Sergeant
Sergeant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:38 pm
Posts: 84
Gender: male
LOL Gollum....
Nice fight i agree but u should know tht all of those units were for conquers and crystals in Asia not the slightest way properly built.... and even then u took huge losses and admittedly we took even larger losses... fight us later on in this era and we will show u a proper fight...

As for us winning the era, thx for having such great faith in us TEXASRANGER but the war has only started and can go to either side... all i ask is for a fun and fair battle for perhaps my last BD battles ever ;)

Cheers and Gluck

_________________
Legendary Isotox

Winning Alliances - TLA F2, DETH F6, Milk/FPM M2, SoFe M3, HaHa M1, BoS F1

Families Associated with:- TLA, DETH, HaHa, BoS, FPM


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:51 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
When you say that we (Nam) have been turning people over to the side of IRON, do you mean the backstabs we're enduring? Because all we've done is force people off our continent.

Good luck have fun, may the better alliance win.


P.S. Despite how courteous IRON may be on here, I find it isn't shared ingame.
Image


^this was in response to me telling Iron Hand that Greenland is politically in Europe (relevant in a territory dispute in which Iron Hand was mocking us over broadcast).


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:00 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
 Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 28
Location: My computer
Gender: male
mmm when I said they were running to join their cause is because you are bossing everyone around and well you all are not making many friends that way.

first 14oc being kicked out of europe, next attacks on RAR though they had done nothing to provoke you. a few of many examples of Nam's tyranny even though they cannot even boast of being the top alliance in the world.

so therefore I laugh at your attempts at diplomacy with other alliances :lol:


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: CE & NAM vs IRON and Sub
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:50 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Posts: 32
Gender: male
We've never signed a pact with RAR, so if they're neutral/hostile we have complete freedom to attack them - surely?

And 14oC relocated of their own accord, when we were neutral, due to the threat of being kicked out by us. We later negotiated peace, so please learn your facts before forming opinions.


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
WarLingo Android Mobile Game

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl