Author |
Message |
Tom
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:30 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm Posts: 1908 Location: Lancaster, UK
|
Haha, skill, funny.
WaLR was occupied with pushing CAE out of antartica, our main force was 2 continents away when Arch took advantage of our hospitality and trust, letting them settle so close to us.
There was no skill involved, just a timely assault on a trusting ally.
Oh, and Viscount, Lancelot isn't dead, he just retired from BD, jeez.
_________________ MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky - 100740 score - M1A2) E3, M1, M2 and F1 World Admin
|
|
Top |
|
TheViscount
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:48 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:59 pm Posts: 264 Location: USA Gender: male
|
What would be considered skill then in this game?
_________________ Highest Rank: 1 Relics Held: 8
join the grog!
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 5:08 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
TheViscount wrote: What would be considered skill then in this game? Skill would be the ability to work with your fellow players, gain a high score and do this honourably and fairly. In the end, the most skill full players, are those whom are liked even by their enemies. The most skill full players are for example Unky, or someone out of this time, Morgan.
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
sawreese
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:36 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:05 pm Posts: 38 Gender: male
|
I think you can pretty much sum this up by looking at one fact, regardless of the backstab.
XXIV,or WaLR, would be able to hold out against the current attack by CAE with no problems. ARCH is heavily outnumbered, and is only surviving because luckily they were told by WaLR to build all infantry, which means CAE will be at a disadvantage type wise until their second wave of units come in.. if the battle isn't over by then. So this whole thing about ARCH being better than WaLR is absurd.
SWT2 is most likely going to attack as well as long as CAE doesn't completely mess up their attack and leave ARCH even more fortified from salvage and captured outposts than they were before.
Also, honor is not obsolete in the least, whoever said that... I took up an honor policy with SWT2 and we have been thriving. We do not attack established alliances, usually considered such when they have 5 or more members and are not ranked on the bottom few pages, until 48 ticks after a 48 tick notice is sent out... any less would be rather unhonorable. In the first era the same alliance under the tag of TO had the same standing and ranked pretty high considering we were all first time players. Honor actually makes the game a lot more interesting.
|
|
Top |
|
harry 35000
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:14 pm |
|
Second Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:18 am Posts: 207 Gender: male
|
well then guys, i was in WaLR. We were backstabbed by Arch after letting them have a gate in japan. Now they have the whole of CAE going for them, including my 250 tanks. im now in CAE2. I never lost any of my army to Arch
|
|
Top |
|
TheViscount
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:35 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:59 pm Posts: 264 Location: USA Gender: male
|
roflz why would you let them have a gate in Japan?
_________________ Highest Rank: 1 Relics Held: 8
join the grog!
|
|
Top |
|
kodak
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:40 pm |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:12 am Posts: 57
|
harry 35000 wrote: well then guys, i was in WaLR. We were backstabbed by Arch after letting them have a gate in japan. Now they have the whole of CAE going for them, including my 250 tanks. im now in CAE2. I never lost any of my army to Arch Add 350 tanks - lets talk in game - not here
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:15 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
Because we trusted Arch, we considered them a... well... a brother.
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
pjconde
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:16 am Posts: 4 Gender: male
|
Add 610 units helping CAE. I don't agree with what Arch did in anyway. They back stabbed the alliance who held them up when they couldn't stand alone. What people do now a days for victory surprises me everyday but whatever lets see if they prevail against CAE and other fellow alliances.
P.S. There was an Arch member complaining on how CAE is using allies to help in the war, well as I said with my broadcast "It isn't our fault our allies trust us. I mean after what Arch did to WaLR no one woll trust them again"
_________________ Emperor PJ of The Republic Alliance also known as LegendKiller of Legacy on some servers. I am an original member of what is the great alliance known as CAE
|
|
Top |
|
TheViscount
|
Post subject: Re: Arch > WaLR Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:59 pm Posts: 264 Location: USA Gender: male
|
Poor Arch is ever dropping in points.... Will the young UD surpass them? Once Arch is defeated.... what then? Highlander Endgame?
_________________ Highest Rank: 1 Relics Held: 8
join the grog!
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|