Or what, you will add a third huge picture to your signature?

GML main players are good, assuming something is true without having seen it is not logical. I would love to see GML main play without subs and see what happens.

And so the forum battle continues.


This was your BD reporter Rederoin of Redbull.
We will be back next week.

Or else you will be the one looking like a fool I don't need to do anything, Kane, your doing enough yourself.

Ever heard of speculating? Or just taking something for granted without seeing it ?


Did you ever see the earth from space, so you know it's round?



If not, then by your logics, the earth is flat. Good luck on that.

You don't have to be in space to know the earth is round, I suppose you've never been in a plane or another place high enough to have seen the curvature of the earth?

Besides, the earth being round is fact, people have seen it, there are centuries of scientific fact to prove it. Meanwhile GML playing without subs has not happened yet, so you are assuming an outcome with no evidence to support you while using a logical fallacy to claim it is as obvious as the earth being round.

I am the one looking like a fool? I believe I have just shown the contrary is the case my dear chum.

Just to add to it, factct is GML has always won abusing subs.

Logically speaking, without subs the great GML would have a nice run for its money, that is why GML without subs is just not happening, they know it.

If its just one alliance, who will do the dirty work for them?

Its like going to war without an army for them.

No nuke farms, massive spy attacks or the never ending sub attacks.


I"m 99% sure GML cannot play without subs.

the 1% is shiz, i'm sure she can.

The facts are there, they have always utilize subs for victories, and when a sub go the relic the guy would just go into the main. or they would take it from the sub.

Without the subs, 99% of their strategy has to change.

Why go to war using knives when all our lifetime we have used guns?

GML cannot go head on against kane, or any other alliance that has won without subs.

LOW will wipe the floor with them same as kane will if it wasn't for all the sub abuse they had.

Fact is, without subs they wouldn't last long enough to even meet them in battle.

I based my fact on the single fact that every round, they have used subs to win, they exploited them, and used every cheap tactic that has ever existed, and the fact that they never played without subs.

Only member i have seen played a round in a single alliance without multiple branches is shiz.

I wouldn't go far as to say all that now. BdT was quite disheartened by some dirty tricks indeed, but that doesn't explain some of the awful decisions that were made (yes, even by LoW).

So Patz, I appreciate the support, but I think you are bashing GML for the wrong reasons. I don't think GML would be unable to win without subs, I dislike GML because they COULD win without subs, but CHOOSE to take the easy way instead.

well, i made it clear i'm only 99% sure they can't. I didn't go all out and said it was a sure thing they couldn't.

So there's a chance they can, we just won't ever see it.

Seems I am in the middle of you two!

Apparently you are, could you get Patzz out and get back in yourself Kane?


I don't like arguing with people blinded by their own opinion and I feel insulted that I am to argu with your fanboy :S