Dude I don't think any admin told you not to attack Sold or subs.The offense of "harassment" does not exist in BD rules anywhere. You are free to attack anyone. If Simmen or anyone else gives you any more trouble and I will make sure you not only get an apology but also compensated for your troubles. Some of these admins are just clueless kids and think they have subjective judge and jury power. They don't. Trust me I have made them apologize and grovel many times.

So take care, continue playing your game as you see fit and don't worry about silly admins.
Best,

D

INDEED i should be compensated , he interviened in a battle just before my force's landed , i think i should get a life time supply of blue tokens
seriously
Dude , check my thread on this subject , i posted all his pm's too me .
titled
administer simmen interphered with gameplay

personelly if anyone is being harrassed its me !!

2.2.4 Bullying: Use Services in a manner disturbing, harassing or defaming to Users, stalking or depriving Users of any enjoyment of using Services In a manner which Tacticsoft may determine as Bullying.s.

I refuse to give any apologies before I get one from Joe for being banned for the exactly same offense
I were stupid enough to believe a friend who said it wasn't against the rules
But also smart enough that when I actually did get banned I realized that of course there had to be some rules to limit people from simply joining to spam and harass.

And to the argument "It haz to be programmed into le game, admins can't interfere with annyzing!"
From the first action in the game, which is placing a colony, you can start making multiple accounts.. That is why we in the addition to in game functions we have the rules and the admins to uphold them.

You beat me to it



As a former admin I know that rule is just annoyingly subjective. As soon as you conquer someone and they send attacks at you, they are harassing you as well. If I attack you, I harass you.

Yes, Milan. But when you build somewhere just for the purpose of harrasing one alliance in particular is when it becomes a problem.

Indeed, now the major issue is how you can prove that. When the only proof is a message on Skype, you won't be able to prove it since I don't assume either player will happily forward you a log.

Aye true. But there are some occasions where it's painfully obvious like


"here to spam"

or "I hate SoLD" (for example)

Heh yeah. Wish all cases were as obvious as that.

pl finally from simmen quote ;//Compansated?You've been listening to Daemon again haven't you?I am wondering what exactly you hoped to achieve by going to the forum.Joining to be conquered for some alliance is a pretty simple description of a farm yes. I hope you would have known this a long time ago. There is a difference between defending your colony and losing your army, which would be quite foolish and getting conquered, and then serving your conquer resource outposts and your crystal.// end quote

there he goes accusing me of building my colony for sole purpose of being their dam conquer again ?? and telling me i cant give my dam asset's away to the conquering alliance to get some leverage so i can possibley move about the country without losing everything and grow .. this is unprecidented , according to simmen anyone who "declares war against another alliance is a violation when they attack that alliance too deprive them of victory .
why do we have friends & enemy options on the forums ? hmmm to perminantly mark ppl your against or for thats why , but if im correctly understanding simmen thats incouaraging a violation for singling out someone and attacking them !! in fact everyone playing this dam game is in violation .. !!
that being said and out the way , i resumed my attacks on S0Ld and simmen has prolly banned me by now , you guyz seriously need too look at this becouse his accusations are so flemsy anypone can be banned for attacking anyone , and heavin forbid they get conquered and offer their crystal or ops to their conquerer's , wich again is in the playguides' as exceptable .