It is currently Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:11 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 463 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 47  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:58 am 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:33 pm
Posts: 14
apollo wrote:
Um last era in AI, we had ONE sub. AA, which was the best sub I've ever seen play in my life.


What about ExSo and their subs, they seem to aid you alot in that round

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:00 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:24 pm
Posts: 43
Gender: male
Syndome wrote:
Quote:
The claim "very best BD team" comes from the fact that any alliance we fight or have fought, forms a brothership with 2-10 alliances to go against us, Why is that so? Thats where the claim "very best" comes from
You did not spam? Then how come S0LD lost 7 Ops before the war began to KSM? You never set any border to me nor my leader, talking to just SoLD leader about it does not make it up because S0LD is not a sub just like you probably will say that LOH isnt a sub since i claim LoH is a sub of LoC, we are brother alliance of SoLD


You're not considered a "BD team", you're considered an "empire". A team is a group of ten people in an alliance that coordinate together actively. An empire is a group of alliances that attempt to coordinate together actively.

We did not do anything until SoLD landed in South America. The border wasn't instantly war, it was just a border-of-worry, a point where we contact you and request nicely to turn-around. Before we got the chance to message you this SoLD came about and it changed everything.

SoLD even calls you guys subs, not brothers. I have a conversation with Eddie, in which he blatantly acknowledges your presence as a sub.

Interested more-so in this conversation,
Slybrood

_________________
Alliances; KoTU; M; VVV; SoLD; SAGE; TKE; EoC; RFTA; BoS
Current Alliances; TGK
-----
Shall god have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:02 am 
Moderator
Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2000
Quote:
Like other alliances don't do that?
Last ERa Al had tons of subs, this era E2 - Hini has Tons of subs
Only way to stop this form of communistic operation is if "subs" get perma ban from the servers then you can have Main Vs main, and no friendships are allowed between alliances, no naps, no nothing from tick 1 everyone is enemys , admins get strict and ban if they see any friendly action. That would make it all "fair" game and able to take others down 1o1... Thats rather rough but its simple solution.


Since we had 0 subs, nope, we didn't do that :D

Indeed HINI had quite some subs. I don't agree with AI having a lot of subs though, they had AA. Awesome sub, you don't need other subs then.

I simply do not like the fact that SoLD operates by getting 40-50 people on a world and then just having them build up all era. That era we played they actually switched in new members when they lost their army. That's just extremely annoying when you're fighting them.

_________________
Image

Made by KazeToushin, thank you!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:04 am 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 8:48 pm
Posts: 4804
Location: Chicago, IL, USA.
Gender: male
Syndome wrote:
apollo wrote:
Um last era in AI, we had ONE sub. AA, which was the best sub I've ever seen play in my life.


What about ExSo and their subs, they seem to aid you alot in that round


We helped ExSo fight their own battles. They did not fight TBB or PRAE, which were the main enemies. They fought against PHI, and we helped them. Once ExSo won that fight, they became inactive and went to sleep.

_________________
Image
KM-AI-TwF-ARM-KR-ALLY-HORD-CME-ToW-CP-HINI-ISKC-COPS-DRAW-ROTR-KoTU
Quote:
Matt Wyman/Apollo wrote: if I've learned one thing this era, it's that theres nothing scarier than a tired juno


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:17 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:55 am
Posts: 186
Gender: male
i wanted this era to be fair game and clear.
morgan can keep it that way. all he has to be is a man of his word and respect the nap we made.
its up to him if he pulls this di** move he will ruin everything.

_________________
I am a SoLDier


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:20 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 3:24 pm
Posts: 43
Gender: male
eddie2513 wrote:
i wanted this era to be fair game and clear.
morgan can keep it that way. all he has to be is a man of his word and respect the nap we made.
its up to him if he pulls this di** move he will ruin everything.


Morgan has given you a 30 tick notice from the time he changed to show he was our brother alliance, to Christmas day to do anything you need to do. He wants it still to be fair.

_________________
Alliances; KoTU; M; VVV; SoLD; SAGE; TKE; EoC; RFTA; BoS
Current Alliances; TGK
-----
Shall god have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:33 am 
Moderator
Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2000
eddie2513 wrote:
i wanted this era to be fair game and clear.
morgan can keep it that way. all he has to be is a man of his word and respect the nap we made.
its up to him if he pulls this di** move he will ruin everything.


I take it this means the NAP has come to an end?

That seems like the correct course of action for ED indeed.. Right Matt? xD We had a whole convo on skype about this yesterday.

Quote:
Morgan has given you a 30 tick notice from the time he changed to show he was our brother alliance, to Christmas day to do anything you need to do. He wants it still to be fair.


Okay, that quite confirms it. I find that still quite nice, he could have just attacked you without warning :lol:

_________________
Image

Made by KazeToushin, thank you!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:34 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:46 pm
Posts: 77
At least, we are honest enough to include our "brother alliances" or "subs", or whatever you want to call them, in our agreements. ED and KSM could have done that from the beginning on and ED wouldn't have to come up with a cheap excuse to break our agreement. It's still backstabbing and it's not what is usually considered to be "fair".

-s0rcy

_________________
Nicknames: s0rcy, Vidar


I am a SoLDier


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:42 am 
Moderator
Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2000
I agree that it is not completely fair indeed if you had a NAP until tick 800, looking at it from your perspective. However looking at it from ED's perspective, I can see their reasoning as I am quite sure they stand a much larger chance at winning if they start the war now than if they wait until the NAP runs out.

Either way, good luck, and please do post the BRs :) I will try to get as many screenshots as possible of the progression of the territories/scores during the war.

_________________
Image

Made by KazeToushin, thank you!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Earth 1: Era 12
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:48 am 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 6:36 am
Posts: 65
Milanos wrote:
I agree that it is not completely fair indeed if you had a NAP until tick 800, looking at it from your perspective. However looking at it from ED's perspective, I can see their reasoning as I am quite sure they stand a much larger chance at winning if they start the war now than if they wait until the NAP runs out.

Either way, good luck, and please do post the BRs :) I will try to get as many screenshots as possible of the progression of the territories/scores during the war.



Obviously as one who backstabbed his own alliance members you have much to say about fairness

Its very simple - don't make a NAP if you don't plan to stand behind your word

_________________
Lobo


SoLD


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 463 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 47  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl