Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

josh0 · **Posted:** Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:24 am

Arifureta wrote:

aazaadx wrote:

This round is going to be a wash, I hear some mediocre alliance come here and challenge the whole BD community and only reply is, "I have half a life". I can't play. BD might give you that other half of life you so desperately need.

The most exciting words I heard are that Ilona, is going to reactivate her account to watch. Now I would play if she did, just to put my flag on top of her colony.

Werent you suppose to be playing? and you should know better how BD is at the moment
The same players always winning the eras with little effort most of the time, and the others just avoiding them or submit to them, i seen active players that wanna fight them and cant even get a good alliance anymore

You have no idea how many ppl told me they didnt wanna play this era because it was gonna be too hard, now it starts and theres already 5 alliances supporting the only strong alliance atm...
So much for the "fun" era i heard this would be :lol:

Ill tell you waths too hard, watching wath bd has become over the past few years.

The sad thing, is that this baboon here is right, there are alot of people complaining about "oh that era is to hard" SMH and the people that play now couldn't hold their own if a war actually happened, they would just cave in and try and hand over the relics.

Also, with the level of players playing now, you won't get a world that is as epic as they used to be. That and the moment things look bad, that alliance gives up and just says "oh we werent serious this round" The chances of you getting a serious world are very, very slim.

Arifureta · **Joined:** Thu Jul 01, 2010 9:40 pm **Posts:** 230

CptAmerica wrote:

Seems they like to complain about stuff.

We are here to challenge EVERYONE. Please bring it

CptAmerica wrote:

so quoting non proof makes it factual?

You're confusing complaining with giving out facts, i saw your little "we are only gonna have 1 sub help us" so i find it funny watching so many ppl building to help you

And like i said theres no need for proof, anyone that knows them or you will know its true, if you wanted to challenge everyone you wouldnt have gotten anyone to help so quit whining about the proof and dont get caught lying next time

And apollo, if your talking about me, let me just point out that last time i played agaisnt you, your team broke the nap several times and at the end got ppl to leave and attack us to make us lose score, really honourable too.

riski1234567dr · **Posted:** Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:40 am

@Josh, you're right. Most of the people considered "vets" nowadays are only considered so because they've been playing and boosting alot, but have very little skill and activity. They tag up with good alliances and just go along with the ride. It's a shame really. My favorite eras are ones where it's just all fighting. It's never about winning or losing, it's about having fun, and very few people seem to think of it that way, which is sad. Example: E1 a few eras ago when ARM and RUN and KoH/AnM fought. Sure, ARM lost, but I had so much fun that era. I may not have won, but I had the time of life fighting, and what made it better was that it was against my friends.

There is no better feeling in BD than fighting your friends. Except maybe conquering your nemesis xD

Pagan · **Joined:** Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:52 pm **Posts:** 67

apollo wrote:

@Josh, you're right. Most of the people considered "vets" nowadays are only considered so because they've been playing and boosting alot, but have very little skill and activity. They tag up with good alliances and just go along with the ride. It's a shame really. My favorite eras are ones where it's just all fighting. It's never about winning or losing, it's about having fun, and very few people seem to think of it that way, which is sad. Example: E1 a few eras ago when ARM and RUN and KoH/AnM fought. Sure, ARM lost, but I had so much fun that era. I may not have won, but I had the time of life fighting, and what made it better was that it was against my friends.

There is no better feeling in BD than fighting your friends. Except maybe conquering your nemesis xD

I had to comment here, you were saying before, in other thread that the era you played with us was boring because it was an easy win. I'm sorry Apollo but wining is the ultimate goal in BD and provides fun as you achieving that goal, saying that you had more fun losing, just does not wash.

It may be true that your performance would score better in a losing team than it would in the winning team. Felling as an "achiever " in a losing team is easier than when you play with best players. I'm sorry we made you feel that way.

SoF · **Joined:** Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:40 am **Posts:** 247

Pagan wrote:

apollo wrote:

@Josh, you're right. Most of the people considered "vets" nowadays are only considered so because they've been playing and boosting alot, but have very little skill and activity. They tag up with good alliances and just go along with the ride. It's a shame really. My favorite eras are ones where it's just all fighting. It's never about winning or losing, it's about having fun, and very few people seem to think of it that way, which is sad. Example: E1 a few eras ago when ARM and RUN and KoH/AnM fought. Sure, ARM lost, but I had so much fun that era. I may not have won, but I had the time of life fighting, and what made it better was that it was against my friends.

There is no better feeling in BD than fighting your friends. Except maybe conquering your nemesis xD

I had to comment here, you were saying before, in other thread that the era you played with us was boring because it was an easy win. I'm sorry Apollo but wining is the ultimate goal in BD and provides fun as you achieving that goal, saying that you had more fun losing, just does not wash.

It may be true that your performance would score better in a losing team than it would in the winning team. Felling as an "achiever " in a losing team is easier than when you play with best players. I'm sorry we made you feel that way.

oww...! *aouch!* and thats how she uses her samurai... ahahaha...! :mrgreen:

easy now my dear ^^

@Matt, amen bro!! amen!! :mrgreen:

SoF · **Joined:** Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:40 am **Posts:** 247

Arifureta wrote:

CptAmerica wrote:

Seems they like to complain about stuff.

We are here to challenge EVERYONE. Please bring it

CptAmerica wrote:

so quoting non proof makes it factual?

You're confusing complaining with giving out facts, i saw your little "we are only gonna have 1 sub help us" so i find it funny watching so many ppl building to help you

And like i said theres no need for proof, anyone that knows them or you will know its true, if you wanted to challenge everyone you wouldnt have gotten anyone to help so quit whining about the proof and dont get caught lying next time

And apollo, if your talking about me, let me just point out that last time i played agaisnt you, your team broke the nap several times and at the end got ppl to leave and attack us to make us lose score, really honourable too.

let me try to uderstand what your trying to prove sis.. correct me if im wrong... ^^

@cap america.. i think this is what she is trying to say...

at the very 1st introduction, you said,

CptAmerica wrote:

Earth's Mightiest Hero's are coming together to avenge Earth 1. Do you have what it takes to stop us?

sooo...your proposing to have a WORLD WAR correct??

then..blablabla... you final say "why"

CptAmerica wrote:

Why the eagerness?

Because the way it looks now, this round will be a wash. Our goal is to make this a competitive round, with many battles.

It will be my last fight (maybe Bucky can take over for me).

We/I have brought together all our friends to end on a good note, but I'd rather win by fighting instead of having relics handed to us.

So I'm here to stir the pot, maybe piss some people off enough to put together a challenge.

Convince me that this is STILL "BATTLE"dawn.

THE WORD CONVINCE a powerful word...

then the suddenly...below,

CptAmerica wrote:

I'm just trying to stir the pot and get as many people involved as possible. We will have allies but I do know we have a clear cut path to victory and don't plan to hurt our eyes staring at too much blue.

from my understanding earlier, you said "EVERYONE" then suddenly "we have allies" :roll:

then....

CptAmerica wrote:

Our allies have been carefully chosen in advance

which i think what she is trying to debate/argue about.... correct me if im wrong there... then suddenly below... you change your statement again.. :roll:

CptAmerica wrote:

That is not our strategy, we will have 1 sub and 1 sub only...and they are FAR from a meat shield.

What you mention is part of the reason we are doing this, we are tired of that strategy.

then your statement changed again... :roll:

CptAmerica wrote:

We do have a couple friendly alliances, but the only other group of players here to help AI is AA.

then again... :lol:

CptAmerica wrote:

The only alliance here to support AI is AA. End of story.

and again and again...soo... pls correct me if im wrong... is AI really a sub or just an ally?? :roll:

cause friendly alliance or alliance is from my understanding is different from sub...???

THEN...

CptAmerica wrote:

We have allies, like anyone else does. It would be mighty hard to win this round with only 2 alliances battling everyone else.

With that said, there are NO other alliances specifically here to support us. No other subs, brother alliances, etc. Only allies.

after all the above mentioned, you saying those...hmm...

then finally...

CptAmerica wrote:

Seems they like to complain about stuff.

We are here to challenge EVERYONE. Please bring it

AS IN EVERYONE??!

im having a migrane here now...

this is like the "Prison of Wars" Avengers where Skrulls took over almost all of the Avengers identity...disguising themselves and want to dominate the world... 8-)

NOW this is epic!! and confusing... :lol:

josh0 · **Posted:** Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:00 pm

Yes, the goal may be to win BUT, imo, it is more accomplishing to actually fight, and earn your win. Not just sit there and do nothing all era.

My favorite eras i have had on bd, i have lost. and thats due to the fact that they were challenging, and had a war, a real war that was fun. Not some "oh you killed my spam hurr my relics dunt kill me plxxx" I'd rather lose, and make a team work for a win, then just give up. I would rather work for the win then get a win handed to me.

BD is just weak now. I honestly wonder if some of the players now even understand what a fight is.

SoF · **Joined:** Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:40 am **Posts:** 247

Indeed..! by Losing, you get lots of fun from all of those epic battles! and from all of those.. you evolve further and further and learning from every single things you've done...good or wrong...rather than being a "perfectionist" the stubborn hardheaded ones...till they crack.. :mrgreen:

riski1234567dr · **Posted:** Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:45 pm

Juno, Winning is NOT the most important thing. It's about having fun. It's a game meant for people to have fun. When we played on E4, it was so boring it wasn't even funny. And please point out where I said I feel better losing than winning? Go ahead, I'll wait.

OmegaXII · **Posted:** Sat Sep 01, 2012 7:53 pm

a noob in the phillippines randomly makes 2 ops right beside an AI op and cpt america is taking them :O op farming

nah im jk, but it goes to show what i said before was true that random noobs make ops at random places so it isnt just rema who got a random op by a noob far far away

Avengers Initiative