It is currently Sun Nov 23, 2014 7:26 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 433 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:43 pm 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:09 am
Posts: 3
On the matter of 3006... We are Blue with both RUN and ARM. ARM allowed us to have relocation ops in Australia so we returned the favor. If anyone really expected them to not try to relocate then something is wrong with said person. The NAP with RUN was we give over the relic and stay out of the war. We have not attacked RUN. We havent joined in. Just kept our word to another alliance. Sorry for being men of our word...


On the matter of Van. Van was kicked because he attacked RUN TB that he felt threatened our hive. We waited hours for him to get back online to correct his mistake but he never got on so we had no choice but to kick him to keep our word. What he did after is on his own accord.


On the matter of 3006 attacking Lava. RUN2 launched 9 squads of vehichles at him with an eta of 12. RMO was moving ~500 tanks in the area. We want to finish top 3, and Lava couldnt fight off either group since he had all concussive soldiers vs tanks and vehichles. Lava also relocated into our hive rather then on the edge of it. Since inevitably he would lose his crystals we took them for ourselves so that we could go up in the standings rather then some other alliance.

In no way did we break our NAP with RUN. Nor did we have anything to do with Van going after RUN in S.A . As for Lava we asked him but he wasnt on at the time so we acted before another alliance did. We have been neutral in tis war and will continue to remain neutral in the ARM/RUN/KoH war. You guys see our alliance from the outside, we see it from the inside. Keep that in mind...


Last edited by vhi on Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:59 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:18 am
Posts: 27
I think KoH are RUN meatshields :lol:


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:00 pm 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:24 pm
Posts: 2337
Location: no location for you
Gender: female
i guess its possible, but its highly unlikely

_________________
Image
Image
PSN: aLpHaOmEgAXII


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:26 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:49 am
Posts: 231
I resent that! I am not meatshield! I am Avi multi!

_________________
Daemon of Zamorre
KoH, MGH, LWB, NWL, KoTu
Best rank:1
Most crystals: 1067
Veni vidi vici


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:12 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:16 pm
Posts: 578
Gender: male
I have alot of Respect for the players of 3006 for keeping their word in this situation. It means alot to alot of people whether you realize that or not.

_________________
Leader of 1st place "oVo" on F5
MES-2nd
E1 victories:
HaHa/HeHe
RuN

Image
Respect Few Fear None


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:02 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm
Posts: 643
Gender: male
KoH as RUN meat shields? They are probably going to win the round and no one in RUN has a problem with that. So no you are wrong tekka....but you keep up your cowardice..leaving ARMT for Palm. lol

_________________
Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND)
FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR

8+ years of Battledawn


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:16 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:16 pm
Posts: 578
Gender: male
We try our bet Gaurav :)

_________________
Leader of 1st place "oVo" on F5
MES-2nd
E1 victories:
HaHa/HeHe
RuN

Image
Respect Few Fear None


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:52 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 7
Gender: male
There are only 2 things that I could possibly have to add to this conversation. The most important thing I would like to say is that during this era I have managed to lose most of the respect I had for former admin Milan, due to nothing more than his change in heart on certain issues. This is simply a personal opinion and I don't really care what other people have to say, but this is the only place I could openly portray this and guarantee that he would see it. I don't know what happened with the ban, but the fact that he accepted the sudden popping up of a sub member in order to spam ops goes completely against the beliefs that he has portrayed to people who supported him for the past few years. Your views were simply that spammers and multies are screwed up and there is no place for them in this game. I am neutral in this fight and either way that the ARM relocation ops turned out is fine with me.

The second issue is simply me supporting Tekka in his flip flop to PALM. Tekka, Toast, Fox, and several other people including myself migrated from Kongregate in order to try one of the more difficult worlds. PALM and ND were originally paired together along with TOON as friendly alliances all trying to achieve the same goal. When Milan got banned, many of these people quit, especially in ND who started out as a slight threat but didn't have the heart to continue when their best player was banned. The few who decided to keep playing were forced to simmilate into other alliances. Tekka and Toast decided to join ARMT to continue fighting and try and better themselves. I can't honestly blame him for joining back with the alliance he originally alligned himself with. It might be inconvenient for RUN, but he tends to honor his word in these situations and at least he's finishing it out with the people he started.

I'm not 100% familiar with the politics of a .com world, especially one as chaotic and ridiculous as this e1 world, however, looking at this situation and knowing Tekka for so long, I can't say that I blame the man for going back to his roots when his alliance desides to crumble.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:51 am 
Major
Major
User avatar
 YIM  Profile

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:21 am
Posts: 2760
Location: Bangalore, India
Gender: male
I dont have any problem with Tekka or Toast, though Id have loved to take em out and get their crystals :D

As for Milan, am not sure about his views, but if he changed them, he has every right to. Views and opinions are fluid concepts.

_________________
Deadman - SYN
----------------
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ARM vs. RUN
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:55 am 
Moderator
Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 1992
Zbomb0808 wrote:
There are only 2 things that I could possibly have to add to this conversation. The most important thing I would like to say is that during this era I have managed to lose most of the respect I had for former admin Milan, due to nothing more than his change in heart on certain issues. This is simply a personal opinion and I don't really care what other people have to say, but this is the only place I could openly portray this and guarantee that he would see it. I don't know what happened with the ban, but the fact that he accepted the sudden popping up of a sub member in order to spam ops goes completely against the beliefs that he has portrayed to people who supported him for the past few years. Your views were simply that spammers and multies are screwed up and there is no place for them in this game. I am neutral in this fight and either way that the ARM relocation ops turned out is fine with me.


Hey man. I still do agree that there is no place for multies on battledawn, and I won't change that. However spamming is a legit tactic. If this guy really did intend to play, then it is just a legit strategy to start. If I was starting late and needed to build up fast, I would probably go with spamming a bunch of OPs to downgrade/raze them as well.

The spammers I have always been against were those that just placed there to spam, or those that were multies used for spamming. I think this guy actually intended to play, so I think it isn't wrong.

Also, I agree with you on Tekka. I was talking to him when he decided to leave, and he actually did it quite honorably. If he had wanted to really screw ARMT over, he would have sent out attacks, or taken leadership and disbanded. I think this was the most honorable way to do it in this case (flashback).

_________________
Image

Made by KazeToushin, thank you!


Last edited by Milanos on Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 433 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl