Author |
Message |
redwurm
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:52 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 799 Location: Ohio Gender: male
|
They abused the game.
Whoops. Sorry.
_________________ mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote: There is no clue boost. bfan8475 wrote: If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight
|
|
Top |
|
Necromancer
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:29 am |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:04 am Posts: 35 Gender: male
|
Mafia wrote: stop saying that they abused the game. it not your call, that is down to the rules. exactly. If gates were such a major problem then surely they would of updated the rules by now. By saying that we abuse the game it sounds like you are trying to make some pathetic attempt to show that you have some make believe moral highground. And overall F69 have lost significantly more than UTM have. Gaurav you didnt even show your face in these battles until you realised that F69 were taking heavy losses! It is funny because even though you know it, you will never admit that F69 messed this up.
_________________ E1 - Annatar of Mirkwood - Leader of WD
|
|
Top |
|
Southern_Smoke
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:33 pm |
|
Sergeant |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:01 pm Posts: 82 Gender: male
|
complaining about not being able to jam gates is an excuse for getting owned. if u go into battle still while already knowing that then it is on you and not the game.
apparently people underestimate others and you get arguments like these.
_________________ LOZ VETERAN
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:18 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
Necomancer, I believe that the war is about even if not in our favor. Add up your losses vs ours, and we are probably winning the resource game. Then add in the fact that we have more conquers than your alliance and crystals and you can see we can rebuild our losses much faster than UTM.
Regarding Southern_Smoke's comment, yes we underestimated the power the gates held when used defensively and we paid for it with the loss of Kane's battle. But we have learned and there is a reason we have not gone on the offense much, we wait for the jamming of gates to be implemented. While we wait, we will continue to kill any offenses against our forces as shown by the last two reports posted here.
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
willow
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:39 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:08 pm Posts: 153
|
willow wrote: Wow, this is intense!
That's some crazy combat going on. Is this considered the deciding blow in the war or merely a single battle amidst many challenges? Redwurm wrote: I'd go with the latter. Awesome! more carnage on an epic scale for us lesser beings to witness! and guys, isn't a good thing to be underestimated by your enemies? Don't let the fact that your enemies think they are doing awesomely when you know they aren't worry you. I should think just pwning the other guy silently is good enough for any of us... Action speaking louder than words and all that rot you know, eh? At least that's what Willow thinks
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
Necromancer
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:51 am |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:04 am Posts: 35 Gender: male
|
gaurav1 wrote: Necomancer, I believe that the war is about even if not in our favor. Add up your losses vs ours, and we are probably winning the resource game. Then add in the fact that we have more conquers than your alliance and crystals and you can see we can rebuild our losses much faster than UTM.
Regarding Southern_Smoke's comment, yes we underestimated the power the gates held when used defensively and we paid for it with the loss of Kane's battle. But we have learned and there is a reason we have not gone on the offense much, we wait for the jamming of gates to be implemented. While we wait, we will continue to kill any offenses against our forces as shown by the last two reports posted here. Although you may be able to reuild an army faster than us, you have lost significantly more. Just one of our members totaled up how many nuke kills he had from this war and he alone has 642 nuke kills on F69 units!
_________________ E1 - Annatar of Mirkwood - Leader of WD
|
|
Top |
|
Xeder
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:13 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:12 pm Posts: 21 Gender: male
|
Quote: Although you may be able to reuild an army faster than us, you have lost significantly more. Just one of our members totaled up how many nuke kills he had from this war and he alone has 642 nuke kills on F69 units! 642 units - so it's about 22 infrantry squads Any reports ?? Instead of words and "almost" reliable numbers I have another BR : As you can see even most active UTM needs sleep sometimes
_________________ NC: E4:A3 MupT Gonzo of ChickenLove E1:A2 XI Iceman of Drake's Castle RC Fantasy VV THHG of Antioch E1:A1 F69 Galzin of Daisho OC: NOM,ARM,SIMP
|
|
Top |
|
Maniac
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:50 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 70 Gender: male
|
HaHa - 642 nuke kills - thats funny !!
Obviously UTM are oblivious to another game glitch. Nukes don't actually kill units anymore, so shoot away !!
Nonetheless, I will admit that UTM have fought magnificently and are worthy foes. I salute you, Sirs !
However, I think that now we are entering the final acts of this little show. The noose is tightening on UTM as we close in around their colonies.
UTM quote nuke kills but we use actual kills to go by. Legends lost another 167 vehicles today for the loss of 23 of our armour a more than acceptable ratio.
Put the beer on ice UTM we'll be making house calls soon !
_________________ E4 KOA - BUL5 E4 Fozzie Bear - The Muppets E1 Juggernaut - The Xavier Institute E1 Mo of KOA - The Fighting 69th E3-A5 Mo of Kingdom of Armagh - ARM E3-A6 Barney Gumble - The Simpsons
|
|
Top |
|
Necromancer
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:34 am |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:04 am Posts: 35 Gender: male
|
Maniac wrote: HaHa - 642 nuke kills - thats funny !!
Obviously UTM are oblivious to another game glitch. Nukes don't actually kill units anymore, so shoot away !!
what are you even on about..?.. yes they clearly do.
_________________ E1 - Annatar of Mirkwood - Leader of WD
|
|
Top |
|
Gaurav
|
Post subject: Re: F69 Vs UTM Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:58 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm Posts: 687 Gender: male
|
Actually they do not, the reports will show that units were killed but instead all that happens is that the units are brought down the 1hp. The units are still there. Glitch in the game that I do believe is known to the developers.
_________________ Championship Era 2013 Winner (DoCE/VND) FORMER SENIOR MODERATOR 8+ years of Battledawn
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|