It is currently Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:25 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:33 pm 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: male
No. A valid player can place anywhere they want. The difference is not hard to spot.

A valid player isnt going to rush a bunch of 1 unit squads, drop protection and start hitting everything in sight. But then, you already know that.

I am not looking for players who actually intend to stick around and play fairly. Their primary interst is common sense, setting one-self up for the 'long haul'. You don't get that by placing in the hive of a top alliance and blowing your entire load, and protection, on suicide army.

_________________
Battle Dawn Staff
Community Management Specialist
Technical Support
World Administrator
Music Composer

Welcome to the best free multiplayer war strategy game on the web!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:02 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:06 am
Posts: 43
Location: In Your HeaD
Gender: male
i disagree then , if you allow a player to place a colony on any tick except HavoK and anywere on the map , then that player should be valid , even if player blows their resource's on spammin an alliance in their hive .

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:06 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1179
RubberrAmmo wrote:
i disagree then , if you allow a player to place a colony on any tick except HavoK and anywere on the map , then that player should be valid , even if player blows their resource's on spammin an alliance in their hive .

Do you have any valid arguments though? Its fine to disagree but if you have nothing to back yourself up, rather than it just not sitting well with you there's nothing we can do or say to help

_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Image

Retired NEWS Reporter.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:28 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:06 am
Posts: 43
Location: In Your HeaD
Gender: male
thats a little insulting i think to say my discussion isnt valid . Firstr off this aint suggestions its discussion , I already know its against the rulz and No you arent gonna change my mind on this , I think its DEAD WRONG to ban any player for attacking another player under any circumstance's , even if they follow that player to each world at tick 5000 and join , its a WAR GAME

no it dosent sit well with me that i can be banned if i plant a colony after 500 and I decide to build 50 spam and attack everything withen reach of my greedy little hungry squads So i can downgrade and raze ops , and i dont care were you build your colony in the later ticks , the top alliance's have ops everywhere and you dont have to be in there hive to get banned , their still gonna run to the administers crying im harrasing them and in my case im not .. i simply want to take their stuff and turn it into resource's so i can build my army to ultimately destroy them , i think the entire harrasment slave farming case is BS , your playing a war game , not smurF ville
Thats my message , You dont have to like it or agree with it cause ultamently it dosent matter either way , its not gonna change anything

_________________
Image


Last edited by RubberrAmmo on Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:29 pm 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:47 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: male
RubberrAmmo wrote:
i disagree then , if you allow a player to place a colony on any tick except HavoK and anywere on the map , then that player should be valid , even if player blows their resource's on spammin an alliance in their hive .


If this happened all the time, then this game would become virtually unplayable. As it stands, it is hard enough to mask when you are and are not online, as players have developed several means of testing this dynamically. It is already hard enough to manage a job, school or sleep without worrying about how many 'friends' your opponent can summon on a moment's notice to come out of nowhere and cover a gap you have been strategically setting up for days, weeks or months.

That being said, if you had to worry constantly about such dishonest means of playing , BD would become so frustrating and unplayable that honest, fair playing individuals would simply leave in droves. This would effectively destroy the game.

So, while you are entitled to your opinions, I believe it is in the best interest that we maintain a fair, honest playing field. Otherwise, why bother playing at all, let alone fairly?

_________________
Battle Dawn Staff
Community Management Specialist
Technical Support
World Administrator
Music Composer

Welcome to the best free multiplayer war strategy game on the web!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:46 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:06 am
Posts: 43
Location: In Your HeaD
Gender: male
Well guys thanks for the good conversation , im leaving it to you now cause im getting a little frustrated with it .
really enjoyed it , till next time :)

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:49 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1179
RubberrAmmo wrote:
Well guys thanks for the good conversation , im leaving it to you now cause im getting a little frustrated with it .
really enjoyed it , till next time :)


Didnt mean to insult you, I just viewed this more so as a rant than a discussion or a suggestion. :ugeek:

Hope you have a good day though :idea: :arrow:

_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Image

Retired NEWS Reporter.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:37 pm 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3362
Gender: male
princekael2 wrote:
Korupt wrote:
RubberrAmmo wrote:
its just sad they have to do that at all , In my opinion harrassment should be classified to strictly vulgar profanity and abusive flaming language via pm's and BC's , not attacks .

Okay then let me propose a situation for you and see how you feel about it after that. A person does very well on a round and his alliance of hand picked players dominates another skilled alliance. Now the next round that player goes to place his one of the people he beat comes when he is just starting the round and boosts just to suicide into him and he does that not just on one round but every round he finds the player that beat him. Does that not ruin this game for the original player? And all that simply because he beat someone, now you may say this is a rare case but unfortunately it is not that rare so my question is do you think that person placing and trolling him constantly should really be allowed to continue that harassment?

if that person has the money to boost those tokens, and wants to, whats to stop him from doing it? ur trying to tell me if u beat me on F1 i shouldnt be allowed to place F1 near u and fight u early in the round ever again?

A difference exists between beating someone and just trying to ruin their round. In the first one you are going for the win and you take them on in a straight fight in the second you simply place and suicide into them or place in a strategic location and spam their network. Something like that.

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:03 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:06 am
Posts: 43
Location: In Your HeaD
Gender: male
No its wrong , battledawn's policy to ban spammers makes no sence because no reason thats been given dosent already happen ingame all game long . And your allowed to plant a colony anytime anywere ..just dont attack the supporter guy or you might get banned because their pampered babys .

I really believe its an option of class awarded as favoratism , oh my precious supporter guy did that big bad spammer hurt you !!! i'll fix it and ban him ok .. all better ? now you pm me next time anybody attacks you and i'll check them out real good and ban them to . now go back to oppressing the world honey .

wussys

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Spammers getting banned
PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:21 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:32 pm
Posts: 215
Seth wrote:
RubberrAmmo wrote:
i disagree then , if you allow a player to place a colony on any tick except HavoK and anywere on the map , then that player should be valid , even if player blows their resource's on spammin an alliance in their hive .


If this happened all the time, then this game would become virtually unplayable. As it stands, it is hard enough to mask when you are and are not online, as players have developed several means of testing this dynamically. It is already hard enough to manage a job, school or sleep without worrying about how many 'friends' your opponent can summon on a moment's notice to come out of nowhere and cover a gap you have been strategically setting up for days, weeks or months.

That being said, if you had to worry constantly about such dishonest means of playing , BD would become so frustrating and unplayable that honest, fair playing individuals would simply leave in droves. This would effectively destroy the game.

So, while you are entitled to your opinions, I believe it is in the best interest that we maintain a fair, honest playing field. Otherwise, why bother playing at all, let alone fairly?

seth there is a fine difference between the circumstances ur describing and what admins (HI SIMMEN I STILL DONT LIKE YOU!!) actually ban players for doing, both under the same impression. i placed once on E1 just to watch, i was there since tick one. i dont usually play earth so i didnt know any of the players, exept for 1 team which was DEF, them having backstabbed me in a fantasy era not too long before that point in time. i was in africa just watching, i was though building units and structures and logging in daily. when i got my xtal i had bout 2 squads of ranged vechs. CBop, who had me conquered at that point in time, msged me and asked if i could move my units so they could take my xtal. he said no point in dying for it, and waited till i got on the next day before taking it. once he took my xtal, he left me in peace again. once CBop was getting destroyed by DEF, things changed. DEF decided to send units at my colony to kill what i had, and to reconquer me, my conquer having died just a little bit before that. i at that point split all my squads into teams of 3, 1 armor 2 range, and started spamming DEF's OPs. i asked them nicely to stop attacking me, and i didnt need 2 spam them either. the next time i logged into BD, i was banned. once i went on E1, i was banned for being a farm placed just to help a team, when this was not the case. He didnt lift my ban, but i had to wait my 24 hours, and got conquered in F1, where i was a member of M, who as u know just won the era ;). was my ban fair? i think not, but simmen banned me for doing it anyways. does this have anything simular to the situation you described, no. thats a good reason why its not completly fair. in extreme circumstances where people just place and spam i believe they should be banned. but simmen had NO right to ban me at that point in time. i from then on decided never to pay a penny to BD again, i was once a supporter but i wont support ever again thanks to simmen's unfair ban. he cost me 20 conquerers (they got released when i got conquered) on F1, for NOTHING at all. you review what happened, and if u still think i should have been banned then w/e. but you are a fair admin, i think you will see the unjust that occured that day. i lost 3rd place to raider by 100 score, had i been not banned, i would have been 3rd, but i got 4th.

_________________
like a true phoenix i burn short and bright, once i burn out, i am revived to burn once more ;)


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl