It is currently Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:45 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:43 am
Posts: 78
Location: Lebanon
Gender: male
There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND.
VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them
if only murija was leading HINI for win
rania was leading her team for win
and morgan leading his team for win
just like e1 era 9
that my friends i would call a "championship era"

_________________
Played in: aRaB,AL,AOD,HIGH,NewB,ReV,nWo,FMJ,HINI,NASA,RoL
Most Rank:1
Most Power:287
Most Overhead:252%
Best Result:156 Power(1 Silver Star) At Tick 122
145 Conqueror At Tick 122
1006 Inf At Tick 122


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:00 am 
Moderator
Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 1996
francois1996 wrote:
There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND.
VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them
if only murija was leading HINI for win
rania was leading her team for win
and morgan leading his team for win
just like e1 era 9
that my friends i would call a "championship era"


I totally disagree. If we weren't there you would have GML with an empire and SAGE with an empire.

_________________
Image

Made by KazeToushin, thank you!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:27 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:43 am
Posts: 78
Location: Lebanon
Gender: male
and your telling HINI isnt an empire?
or KoH isnt an empire?
or RUN isnt an empire?
you must be kidding

_________________
Played in: aRaB,AL,AOD,HIGH,NewB,ReV,nWo,FMJ,HINI,NASA,RoL
Most Rank:1
Most Power:287
Most Overhead:252%
Best Result:156 Power(1 Silver Star) At Tick 122
145 Conqueror At Tick 122
1006 Inf At Tick 122


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 12:31 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:17 am
Posts: 74
francois1996 wrote:
and your telling HINI isnt an empire?
or KoH isnt an empire?
or RUN isnt an empire?
you must be kidding



true.

_________________
trajic/Crazy Rider


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:16 pm 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:35 am
Posts: 601
Gender: male
francois1996 wrote:
There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND.
VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them
if only murija was leading HINI for win
rania was leading her team for win
and morgan leading his team for win
just like e1 era 9
that my friends i would call a "championship era"


I don't think you can blame VND for this, everyone who wanted to win CE got a lot of allies (excluding cbop) and so did VND they were just better so they are winning simple...
and i dont see any harm in the best players coming together to win an era

_________________
Thank you matt and ilona !! :D :D


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:51 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:46 pm
Posts: 77
Varidhish wrote:
francois1996 wrote:
There was only one problem in e6 for being lame, its bcz of VND.
VND includes some of the best leaders (murija, rania, morgan), best players in bd (syrinx, odin, deadman,...) plus they are all active and have lots of players helping them
if only murija was leading HINI for win
rania was leading her team for win
and morgan leading his team for win
just like e1 era 9
that my friends i would call a "championship era"


I don't think you can blame VND for this, everyone who wanted to win CE got a lot of allies (excluding cbop) and so did VND they were just better so they are winning simple...
and i dont see any harm in the best players coming together to win an era


What do we need a champions' era for if the most active players around simply team up in one empire? Whether there is harm or not, it is LAME and that's what this thread is about.

_________________
Nicknames: s0rcy, Vidar


I am a SoLDier


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 4:02 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
 Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 1996
francois1996 wrote:
and your telling HINI isnt an empire?
or KoH isnt an empire?
or RUN isnt an empire?
you must be kidding


That is my point.. The empires run the worlds nowadays. So you can blame VND, but it is simply the way to win given the current mechanics of the game.

Quote:
What do we need a champions' era for if the most active players around simply team up in one empire? Whether there is harm or not, it is LAME and that's what this thread is about.


This however is not true. If we had all the active players we wouldn't really have needed to fight wars. I'd say CBop is about as active as VND most of the time, many in GML were also extremely active during the war. Many in SAGE's empire were also active.. So no, I don't agree.

Besides, Battledawn isn't only about activity :)

_________________
Image

Made by KazeToushin, thank you!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:48 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:46 pm
Posts: 77
We all know that fighting wars on an era like this requires extreme activity. Not too many players around can (and want to) actually bring it. If VND absorbs so many of those in their teams, obviously there will be less alliances who are able to compete. I think that's what francois was talking about. If we didnt have one super-coalition here, it would surely be a less one-sided era and probably a more interesting one. Or we would need another guy like daemon to form another super-coalition :D

_________________
Nicknames: s0rcy, Vidar


I am a SoLDier


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:32 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 7:00 pm
Posts: 799
Location: Ohio
Gender: male
I think the lack of more teams is the only real downfall here. I'm partially to blame in that fact since I did not put together my own team (I did try though).

_________________
mL / AI / Prr / ROTR / Meow / KM
Oluvai wrote:
There is no clue boost.
bfan8475 wrote:
If i cant put up better comebacks to your insults then its called bullying since i cant put up a fight


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Sort of lame Champion Era?
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2013 1:05 am 
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:35 am
Posts: 601
Gender: male
bleaky wrote:
We all know that fighting wars on an era like this requires extreme activity. Not too many players around can (and want to) actually bring it. If VND absorbs so many of those in their teams, obviously there will be less alliances who are able to compete. I think that's what francois was talking about. If we didnt have one super-coalition here, it would surely be a less one-sided era and probably a more interesting one. Or we would need another guy like daemon to form another super-coalition :D


lol :p
well SoLD can still make things interesting ;)

_________________
Thank you matt and ilona !! :D :D


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl