| Author |
Message |
|
YesNoMaybe
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM  Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:42 am |
|
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:20 am
Posts: 462
Gender: male
|
Steve and Pedro got caught in a spy trap.  
_________________
Quote: [19:00:21] Alexander: thats my opinion, maybe its (Want to be allies? Sometimes I like to pretend I am a princess riding a pony..)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:51 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1183
|
Tra3 wrote: Botelharareborn wrote: YesNoMaybe wrote: Well, now BEER, HINI and who knows who else have joined the war on CHAM's side. The pincer is tightening, unfortunately. Dont try to blame someone.. we dont have any interest in fighting you its is CHAMvs TLA and CBop now we killed 200 tanks yesterday, i ensure you that more are coming game on, it seems some of CBop players are getting a little tired of constants attacks.. dont worry , those attacks will continue 24/7 regards, Andre Clearly have never been in a major war. What was that about BEER you not accepting help or something  Silly people. The more the merrier
_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Tom
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:41 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 1908
Location: Lancaster, UK
|
Milanos wrote: Tom wrote: Faye was caught by an early tick roll. We don't see it as a particularly difficult roadblock, and eagerly anticipate BEER's inevitable involvement in this war. CBop has proven time and again to be unshakeable when defending. Hate to disagree but while defending against VND CBop lost all units, got conquered, and nuked repeatedly, and then dropped to rank 44. I'd say that's quite.. Shaken  That is not to say you didn't get back up well, because you did. Lovely to see that. We lost our units deliberately to harm VND's rank. We knew exactly what we were doing, and the majority of CBop has remained unconquered all round. We weren't shaken at all, it was all planned. As we've displayed, rank doesn't mean a thing this early in the era. So no, I wouldn't say we were shaken at all, otherwise we wouldn't have fended off HU with such ease, ne?
_________________
MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG
Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky - 100740 score - M1A2)
E3, M1, M2 and F1 World Admin
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:46 pm |
|
| Lieutenant Major |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2047
|
|
Sure you lost the units deliberately.. That part I can believe. The part I don't believe was deliberate was losing a war early round and losing that many units early round.
_________________
Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
aister
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:48 am
Posts: 7996
Location: Fuyuki City
Gender: male
|
Tom wrote: otherwise we wouldn't have fended off HU with such ease, ne? Tom wrote: ne? Tom wrote: ne?
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Tom
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:12 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm
Posts: 1908
Location: Lancaster, UK
|
Milanos wrote: Sure you lost the units deliberately.. That part I can believe. The part I don't believe was deliberate was losing a war early round and losing that many units early round. We moved all of the units to the colony you attacked knowing full well what you had and what we had. I'm not sure how we could have done that accidentally. I also don't see how you think we were somehow unaware of the repercussions. I don't think we lost the war at all. We smashed HU straight afterwards, and I don't think they'll ever be recovering.
_________________
MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG
Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky - 100740 score - M1A2)
E3, M1, M2 and F1 World Admin
|
|
| Top |
|
|
generated-305b0c6e18f5176-1522328841
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:40 am |
|
| Private |
 |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:07 am
Posts: 0
Gender: male
|
Tom wrote: Milanos wrote: Sure you lost the units deliberately.. That part I can believe. The part I don't believe was deliberate was losing a war early round and losing that many units early round. We moved all of the units to the colony you attacked knowing full well what you had and what we had. I'm not sure how we could have done that accidentally. I also don't see how you think we were somehow unaware of the repercussions. I don't think we lost the war at all. We smashed HU straight afterwards, and I don't think they'll ever be recovering. well HU is no more and u guys did an awesome job killing them 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Milanos
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 2:24 am |
|
| Lieutenant Major |
|
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 2047
|
Tom wrote: Milanos wrote: Sure you lost the units deliberately.. That part I can believe. The part I don't believe was deliberate was losing a war early round and losing that many units early round. We moved all of the units to the colony you attacked knowing full well what you had and what we had. I'm not sure how we could have done that accidentally. I also don't see how you think we were somehow unaware of the repercussions. I don't think we lost the war at all. We smashed HU straight afterwards, and I don't think they'll ever be recovering. Like I said, you lost the units deliberately. And even there not completely, considering the nuke that damaged about 60-70 squads was supposed to be ioned (by Kenny, I heard). Either way, the part I do not believe was deliberate was losing the war. You can't honestly say that when this round started you planned to lose all your units by tick 220, have had a lot of nukes on your head and have to start all over. You started over very well, but you can't really call that planned
_________________
Won both Championship Eras as rank 1.. Waiting to make it 3 out of 3.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Lolowut
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:10 pm |
|
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 3:53 pm
Posts: 532
Gender: male
|
Milanos wrote: Tom wrote: Milanos wrote: Sure you lost the units deliberately.. That part I can believe. The part I don't believe was deliberate was losing a war early round and losing that many units early round. We moved all of the units to the colony you attacked knowing full well what you had and what we had. I'm not sure how we could have done that accidentally. I also don't see how you think we were somehow unaware of the repercussions. I don't think we lost the war at all. We smashed HU straight afterwards, and I don't think they'll ever be recovering. Like I said, you lost the units deliberately. And even there not completely, considering the nuke that damaged about 60-70 squads was supposed to be ioned (by Kenny, I heard). Either way, the part I do not believe was deliberate was losing the war. You can't honestly say that when this round started you planned to lose all your units by tick 220, have had a lot of nukes on your head and have to start all over. You started over very well, but you can't really call that planned Milanos wrote: Either way, the part I do not believe was deliberate was losing the war. Where in this do you see the loss? We gained an era-friendly ally (though you guys don't like to act like it.), and we killed the target who first started the war in the first place. Post-HU CBop held the most res ops it has all game, and if we consider the positioning CBop would be in due to HU being alive, the res ops would be less, and we may have had a slightly larger inf army. I've yet to meet a man more annoying than Kane on the forums, but you may just take the cake. Now shut up and go focus on your war with SAGE, if you're not careful all this piss you've spread over this topic will go to waste.
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Slinkybd
|
Post subject: Re: CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:14 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm
Posts: 1183
|
|
Stuff is going down! Is this war still on-going?
_________________
BoS (E4) NUKE (Fantasy)
Retired NEWS Reporter.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
