Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

Botelharareborn · **Posted:** Thu Apr 25, 2013 5:01 pm

Lolowut wrote:

gaurav1 wrote:

Eh this is a horrible indicator of CHAM players activity and tactics vs CBop. CBop came into the round looking to be active and play seriously for a win. CHAM is made up of all players that were either here to just watch or train fellow friends.

CHAM when it is its usual UN alliance with all members are definitely an alliance to be feared. Most of the CBop guys found that out last E4 when they lost to UN and allies. I am sure CHAM will regroup even this era and I don't think CBop will find that too be as easy as they think this war might be atm.

Still very early in this round and this war.

From what I observed in E4, the deciding factor was not UN, who got beat up until LION joined that war.

If they were here to 'just watch' and 'train' why are most of them mass boosters?

lol mass boosters?

i dont think so.. xD

Lolowut · **Posted:** Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:24 pm

Botelharareborn wrote:

Lolowut wrote:

gaurav1 wrote:

Eh this is a horrible indicator of CHAM players activity and tactics vs CBop. CBop came into the round looking to be active and play seriously for a win. CHAM is made up of all players that were either here to just watch or train fellow friends.

CHAM when it is its usual UN alliance with all members are definitely an alliance to be feared. Most of the CBop guys found that out last E4 when they lost to UN and allies. I am sure CHAM will regroup even this era and I don't think CBop will find that too be as easy as they think this war might be atm.

Still very early in this round and this war.

From what I observed in E4, the deciding factor was not UN, who got beat up until LION joined that war.

If they were here to 'just watch' and 'train' why are most of them mass boosters?

lol mass boosters?

i dont think so.. xD

I'm glad that you didn't even try to refute the first line.

leopro · **Joined:** Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:29 am **Posts:** 19

Lolowut wrote:

If they were here to 'just watch' and 'train' why are most of them mass boosters?

mass boosters???
i built all my structures this era while i was still under protection without boosting once!
i did have some blue tokens from last era we won in e4 but i never even once bought red tokens in this game in any era!

you talk about mass boosting while your alliance jumped from power 900+ to 1100+ in 1 day after losing armour squads

p.s. the fact that you had a lower score when you started the war is irrelevant. the first impact is the strongest and you had the advantage of 4 (TLAs too) alliances attacking just 1 in all places at the same time, you just couldn't cut it and now you are on the defensive side bragging for killing 1 banned player (wrongly accused and strangely banned 1 tick before attack).

this era is meaningless for us, we were here to watch, if you want revenge after you lost as BYZ you should do it in an era where we are serious too. if you win here it means nothing.

aister · **Posted:** Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:38 pm

SimonK2 · **Joined:** Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:58 pm **Posts:** 5

Milanos wrote:

[...]The differences in squad counts are just so small this era that you really have to rely on tactics and on activity.. I love it.

Well said.

Lionheart13 · **Joined:** Wed May 16, 2012 6:49 pm **Posts:** 39

Lolowut wrote:

gaurav1 wrote:

Eh this is a horrible indicator of CHAM players activity and tactics vs CBop. CBop came into the round looking to be active and play seriously for a win. CHAM is made up of all players that were either here to just watch or train fellow friends.

CHAM when it is its usual UN alliance with all members are definitely an alliance to be feared. Most of the CBop guys found that out last E4 when they lost to UN and allies. I am sure CHAM will regroup even this era and I don't think CBop will find that too be as easy as they think this war might be atm.

Still very early in this round and this war.

From what I observed in E4, the deciding factor was not UN, who got beat up until LION joined that war.

...

We never deny the significant role our allies played.

It is because of this, in fact, we chose VND's side. We don't forget our friends, and there are many players (great players mind you) who helped us that are with VND or their subs. Can you imagine how it would have been had we picked the other side?

We're a watching alliance put in a game changing situation. As always, we never fail

.

Lastly, don't forget CBop attacked us. And we pushed them back to the initial border after their sudden attack moved us back to scandanavia's shoreline. Is this any indication to how better our response has been?

Note: Can we keep this topic clean? Mass boosting cheaters? Are you trying to insult us? Stick to the game.

lifenstuff · **Posted:** Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:45 pm

leopro wrote:

Lolowut wrote:

If they were here to 'just watch' and 'train' why are most of them mass boosters?

mass boosters???
i built all my structures this era while i was still under protection without boosting once!
i did have some blue tokens from last era we won in e4 but i never even once bought red tokens in this game in any era!

you talk about mass boosting while your alliance jumped from power 900+ to 1100+ in 1 day after losing armour squads

p.s. the fact that you had a lower score when you started the war is irrelevant. the first impact is the strongest and you had the advantage of 4 (TLAs too) alliances attacking just 1 in all places at the same time, you just couldn't cut it and now you are on the defensive side bragging for killing 1 banned player (wrongly accused and strangely banned 1 tick before attack).

this era is meaningless for us, we were here to watch, if you want revenge after you lost as BYZ you should do it in an era where we are serious too. if you win here it means nothing.

SOME OF YOU ARE mass boosters, and the point is you guys are boosting when you say you just want to watch. watchers don't boost...

Anarchist69x · **Joined:** Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:30 pm **Posts:** 371

Someone needs a nap.

Lionheart13 · **Joined:** Wed May 16, 2012 6:49 pm **Posts:** 39

lifenstuff wrote:

leopro wrote:

Lolowut wrote:

If they were here to 'just watch' and 'train' why are most of them mass boosters?

mass boosters???
i built all my structures this era while i was still under protection without boosting once!
i did have some blue tokens from last era we won in e4 but i never even once bought red tokens in this game in any era!

you talk about mass boosting while your alliance jumped from power 900+ to 1100+ in 1 day after losing armour squads

p.s. the fact that you had a lower score when you started the war is irrelevant. the first impact is the strongest and you had the advantage of 4 (TLAs too) alliances attacking just 1 in all places at the same time, you just couldn't cut it and now you are on the defensive side bragging for killing 1 banned player (wrongly accused and strangely banned 1 tick before attack).

this era is meaningless for us, we were here to watch, if you want revenge after you lost as BYZ you should do it in an era where we are serious too. if you win here it means nothing.

SOME OF YOU ARE mass boosters, and the point is you guys are boosting when you say you just want to watch. watchers don't boost...

Have you heard of VIP seats?

Slinkybd · **Joined:** Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:20 pm **Posts:** 1183

How many times has this thread gotten side tracked

CBop, ICG, & TLA vs CHAM