It is currently Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:46 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours



Forum rules


Please stay on topic.

Please respect other community members moderators and administrators.

No spam.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ranking
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:12 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 12:11 pm
Posts: 236
i think that all time ranking should be back. because i personally play from almost de beggining and there are many players who plays for a long time and i want to be fair for all.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:15 pm 
Sergeant
Sergeant
 Profile

Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:32 pm
Posts: 120
why ? i was #29 alltimes , but............. then again they should bring it back cuz i worked to hard to end up in that spot


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:20 pm 
Sr. Moderator
Sr. Moderator
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:09 am
Posts: 3329
Gender: male
I can see your point in this but I can also argue the fact that it may not really be skill but merely a measure of time played. I think you can imagine how that could negatively impact newer players.

_________________
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:27 pm 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 1419
Gender: female
We are at the moment thinking of adding a new all time list. Maybe most wins, most streaks, most ladder points ever? What are your ideas? What would you like to see as factor?

_________________
Community Manager BattleDawn/ SuperMechs
BattleDawn on Facebook


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:51 pm 
Sergeant
Sergeant
 Profile

Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:32 pm
Posts: 120
but it will end up the same then :lol: so it doesn't matters if u bring it back cuz , the old alltimes had the most wins like optimus prime (he will never lose his spot) and highest streaks like niko1313 ( above 300+)

so whats the diffrence ?? :?


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 7:01 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 Profile

Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 12:11 pm
Posts: 236
i guess the all time ranking must be about wich battle is harder. for example...many players with very high winning streak are dwelling at lvl 16, 17, 18, 19. I, for example, play at lvl 30 +, where the battle are much harder, i play against expericenced opponents, and i dont have such high win streak. so , from my point of view, the all time ranking must include the all time battles and the level wich the players are battleing.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:07 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
 Profile

Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:18 am
Posts: 13
all the damage done over the whole career.

Image

_________________
Ironhide


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:19 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:36 pm
Posts: 40
Ilona wrote:
We are at the moment thinking of adding a new all time list. Maybe most wins, most streaks, most ladder points ever? What are your ideas? What would you like to see as factor?


something on the lines of the ELO system:

The Elo system was invented as an improved chess rating system and is also used in many other games. It is also used as a rating system for multiplayer competition in a number of video games,[1] and has been adapted to team sports including association football, American college football, basketball, Major League Baseball, and eSports.
The difference in the ratings between two players serves as a predictor of the outcome of a match. Two players with equal ratings who play against each other are expected to score an equal number of wins. A player whose rating is 100 points greater than his or her opponent's is expected to score 64%; if the difference is 200 points, then the expected score for the stronger player is 76%.[2]
A number represents a player's Elo rating and increases or decreases based upon the outcome of games between rated players. After every game, the winning player takes points from the losing one. The difference between the ratings of the winner and loser determines the total number of points gained or lost after a game. In a series of games between a high-rated player and a low-rated player, the high-rated player is expected to score more wins. If the high-rated player wins, then only a few rating points will be taken from the low-rated player whereas if the lower rated player scores an upset win, then many rating points will be transferred. The lower rated player will also gain a few points from the higher rated player in the event of a draw. The rating system thus is self-correcting. A player whose rating is too low should, in the long run, do better than the rating system predicts and thereby gain rating points until the rating reflects his or her true playing strength.

This system would actually keep it fair for everyone regardless of what level they are playing at... it ranks solely on skill with very little room for error

more info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system

_________________
"THERE ARE NO RULES IN WAR... MAN IS ONLY LIMITED TO WHAT HE CAN & CANNOT DO"

also owner of M-1 Zeus


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl