It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2014 4:56 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours



Forum rules


1.) No trolling. If you cant have fun without being a jerk to others, find some other forum to QQ
2.) No inappropriate/vulgar/sexually explicit posting. Staff reserves the right to deem anything they see fit as inappropriate.
3.) Have fun and don't post anything not geared at having fun!
4.) Please respect staff members and their decisions at all times. If you cannot accept a staff or moderator decision, please appeal to admin Seth.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Battle galaxy vs battledawn
PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:04 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 1626
Location: in my happy place
Gender: male
hassanwaseem wrote:
socialmisfit1 wrote:
you should find the best 5 ranked galaxy players and combine thier scores then the best 5 earth players combine thier scores and see who has best combined scores.

then that is fair way of deciding who is better.



the best players aren't decided by score...there are many reasons they are chosen to be the best :/

score is the only fair and certain way that it could be proven one way or the other.

_________________
ALLIANCES: PPC, FurY, WN

BEST RANK: 1
MOST CRYSTALS: 142
BEST POWER: 261
IGN: BAZINGA

BD:
Image

BG:
Image

free tokens!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Battle galaxy vs battledawn
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:25 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:11 pm
Posts: 4
It seams some people don't know much about BD galaxy and some people are to materialistic to see what is really important here.

I am Lampar leader of TSS and so far I have won 4 repeated eras on galaxy 4 1 tick world.

If someone has any experience on galaxy worlds I believe I can safely say I can be one of those that can say they have. I only play on G4 but I know people from galaxy worlds as well as on original worlds.

I have also tried playing on original worlds so I know how things are there as well.

Firstly socialmisfit1 to say that score is all that matters is just wrong and it just shows how small your world is. I will explain why this is wrong as you will read along.

The first thing is the difference between original and galaxy worlds. I will skip the graphics part and the game play is basically the same except one thing with a spy that they have not repaired yet but I will skip that.

It's the players. On galaxy people come for many reasons but in general two things are true.
1. they are lass active and
2. they don't boost red tokens as much

Saying they are noobs and so on is like saying that galaxy players are stupider than the players on normal worlds so I believe socialmisfit1 here owes a number of people an apology.

So why do I personally play on Galaxy world and not on original world?
1. because the timer for ticks is far more precise on galaxy as I'm comfortable to wait until 20 sec to the end of the tick to send my units while on original maps I saw that timer being off for 2 minutes and I lost an army because of this

2. boosters. You can have all the strategy you want but if people have a lot of money to spend they will if nothing else severely put you down and make you unable to move foreword. On galaxy you don't see the strategy where you attack an OP and they turn that OP to TB boost like crazy and make over 100 cruisers in 1 tick on it. Booster strategy right there and I hate this.

I will not spend money on online games but I like playing BD so that is why Galaxy world is for me

3. far lass cheaters with farms and multies using all those programs that I will not name here. When you see one third of colonies being multies you ask your self ... what am I doing here?

These three pointes are shared with a number of my fellow galaxy players.

Sadly I must inform you socialmisfit1 that as far as strategies go Galaxy players are not worse than original world players. In fact as a leader it's actually a bit harder for me because my members have school and work and I must plan attacks with delays and knowing people in advance when they will be online and when not. This means I have actually more work to do than some leader on original worlds where he doens't have such a problem with inactivety. Real life plays a big role to my members and it is seen as priority so having a member that is online 24/7 is very rare and someone that isn't greedy even rarer.

Also I fought agenst alliances like WFA that are known from original worlds and agents Luffy, Lord V, Rikimaru, Master Player, Nokia and more and I can safely say that galaxy members were able to do just as well as they did. I personally don't know how well they are known but I think Luffy is winning an era on Earth world right now.

As for score. It does reflect how good a player is but only to some extend. A score can be made by simply being very active or just by boosting reds. I have seen people sit on their colonies and getting fat by boosting and making def units only just so they could be number one. Sadly when it comes to actual war later on they were horrible and usually greedy in nature leaving their alliances just to get some tokens and their name on the rank score.

I will gladly give such a player in exchange for a player I can trust and will sacrifice for his members if needed even if his score is half of the booster guy.

So no I strongly object to the fact that score alone shows how good a player is and saying so just makes it sound so wrong that I feel sad for you socialmisfit1.

Any more questions?


Last edited by lampar20 on Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Battle galaxy vs battledawn
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:29 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:20 am
Posts: 228
Location: pickpocketing u
u missed MT,AKA and pfft lampar :D

and zeus(pfft leader)is leading the number 1 alliance in e1 right now

take that socialmisfit1 :twisted:

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Battle galaxy vs battledawn
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:18 am 
Lieutenant Major
Lieutenant Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 1626
Location: in my happy place
Gender: male
hassanwaseem wrote:
take that socialmisfit1


what ever did I do to deserve that?! :cry:

_________________
ALLIANCES: PPC, FurY, WN

BEST RANK: 1
MOST CRYSTALS: 142
BEST POWER: 261
IGN: BAZINGA

BD:
Image

BG:
Image

free tokens!


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Battle galaxy vs battledawn
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:38 am 
Private
Private
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:11 pm
Posts: 4
socialmisfit1 wrote:
hassanwaseem wrote:
then why was battlegalaxy created then?

for noobs. aren't you listening to me?



Your asking O_O?

You basickly called every galaxy player a noob.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: Battle galaxy vs battledawn
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:05 pm 
Specialist
Specialist
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:55 pm
Posts: 24
The only issue for me would be,i play both Battle Galaxy and Battle Dawn. :D


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
WarLingo Android Mobile Game

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl