It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:52 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:26 am 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:32 pm
Posts: 15
Here is what I have pieced together. Not all of this is fact. What is fact will be marked with a (*). Things marked with a (-) are just edjucated guesses by me.

* The coalition was planning a major offensive against rap3. uArm was trying to find a way out of this offensive because we were allied with rap3.

*rap3 and AoD did not like each other. They broadcasted many threats towards each other.

-At some point rap3 found out about the intended attack by the coalition. They contacted AoD and planned a pre-strike against the United Coalition.

*Tick 350 or so, AoD back stabs uWP. Angel states "We did not backstab, we are not members of the coalition."

*Tick 325 or so, rap3 begins to build radars and gates in uArm's territory. uArm does nothing about this because they are allied with rap3 and assume they are just passing through.

*Tick 350 or so, rap3 launches attack on uArm.


I find these methods to be pathectic. I don't mind backstabbing in the late rounds.... at that point it does help a team clinch the final spot, but this early in the game is just poor sportsmanship. I for one will never be apart of such nasty alliance and I will never count any of the players in those alliances as friendly again.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:47 am 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:00 pm
Posts: 71
Gender: male
wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah moan moan moan moan moan moan.... Inco and fabreeze conquered me there cheaters.... LOL your pathetic dude Edwin said Rape will have no allies who we dont already have allied im sorry your alliance was marked red and we were ordered to administer a 2 on 8 rap3 of your alliance.

_________________
Highest alliance (Member):
#11 E4 UTM

Highest alliance (Leader):
E5 GS #1

Highest personal rank: #4
Highest power: 111
Career relics held: 4
Highest crystal count: 127

OC name: Incoherent


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 2:03 am 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:40 am
Posts: 275
Gender: male
Milamber, stop spreading your crappy lies about us being allies with you...LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR WITH EVERYONE ASSOCIATED WITH F5:

RAP3 will NEVER be allies with ANYONE. uARM was never marked allies...Now quit the whining and enjoy paying those taxes.

_________________
Image

S-KaY<3 says:
*i live on the BD forum xD
*i'm there 25/8


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 9:13 am 
Major
Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:22 am
Posts: 3857
Location: Spam Section
Gender: male
For all of you who actually no Psychomantisx, well for one thing. He doesn't like peace, neither does the rest of the alliance.

And wow, bad sportsmanship for killing an alliance early on? How is that bad sportsmanship at all?

_________________
Quote:
After months of not speaking
Numair: You still alive? This was my only way to actually see if your online
Zhester: *You're :D


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 8:18 pm 
Private 1st class
Private 1st class
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:32 pm
Posts: 15
the reason I call it bad sportsmanship is because of this.... how many players do you know of that actually stick around a game that allows them to be conquered in the first 10th of a round? I stick around because I have been playing BD for a good 2 years now and know how to rebuild, but a newb will quit because their entire alliance was crippled so early in the game.

The reason BD always loosed 2/3 of the players by tick 4000 is that most of the players are newbs that are trying the game out for the first time. I was lucky because my first experience was with some top notch players. Some players aren't as lucky as me.

Most of you will say that keeping those players who will quit that early around is pointless, but BD will never grow and will stagnate if all the donating players get on one team and lay waste to alliances that thought them to be friendly. New players will never stick around if this kind of thing happens every era.


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 10:58 pm 
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:40 am
Posts: 275
Gender: male
Milamber wrote:
the reason I call it bad sportsmanship is because of this.... how many players do you know of that actually stick around a game that allows them to be conquered in the first 10th of a round? I stick around because I have been playing BD for a good 2 years now and know how to rebuild, but a newb will quit because their entire alliance was crippled so early in the game.

The reason BD always loosed 2/3 of the players by tick 4000 is that most of the players are newbs that are trying the game out for the first time. I was lucky because my first experience was with some top notch players. Some players aren't as lucky as me.

Most of you will say that keeping those players who will quit that early around is pointless, but BD will never grow and will stagnate if all the donating players get on one team and lay waste to alliances that thought them to be friendly. New players will never stick around if this kind of thing happens every era.


Lol....its like saying RAP3 should be punished for being too good. Why don't you guys accept the challenge then.

We have no allies....why don't you, Milamber, personally go and recruit the New players into your alliance, form allies or a coalition and come attack us. We have no allies or will not take external help. Why not you come and make the first move, instead of whining that you got conquered?

_________________
Image

S-KaY<3 says:
*i live on the BD forum xD
*i'm there 25/8


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 2:24 am 
Major
Major
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:22 am
Posts: 3857
Location: Spam Section
Gender: male
Milamber wrote:
the reason I call it bad sportsmanship is because of this.... how many players do you know of that actually stick around a game that allows them to be conquered in the first 10th of a round? I stick around because I have been playing BD for a good 2 years now and know how to rebuild, but a newb will quit because their entire alliance was crippled so early in the game.

The reason BD always loosed 2/3 of the players by tick 4000 is that most of the players are newbs that are trying the game out for the first time. I was lucky because my first experience was with some top notch players. Some players aren't as lucky as me.

Most of you will say that keeping those players who will quit that early around is pointless, but BD will never grow and will stagnate if all the donating players get on one team and lay waste to alliances that thought them to be friendly. New players will never stick around if this kind of thing happens every era.


Man, I've been saying that for a while, and apparently there is nothing you can do to change that. Don't bring those type of problems to the War/Diplomatic section when you should be suggesting a new way to improve your so called 'sportsmanship'.

_________________
Quote:
After months of not speaking
Numair: You still alive? This was my only way to actually see if your online
Zhester: *You're :D


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 12:22 pm 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:38 pm
Posts: 741
Location: Seminole, FL
Gender: male
Well, Angel practically handed this round to RAP3 on a golden platter by disbanding AoD. Maybe if we stay really quiet, RAP3 will let us live. :?

_________________
Back from hiatus!
M1 - TwF
Image
Image


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 10:45 pm 
Corporal
Corporal
 Profile

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:00 pm
Posts: 71
Gender: male
or maybe hand over your relic? :D

_________________
Highest alliance (Member):
#11 E4 UTM

Highest alliance (Leader):
E5 GS #1

Highest personal rank: #4
Highest power: 111
Career relics held: 4
Highest crystal count: 127

OC name: Incoherent


Top
 

 Post subject: Re: The era of the backstab
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 12:35 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar
 WWW  YIM  Profile

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:33 pm
Posts: 735
Location: fantasy
Gender: male
YOU guys can make as much allias as you want there
is nothing stoping RAP3

_________________
-AP- GS
FMJ oVo
GS BFPT
HAHA
Image
Image


Skype name edwin7744 :D


Top
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Copyright Tacticsoft Ltd. 2008   
Updated By phpBBservice.nl