Play Free War Battle Games Online, Multiplayer Games, Strategy Games, Top MMORPG

starwarsfan2988 · **Joined:** Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:52 pm **Posts:** 31

Ok, i think yes, because we dont what BD to turn into a reck then have to shut down!

-Star wars fan

mrtnmrtn · **Joined:** Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:38 pm **Posts:** 2

this should be enforced and dealt with immediatly. the point of the game is to win by taking all relics right? well if people just allow others to conquer them then that is fine but when that conquered person actually helps his conquerer it defeats the purpose of competition and is really just one giant team trying to win and a few power players manipulating the lower players into giving them "safety" while being under their rule. This is a perfect of example of what sub alliances do! why make a sub alliance in another alliance's shadow? in the end if your the sub with more power or the final relic to your main sub then your going to be betrayed by the alliance you worship! they WILL take your relic, they WILL win, and you WILL lose. if people continue this system it ruins the game for the true players who are trying to rise to the top by tactics and economy and instead they try to win by threats, flattery, "protection". please admin outlaw sub alliances. if your conquered why not just make it so that you cant help your conquerer like not being able to attack other colonies while being under someone else? it doesn't even make sense why a person would attack someone else while under rule of another player. you get a crystal but what's that going to do? it just makes you a target. please do something soon its bad enough to go to war with a huge alliance its worse to go to war with all their little indoctrinated too.

eibbor345 · **Joined:** Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:30 am **Posts:** 2

it is not a type of farming it is simply just backstabbing if they want to be know as people who backstab that is fine by me. the admin doesnt need to get that involved in the game where backstabbing isnt allowed that is just part of the game. and people of cool who are kicked are usally inactive like they have something real to do instead of play a game.

Gummbi · **Joined:** Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:25 pm **Posts:** 1

it's fine if he plays but not if he does not play in very often! ban in that case and ill be

darathmurrough · **Posted:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:56 pm

Hmm I remember an alliance on either E1 or E4 a while ago, cant remember the name but they fought GIFT lol anyway I bring it up because they experimented with a new version of sub and alliance which gave all crystals to one member of the alliance for easier defence and also had the sub conquered for resources while the sub was an offical alliance, I am not sure if this was before farming rules, I am wondering if this kind of experimentation is now banned as I have to admit it seemed like a decent stratigic move ;}~

littleconqueror · **Posted:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:00 pm

shouldnt be that is actually good strategy

lifenstuff · **Posted:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:03 pm

@cianog the part about giving the crystals to one member is not farming or rather it should be good strategy as LC stated. the other part is ehhh

koriko12 · **Joined:** Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:35 am **Posts:** 119

I've been in one of those b4, it's called a "dead sub." That is basically what this is referring to. So even though I don't like it in most cases, I think dead subs would b banned to, so I'll have to vote no :/

dhananjay · **Posted:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:31 pm

I Casted My vote :lol:

rino · **Posted:** Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:48 pm

If anything it is a point of view

Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?)