Author |
Message |
starwarsfan2988
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:38 pm |
|
Specialist |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:52 pm Posts: 31
|
Ok, i think yes, because we dont what BD to turn into a reck then have to shut down! -Star wars fan
|
|
Top |
|
mrtnmrtn
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:51 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:38 pm Posts: 2
|
this should be enforced and dealt with immediatly. the point of the game is to win by taking all relics right? well if people just allow others to conquer them then that is fine but when that conquered person actually helps his conquerer it defeats the purpose of competition and is really just one giant team trying to win and a few power players manipulating the lower players into giving them "safety" while being under their rule. This is a perfect of example of what sub alliances do! why make a sub alliance in another alliance's shadow? in the end if your the sub with more power or the final relic to your main sub then your going to be betrayed by the alliance you worship! they WILL take your relic, they WILL win, and you WILL lose. if people continue this system it ruins the game for the true players who are trying to rise to the top by tactics and economy and instead they try to win by threats, flattery, "protection". please admin outlaw sub alliances. if your conquered why not just make it so that you cant help your conquerer like not being able to attack other colonies while being under someone else? it doesn't even make sense why a person would attack someone else while under rule of another player. you get a crystal but what's that going to do? it just makes you a target. please do something soon its bad enough to go to war with a huge alliance its worse to go to war with all their little indoctrinated too.
Last edited by mrtnmrtn on Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
eibbor345
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:49 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:30 am Posts: 2
|
it is not a type of farming it is simply just backstabbing if they want to be know as people who backstab that is fine by me. the admin doesnt need to get that involved in the game where backstabbing isnt allowed that is just part of the game. and people of cool who are kicked are usally inactive like they have something real to do instead of play a game.
|
|
Top |
|
Gummbi
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:16 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:25 pm Posts: 1
|
it's fine if he plays but not if he does not play in very often! ban in that case and ill be
|
|
Top |
|
darathmurrough
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:56 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:32 am Posts: 625 Location: Eire for life haha Gender: male
|
Hmm I remember an alliance on either E1 or E4 a while ago, cant remember the name but they fought GIFT lol anyway I bring it up because they experimented with a new version of sub and alliance which gave all crystals to one member of the alliance for easier defence and also had the sub conquered for resources while the sub was an offical alliance, I am not sure if this was before farming rules, I am wondering if this kind of experimentation is now banned as I have to admit it seemed like a decent stratigic move ;}~
_________________
Thanks for the Sig Dawnice ;}~ Skype: cianoige
Wins on this account:F4 Era 16 (Led JFF and finished Rank 1)
Allies ATM:none ;{~
|
|
Top |
|
littleconqueror
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:10 pm Posts: 2761 Location: USA Gender: male
|
shouldnt be that is actually good strategy
_________________ MGH 1st MGH 1st WWs 1st XIRX 4th TTE 1st RFW 2nd Hero 2nd
3rd E5 SOLO FPM 1st TFF 2nd ToXc 1st add me on supermechs 8069321
|
|
Top |
|
lifenstuff
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:03 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:55 pm Posts: 1546 Gender: male
|
@cianog the part about giving the crystals to one member is not farming or rather it should be good strategy as LC stated. the other part is ehhh
_________________
Apollo wrote: Eh, I try to win every once and awhile. Gotta keep up appearances.
|
|
Top |
|
koriko12
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:23 pm |
|
Sergeant |
|
|
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:35 am Posts: 119
|
I've been in one of those b4, it's called a "dead sub." That is basically what this is referring to. So even though I don't like it in most cases, I think dead subs would b banned to, so I'll have to vote no :/
_________________ DMWU, FPM(Win)
|
|
Top |
|
dhananjay
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:31 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:28 pm Posts: 19 Gender: male
|
I Casted My vote
|
|
Top |
|
rino
|
Post subject: Re: Enforce / Do not enforce... (your thoughts?) Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:48 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:50 pm Posts: 10 Gender: male
|
If anything it is a point of view
_________________ I r badz
In-game name: Yixil Max Rank: 12 Max Power: 189 Most Crystals: 52 Relics Captured: 10
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|