Author 
Message 
Tom

Post subject: Re: Scanning margin of error Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:58 am 

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm Posts: 1902 Location: Lancaster, UK

I find the easiest way to get a reasonably exact figure is to do multiple scans. What you're looking for is actually the most inaccurate scans.
Example: Actual unit number: 50 4x scans say: 33, 68, 46, 71
You then work out the maximum/minimum it could be from the largest and smallest numbers.
Smallest number: 33 33 = 66  50% therefore you know that the 33 result means that the real number cannot be above 66.
Largest number: 71 71 = 47.3 + 50% therefore you know that the 71 result means that the real number cannot be below 47.3 (47)
Using this method you now know that your real number is between 47 and 66. Using advanced scans/more scans produces a more accurate outcome. Depends how much energy you can spare.
_________________ MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky  100740 score  M1A2) M1, M2, F1, G1 and G2 World Admin


Top 

maxattack

Post subject: Re: Scanning margin of error Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:05 pm 

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 8:09 pm Posts: 1994 Location: Look behind you. Theres a shadow. Look at where it is. It isnt me Gender: male

wow thats surprisingly helpful. Thanks!
_________________ Retired AANC Mentor  Retired MT Member  CMoTM  SoTM IGN(s) : Maxattack, MAXS
Retired player, trying to come back again.


Top 

kerov

Post subject: Re: Scanning margin of error Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 11:11 am 

Private 


Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:34 am Posts: 1

may i point out that the ~ symbol actually means roughly equivalent too suggesting that normal military scans have an accuracy of roughly 50% meaning the scan can be anywhere up to 54.5% accurate. However if the use of the symbol ~ in game is not actually anything other than meaning =50% accuracy then i feel that it should be replaced as it contravenes mathematics. Thanks and hopefully that one can be cleared up.


Top 

Tom

Post subject: Re: Scanning margin of error Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:29 pm 

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm Posts: 1902 Location: Lancaster, UK

Scans are given the ~ due to the fact that the can results vary by the figure given. Making a scan say =50% would be inaccurate as the scans are (almost never) exactly accurate. You appear to have misunderstood how scans in BD work, or I've misunderstood your post.
_________________ MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky  100740 score  M1A2) M1, M2, F1, G1 and G2 World Admin


Top 

GerberBaby1

Post subject: Re: Scanning margin of error Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:40 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:48 pm Posts: 1109

Tom wrote: I find the easiest way to get a reasonably exact figure is to do multiple scans. What you're looking for is actually the most inaccurate scans.
Example: Actual unit number: 50 4x scans say: 33, 68, 46, 71
You then work out the maximum/minimum it could be from the largest and smallest numbers.
Smallest number: 33 33 = 66  50% therefore you know that the 33 result means that the real number cannot be above 66.
Largest number: 71 71 = 47.3 + 50% therefore you know that the 71 result means that the real number cannot be below 47.3 (47)
Using this method you now know that your real number is between 47 and 66. Using advanced scans/more scans produces a more accurate outcome. Depends how much energy you can spare. Everything here is great! This is pretty thorough. Another thing that you could use is to check their statistics if it is early in the era. That will give you the maximum amount they can have in their colony. It is 100% accurate. I agree with everything except advanced scans are only 25% accurate the regular scans are 50% accurate. So it would make more sense just to run more regular scans then advanced ones especially since the advanced ones cost more energy. Tho the method you gave was a great one and I suggest everyone use it.
_________________


Top 

Tom

Post subject: Re: Scanning margin of error Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:44 am 

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm Posts: 1902 Location: Lancaster, UK

~50% means there is a potential variation of 50% (100 units could show between 50 and 150)
~25% means there's a potential variation of 25% (100 units could show between 75 and 125)
The ~25% result is more accurate, not less. Also both scans can produce either 50% or 25%.
_________________ MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky  100740 score  M1A2) M1, M2, F1, G1 and G2 World Admin


Top 


You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum

