Author |
Message |
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:55 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
The morale of this story, is that Plotter and MrDucky ACTUALLY AGREE ON SOMETHING.
OMGWTFPWND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
One of you ever saw the vid "Crazy Florida Voting Machine"?
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:26 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Jasper Alexander wrote: The morale of this story, is that Plotter and MrDucky ACTUALLY AGREE ON SOMETHING.
OMGWTFPWND!!!!!!
and to think you chided me before for spamming. tsk tsk tsk. Quote: Which is fine, because there would be at least 1000 terrorist attacks in America, but then again, Bush is a warlock, so both Hypocrite Gore and Warlock Bush are horrible picks. and that is one of the reasons why democracy is flawed. who said it was perfect? besides, 100 911 attacks still dont compare with civilian casualties encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan. if anyone here has seen team America... "its 911 times 100!" "OMG, it would be.... 91100!!!! OH GOD" Quote: Hypocracy alert. pfft, i advocate a use of both socialism and capitalism, you are like USA in 1960s THE DAMN COMMYS ARE AFTER US KILLLLL! KILLLL!!!!
_________________
-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
Alexander
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:44 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:41 am Posts: 4629 Location: The Netherlands Gender: male
|
The difference is that I blend it in with a serious post, and thus make people laugh and don't post something utterly useless ^.^
Mehh, I am for the republic government (like the Roman Empire).
Less BS-ing, more action...
_________________ Best Regards,
Alexander Product Manager Battle Dawn
Skype: dreamerofdestruction
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:24 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Jasper Alexander wrote: The difference is that I blend it in with a serious post, and thus make people laugh and don't post something utterly useless ^.^
Mehh, I am for the republic government (like the Roman Empire).
Less BS-ing, more action... they were also pretty non big brother like and absorbed culture rather then crushed it. good times... good times... advanced roads were built beautiful architecture a hundred or so gods dreamt up the sex parties were invented back then too good times... but a part of democracy is the BS-ing. its unavoidable. its like telling marketers to not exaggerate.
_________________
-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
Andrew
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:56 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:23 pm Posts: 925 Location: Ontario, Canada Gender: male
|
mrducky wrote: but a part of democracy is the BS-ing. its unavoidable. its like telling marketers to not exaggerate. Heh funny point there, that's a quotable line for sure .
I am one that believes in balance, we need some conservative/capitalist views and some liberal/socialist views. Socialism has brought great things to Canada such as our Health Care system but it has also brought national debt. If both the conservatives and liberal sides of our governments worked together and compromised equally I think Canada would benefit. By bridging the 2 ideals we can get the best of both worlds, increase social programs and assistance to those who need it while cutting down our national debt and making effective use of our resources and taxes.
-Andrew
_________________ Ex-
|
|
Top |
|
Plotter
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:47 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:04 am Posts: 542 Location: Canuckistan Gender: female
|
Andrew wrote: mrducky wrote: but a part of democracy is the BS-ing. its unavoidable. its like telling marketers to not exaggerate. Heh funny point there, that's a quotable line for sure .
I am one that believes in balance, we need some conservative/capitalist views and some liberal/socialist views. Socialism has brought great things to Canada such as our Health Care system but it has also brought national debt. If both the conservatives and liberal sides of our governments worked together and compromised equally I think Canada would benefit. By bridging the 2 ideals we can get the best of both worlds, increase social programs and assistance to those who need it while cutting down our national debt and making effective use of our resources and taxes.
-Andrew Huge Problem: Conservatives are the classic Liberal and the Lieberals are now a left wing party, and also, the Lieberals and the Non-Democratic Party don't wanna cooperate, at least Count Iggy wants to cooperate with the Neo-Conservatiefs, unlike his predecessor, Commie Dionsky.
_________________ Worlds I play(ed) in: E5A4 - COLD E5A8 - >GP<
E3A1 - MES
My ISP sucks
|
|
Top |
|
Hell Scream
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:51 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:42 pm Posts: 43 Gender: male
|
Socialism? In America? Really?
America is owned by private corporations and enterprises. I don't see what you are talking about. The private sector is more influential than your goverment.
America is a country ruled by the Private Sector. All politicians rely on funds from said Private Sector to get elected and in turn make decisions based on the Private Sector's interests, not the interests of the people.
Last time I checked, the 10 trillion dollar debt is what Bush did, not Clinton nor Obama. If memory serves me right, under Clinton there was no debt.
First, learn what's socialism. Then and only then talk about it.
_________________ Permanently Retired
|
|
Top |
|
riski1234567dr
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:57 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:58 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
HS, there was no debt under clinton because of Reagan :S
And After 3 months in office Obama has QUADROUPLED the USA's debts.
|
|
Top |
|
Plotter
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:04 am Posts: 542 Location: Canuckistan Gender: female
|
Hell Scream wrote: Socialism? In America? Really? Last time I checked, the 10 trillion dollar debt is what Bush did, not Clinton nor Obama. If memory serves me right, under Clinton there was no debt. Bush was only like 1¼ Trillion bucks in debt US, Obama went shopping once he got into power
PS Obama now implememnted the disastrous Cap and Trade (Known as the Green Shaft or Green S**t where I live.), which has the potential to separate a country.
_________________ Worlds I play(ed) in: E5A4 - COLD E5A8 - >GP<
E3A1 - MES
My ISP sucks
|
|
Top |
|
Daganev
|
Post subject: Re: Socialism is a failure Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:01 pm |
|
Second Lieutenant |
|
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:25 am Posts: 231
|
Its hard to say what America is/becoming these days.
GM is now owned and operated by two national governments. They are going to have to come up with a new term for government controlled industry outside of Fascism.
The whole crazy thing to me though, is that in America we are not talking about government health care, we are actually talking about government health insurance.
They are two very different things. Currently, anybody in the united states, will get health services if they show up to a hospital, and they will get health care. The question is who actually pays for it. Even when you are insured, you still have to pay a bit. It's crazy to me, because the conversation isn't even an accurate one.
It's like people have forgotten what the term "insurance" refers to.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|