malicewolf wrote:
Well, you did well in showing your writing skills, but you may have wanted to go to screenshots at some point
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
This get's very number heavy and it becomes a mess to look at.
Yeah, took me forever to write that the truth is I would rather have 400 Range then 400 damage if they wasn't anythingn else with it; and to be honest range does have a advantage in slightly more cases then damage but damage is still useful people should have some damage and now that range only does more damage two rounds instead of 3 it makes a difference. Nonetheless both are useful.
Sorry about that..
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)