Author |
Message |
riski1234567dr
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:44 am |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:58 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
I'm sitting around watching, and I'm not sure what SA is doing in all of this, but watch them. Because I know their players, and they are the best players I've ever played with/against.
|
|
Top |
|
316434
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm Posts: 68
|
apollo wrote: I'm sitting around watching, and I'm not sure what SA is doing in all of this, but watch them. Because I know their players, and they are the best players I've ever played with/against. Touche, i also, know a few and know their intentions, power and potential to win. Which is why id rather face them united with the other top alliance while some are still alive, then in post-war slaughter
_________________ - SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD, TJGA, SiN, CME
CME family
|
|
Top |
|
Supz108x
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:24 am |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:46 am Posts: 67
|
Well attacking an alliance you hold a NAP with till 1700 agreed in the first 500 ticks of the round will not be easy.
I understood that SA can not go to aus and BL and AcO can not be in AA. So if these agreements are kept how could we attack SA? surly they are immune untill the nap is up or unless they break it.?
|
|
Top |
|
DamoESP
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:02 am |
|
Sergeant |
|
|
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:36 am Posts: 115 Gender: male
|
I find it amusing that people talk about attacking allies, or those they have a NAP with etc, on an open forum. Way to keep the cards close to your chest About as smart as half the Broadcasts you read
_________________ -Alliances- OC: NOM, XXX, NACO, BYZ, nWo, aRaB NC: AcO, DC, WHO, CBoP, BYZ
|
|
Top |
|
Hypolaw
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:08 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:52 pm Posts: 20 Location: Thessaloniki, Greece Gender: male
|
Typical Kaiser, isn't it??
|
|
Top |
|
316434
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:17 am |
|
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm Posts: 68
|
lol is Hypolaw PSiT?
_________________ - SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD, TJGA, SiN, CME
CME family
|
|
Top |
|
316434
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:07 am |
|
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:41 pm Posts: 68
|
Orestis, as i recall, your alliance (PSiT) backstabbed us. We had a NAP and when my alliance (AcO) was making gates and radars and ops in NA you decided to do a clearly planned and organized attack. NA was 39th's homeland, not yours. And either way, you must have planeed before that , because you had your armies and spams perfectly postioned from California, all the way to Brazil for war. Our ops barley even had 30 contorl ticks and then out of no where you attack us.
We merely defended, so who is the backstabbed? and as i recall , GML is notorious for backstabing
_________________ - SiGmund/Kaiser/SiNister AVA, NoS, 39th, AcO, BL, H1N1, NERF, MAD, TJGA, SiN, CME
CME family
|
|
Top |
|
Supz108x
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:24 am |
|
Corporal |
|
|
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:46 am Posts: 67
|
I heard BL are going to help SA take down AcO for second place.... eh but whwat do i know... im just a sub
|
|
Top |
|
felgrand08
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:20 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:29 am Posts: 449 Gender: male
|
Supz108x wrote: I heard BL are going to help SA take down AcO for second place.... eh but whwat do i know... im just a sub BL....is going to help SA(who is attacking us) take down AcO(who is our closest and most trusted ally) so we can take 2nd place, witch we are going to get with AcO...What part of that made sense? Not trying to bash you, but the logic that is lacking from this has me boggled.
_________________ IGN-Seth of Diehard/MADGOD
Current alliances-none Former alliacnes-EA,LOZ,ZN,SF,VAL,MAD,BoS,KWP
|
|
Top |
|
riski1234567dr
|
Post subject: Re: ASPC/OC/MILF + UA vs AcO + PcO/BL + Awe Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:34 pm |
|
Private |
|
|
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:58 am Posts: 0 Gender: male
|
GML was never a backstabbing alliance. Where have you heard such? 316434 wrote: and as i recall , GML is notorious for backstabing
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|